Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

APS

Multi-body flux-qubit couplers for quantum annealing

Gioele Consani, Paul A. Warburton, Nedeen Al Sharif

Published Jan 1, 2019• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Tunable ZZZ Coupler for Quantum Annealing with Superconducting Flux Qubits

Denis Melanson, Antonio Martinez, Hui-Chen Sun +3 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 5, 2018•1 citation

A many-body coupler for coherent 4-local interaction of superconducting flux qubits

Tim Menke, Cyrus F. Hirjibehedin, Steven J. Weber +5 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 4, 2019•1 citation

Coplanar waveguide flux qubit suitable for quantum annealing

Chris Quintana, Yu Chen, D. Sank +21 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 16, 2016•0 citations

Investigation of the Multiplier Composed of the Superconducting Flux Qubits for the Quantum Annealing

Daisuke Saida, Mutsuo Hidaka, Kentaro Imafuku +4 more

The Japan Society of Applied Physics•Jul 6, 2021•0 citations

Non-stoquastic XX couplers for superconducting flux qubits

David Ferguson, R. J. Epstein, Kenneth M. Zick

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 13, 2017•0 citations

Four-local interactions in a superconducting qubit architecture without ancilla qubits

Marius Schöndorf, Frank K. Wilhelm

The field of quantum information has matured and various protocols implementing a quantum computer are being pursued. Most similar to a classical computer is the circuit model. In 2007 Aharonov et al. showed the equivalence between the circuit model and a quantum annealer, and with this proofed the universality of quantum annealing. Here the system starts in an easily preparable ground state and evolves adiabatically to a final ground state which yields the solution of the computational problem. However, equivalence with the circuit model requires multi-local interactions, i.e. interaction terms involving more than two subsystems. Natural interactions are only two-local, hence the construction or simulation of higher order couplers is indispensable for a universal quantum annealer. Also, four-local couplers allow compact implementation of error correction with the Bacon-Shor code. Four-local interactions can further serve as a tool for basic research. Here we show that in a specific flux qubit coupler design without ancilla qubits, four body interactions are induced by virtual coupler excitations. For specific parameter regimes they are even the leading effect and can be tuned up to the GHz range.

•Nov 19, 2018•1 citation
The field of quantum information has matured and various protocols implementing a quantum computer are being pursued. Most similar to a classical computer is the circuit model. In 2007 Aharonov et al. showed the equivalence between the circuit model and a quantum annealer, and with this proofed the universality of quantum annealing. Here the system starts in an easily preparable ground state and evolves adiabatically to a final ground state which yields the solution of the computational problem. However, equivalence with the circuit model requires multi-local interactions, i.e. interaction terms involving more than two subsystems. Natural interactions are only two-local, hence the construction or simulation of higher order couplers is indispensable for a universal quantum annealer. Also, four-local couplers allow compact implementation of error correction with the Bacon-Shor code. Four-local interactions can further serve as a tool for basic research. Here we show that in a specific flux qubit coupler design without ancilla qubits, four body interactions are induced by virtual coupler excitations. For specific parameter regimes they are even the leading effect and can be tuned up to the GHz range.