Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

APS

Conductance of Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid wires and junctions with resistances

Diptiman Sen, Abhiram Soori

Published Mar 1, 2011• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Quantized conductance in a mesoscopic Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid

Masao Ogata

Physica B Condensed Matter•Sep 1, 1996•0 citations

Junction of Tomonaga–Luttinger liquids

Masaki Oshikawa

Physica E Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures•Jul 29, 2005•0 citations

Tomonaga—Luttinger Liquid in Quantum Wires

Masao Ogata, Hidetoshi Fukuyama

Nanoscience and technology•Jan 1, 1998•0 citations

Conductance of Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid wires and junctions with resistances

Abhiram Soori, Diptiman Sen

We study the effect that resistive regions have on the conductance of a quantum wire with interacting electrons which is connected to Fermi liquid leads. Using the bosonization formalism and a Rayleigh dissipation function to model the power dissipation, we use both scattering theory and Green's function techniques to derive the DC conductance. The resistive regions are generally found to lead to incoherent transport. For a single wire, we find that the resistance adds in series to the contact resistance of h / e 2 for spinless electrons, and the total resistance is independent of the Luttinger parameter K W of the wire. We numerically solve the bosonic equations to illustrate what happens when a charge density pulse is incident on the wire; the results depend on the parameters of the resistive and interacting regions in interesting ways. For a junction of Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid wires, we use a dissipationless current splitting matrix to model the junction. For a junction of three wires connected to Fermi liquid leads, there are two families of such matrices; we find that the conductance matrix generally depends on K W for one family but is independent of K W for the other family, regardless of the resistances present in the system.

arXiv:1011.5058•Europhysics Letters (EPL)•Mar 1, 2011•13 citations

Conductance of Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid wires and junctions with resistances

Abhiram Soori, Diptiman Sen

We study the effect that resistive regions have on the conductance of a quantum wire with interacting electrons which is connected to Fermi liquid leads. Using the bosonization formalism and a Rayleigh dissipation function to model the power dissipation, we use both scattering theory and Green's function techniques to derive the DC conductance. The resistive regions are generally found to lead to incoherent transport. For a single wire, we find that the resistance adds in series to the contact resistance of h/e(2) for spinless electrons, and the total resistance is independent of the Luttinger parameter K-W of the wire. We numerically solve the bosonic equations to illustrate what happens when a charge density pulse is incident on the wire; the results depend on the parameters of the resistive and interacting regions in interesting ways. For a junction of Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid wires, we use a dissipationless current splitting matrix to model the junction. For a junction of three wires connected to Fermi liquid leads, there are two families of such matrices; we find that the conductance matrix generally depends on K-W for one family but is independent of K-W for the other family, regardless of the resistances present in the system. Copyright (c) EPLA, 2011

•Mar 1, 2011•7 citations

The Conductivity of the Tomonaga‐Luttinger Model

Victor Bârsan

physica status solidi (b)•Jun 1, 1989•0 citations
We study the effect that resistive regions have on the conductance of a quantum wire with interacting electrons which is connected to Fermi liquid leads. Using the bosonization formalism and a Rayleigh dissipation function to model the power dissipation, we use both scattering theory and Green's function techniques to derive the DC conductance. The resistive regions are generally found to lead to incoherent transport. For a single wire, we find that the resistance adds in series to the contact resistance of h / e 2 for spinless electrons, and the total resistance is independent of the Luttinger parameter K W of the wire. We numerically solve the bosonic equations to illustrate what happens when a charge density pulse is incident on the wire; the results depend on the parameters of the resistive and interacting regions in interesting ways. For a junction of Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid wires, we use a dissipationless current splitting matrix to model the junction. For a junction of three wires connected to Fermi liquid leads, there are two families of such matrices; we find that the conductance matrix generally depends on K W for one family but is independent of K W for the other family, regardless of the resistances present in the system.
We study the effect that resistive regions have on the conductance of a quantum wire with interacting electrons which is connected to Fermi liquid leads. Using the bosonization formalism and a Rayleigh dissipation function to model the power dissipation, we use both scattering theory and Green's function techniques to derive the DC conductance. The resistive regions are generally found to lead to incoherent transport. For a single wire, we find that the resistance adds in series to the contact resistance of h/e(2) for spinless electrons, and the total resistance is independent of the Luttinger parameter K-W of the wire. We numerically solve the bosonic equations to illustrate what happens when a charge density pulse is incident on the wire; the results depend on the parameters of the resistive and interacting regions in interesting ways. For a junction of Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid wires, we use a dissipationless current splitting matrix to model the junction. For a junction of three wires connected to Fermi liquid leads, there are two families of such matrices; we find that the conductance matrix generally depends on K-W for one family but is independent of K-W for the other family, regardless of the resistances present in the system. Copyright (c) EPLA, 2011