Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The design and analysis of real-world cryptographic protocols

Samuel M. Scott

Published Jan 1, 2018• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

The Design and Analysis of Cryptographic Protocols.

Richard A. DeMillo, Nancy Ann Lynch, Michael Merritt

International Cryptology Conference•Jan 1, 1981•0 citations

A Framework for Universally Composable Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange

Ralf Küsters, Daniel Rausch

The analysis of real-world protocols, in particular key exchange protocols and protocols building on these protocols, is a very complex, error-prone, and tedious task. Besides the complexity of the protocols itself, one important reason for this is that the security of the protocols has to be reduced to the security of the underlying cryptographic primitives for every protocol time and again. We would therefore like to get rid of reduction proofs for real-world key exchange protocols as much as possible and in many cases altogether, also for higher-level protocols which use the exchanged keys. So far some first steps have been taken in this direction. But existing work is still quite limited, and, for example, does not support Diffie-Hellman (DH) key exchange, a prevalent cryptographic primitive for real-world protocols. In this paper, building on work by Kusters and Tuengerthal, we provide an ideal functionality in the universal composability setting which supports several common cryptographic primitives, including DH key exchange. This functionality helps to avoid reduction proofs in the analysis of real-world protocols and often eliminates them completely. We also propose a new general ideal key exchange functionality which allows higherlevel protocols to use exchanged keys in an ideal way. As a proof of concept, we apply our framework to three practical DH key exchange protocols, namely ISO 9798-3, SIGMA, and OPTLS.

IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P)•May 1, 2017•18 citations

Cautionary note for protocol designers: Security proof is not enough

Aurore Gillet, Marc Jóye, Jean-Jacques Quisquater

Security requirements for real-life applications still increase. For this purpose, many people develop cryptographic protocols in order to fulfill these needs. When someone designs a new protocol, he usually uses cryptographic tools for which he is confident. The design and the analysis of these tools is the domain

•Jan 1, 1997•1 citation

A Framework for the Study of Cryptographic Protocols

Richard J. Berger, Sampath Kannan, René Peralta

Springer eBooks•Feb 28, 2007•14 citations

Migrating to Hybrid Cryptography in Practice: The TutaCrypt Protocol and Its Security

Christian Holler, Tibor Jager, Tom Neuschulten

In this work, we study the hybrid key establishment protocol TutaCrypt as a concrete case of post-quantum cryptographic migration in practice. The protocol was developed by the end-to-end encrypted email provider Tuta and has been deployed to more than ten million users worldwide. We present the protocol in a form that enables rigorous cryptographic analysis and define two Bellare–Rogaway-style security models that precisely characterize the provided security guarantees. The two models capture that the security properties achieved in the pre-quantum setting are slightly stronger than in the post-quantum setting. We then give reduction-based security proofs that clarify under which assumptions the construction achieves security, and how its guarantees degrade if either the classical or the post-quantum component is compromised. Our results illustrate how formally grounded cryptographic models can capture real-world migration strategies and hybrid deployments. Such analyses help to understand the security properties of deployed cryptographic systems and help move cryptographic migration from best practice toward principled, verifiable design.

IACR Communications in Cryptology•Aug 3, 2026•0 citations

More realistic analyses of cryptographic protocols

裕俊 竹部

•Jan 1, 2013•0 citations
The analysis of real-world protocols, in particular key exchange protocols and protocols building on these protocols, is a very complex, error-prone, and tedious task. Besides the complexity of the protocols itself, one important reason for this is that the security of the protocols has to be reduced to the security of the underlying cryptographic primitives for every protocol time and again. We would therefore like to get rid of reduction proofs for real-world key exchange protocols as much as possible and in many cases altogether, also for higher-level protocols which use the exchanged keys. So far some first steps have been taken in this direction. But existing work is still quite limited, and, for example, does not support Diffie-Hellman (DH) key exchange, a prevalent cryptographic primitive for real-world protocols. In this paper, building on work by Kusters and Tuengerthal, we provide an ideal functionality in the universal composability setting which supports several common cryptographic primitives, including DH key exchange. This functionality helps to avoid reduction proofs in the analysis of real-world protocols and often eliminates them completely. We also propose a new general ideal key exchange functionality which allows higherlevel protocols to use exchanged keys in an ideal way. As a proof of concept, we apply our framework to three practical DH key exchange protocols, namely ISO 9798-3, SIGMA, and OPTLS.
In this work, we study the hybrid key establishment protocol TutaCrypt as a concrete case of post-quantum cryptographic migration in practice. The protocol was developed by the end-to-end encrypted email provider Tuta and has been deployed to more than ten million users worldwide. We present the protocol in a form that enables rigorous cryptographic analysis and define two Bellare–Rogaway-style security models that precisely characterize the provided security guarantees. The two models capture that the security properties achieved in the pre-quantum setting are slightly stronger than in the post-quantum setting. We then give reduction-based security proofs that clarify under which assumptions the construction achieves security, and how its guarantees degrade if either the classical or the post-quantum component is compromised. Our results illustrate how formally grounded cryptographic models can capture real-world migration strategies and hybrid deployments. Such analyses help to understand the security properties of deployed cryptographic systems and help move cryptographic migration from best practice toward principled, verifiable design.