Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Optimal quantum eigenstate filtering with application to solving quantum linear systems

Lin Lin, Yu Tong

Published Oct 31, 2019• 3 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Quantum Filtering for Linear Dynamical Quantum Systems

Hendra I. Nurdin, Naoki Yamamoto

Communications and control engineering/Communications and control engineering series•Jan 1, 2017•1 citation

Optimal polynomial based quantum eigenstate filtering with application to solving quantum linear systems

Lin, L, Tong, Y

We present a quantum eigenstate filtering algorithm based on quantum signal processing (QSP) and minimax polynomials. The algorithm allows us to efficiently prepare a target eigenstate of a given Hamiltonian, if we have access to an initial state with non-trivial overlap with the target eigenstate and have a reasonable lower bound for the spectral gap. We apply this algorithm to the quantum linear system problem (QLSP), and present two algorithms based on quantum adiabatic computing (AQC) and quantum Zeno effect respectively. Both algorithms prepare the final solution as a pure state, and achieves the near optimal Oe(dκlog(1/∊)) query complexity for a d-sparse matrix, where κ is the condition number, and ∊ is the desired precision. Neither algorithm uses phase estimation or amplitude amplification.

•Nov 11, 2020•75 citations

Quantum Filtering and Optimal Control

V. P. Belavkin, Simon Edwards

Quantum Stochastics and Information•Aug 1, 2008•40 citations

Optimal polynomial based quantum eigenstate filtering with application to solving quantum linear systems

Lin Lin, Yu Tong

We present a quantum eigenstate filtering algorithm based on quantum signal processing (QSP) and minimax polynomials. The algorithm allows us to efficiently prepare a target eigenstate of a given Hamiltonian, if we have access to an initial state with non-trivial overlap with the target eigenstate and have a reasonable lower bound for the spectral gap. We apply this algorithm to the quantum linear system problem (QLSP), and present two algorithms based on quantum adiabatic computing (AQC) and quantum Zeno effect respectively. Both algorithms prepare the final solution as a pure state, and achieves the near optimal O ~ ( d κ log ⁡ ( 1 / ϵ ) ) query complexity for a d -sparse matrix, where κ is the condition number, and ϵ is the desired precision. Neither algorithm uses phase estimation or amplitude amplification.

arXiv:1910.14596•Quantum•Nov 11, 2020•106 citations

Solving quantum linear system problem with near-optimal complexity.

Lin Lin, Yu Tong

We present a quantum eigenstate filtering algorithm based on quantum signal processing (QSP) and minimax polynomials. The algorithm allows us to efficiently prepare a target eigenstate of a given Hamiltonian, if we have access to an initial state with non-trivial overlap with the target eigenstate and have a reasonable lower bound for the spectral gap. We apply this algorithm to the quantum linear system problem (QLSP), and present two algorithms based on quantum adiabatic computing (AQC) and quantum Zeno effect respectively. Both algorithms prepare the final solution as a pure state, and achieves the near optimal $\mathcal{\widetilde{O}}(d\kappa\log(1/\epsilon))$ query complexity for a $d$-sparse matrix, where $\kappa$ is the condition number, and $\epsilon$ is the desired precision. Neither algorithm uses phase estimation or amplitude amplification.

•Oct 31, 2019•4 citations

Optimal state estimation for d-dimensional quantum systems

Dagmar Bruß, Chiara Macchiavello

arXiv:quant-ph/9812016•Physics Letters A•Mar 1, 1999•140 citations
We present a quantum eigenstate filtering algorithm based on quantum signal processing (QSP) and minimax polynomials. The algorithm allows us to efficiently prepare a target eigenstate of a given Hamiltonian, if we have access to an initial state with non-trivial overlap with the target eigenstate and have a reasonable lower bound for the spectral gap. We apply this algorithm to the quantum linear system problem (QLSP), and present two algorithms based on quantum adiabatic computing (AQC) and quantum Zeno effect respectively. Both algorithms prepare the final solution as a pure state, and achieves the near optimal Oe(dκlog(1/∊)) query complexity for a d-sparse matrix, where κ is the condition number, and ∊ is the desired precision. Neither algorithm uses phase estimation or amplitude amplification.
We present a quantum eigenstate filtering algorithm based on quantum signal processing (QSP) and minimax polynomials. The algorithm allows us to efficiently prepare a target eigenstate of a given Hamiltonian, if we have access to an initial state with non-trivial overlap with the target eigenstate and have a reasonable lower bound for the spectral gap. We apply this algorithm to the quantum linear system problem (QLSP), and present two algorithms based on quantum adiabatic computing (AQC) and quantum Zeno effect respectively. Both algorithms prepare the final solution as a pure state, and achieves the near optimal O ~ ( d κ log ⁡ ( 1 / ϵ ) ) query complexity for a d -sparse matrix, where κ is the condition number, and ϵ is the desired precision. Neither algorithm uses phase estimation or amplitude amplification.
We present a quantum eigenstate filtering algorithm based on quantum signal processing (QSP) and minimax polynomials. The algorithm allows us to efficiently prepare a target eigenstate of a given Hamiltonian, if we have access to an initial state with non-trivial overlap with the target eigenstate and have a reasonable lower bound for the spectral gap. We apply this algorithm to the quantum linear system problem (QLSP), and present two algorithms based on quantum adiabatic computing (AQC) and quantum Zeno effect respectively. Both algorithms prepare the final solution as a pure state, and achieves the near optimal O~(dκlog⁡(1/ϵ))\mathcal{\widetilde{O}}(d\kappa\log(1/\epsilon))O(dκlog(1/ϵ)) query complexity for a ddd-sparse matrix, where κ\kappaκ is the condition number, and ϵ\epsilonϵ is the desired precision. Neither algorithm uses phase estimation or amplitude amplification.