Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A

Chaos and Possible Underpinnings for Quantum Mechanics

Wm. C. McHarris

Published Feb 1, 2001• 9 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract Deterministic chaos with its nonlinearities can formally reproduce some of the counterintuitive idiosyncrasies of quantum mechanics. In this paper I raise the question as to whether chaos might possibly supply some of the “hidden variables” that have been sought as underpinnings at a deeper level of quantum mechanics
DOI
10.1515/zna-2001-0137

Related papers

Quantum imponderables having parallels in nonlinear dynamics: indications of nonlinearities at the heart of quantum mechanics?

Wm. C. McHarris

Several of the imponderables associated with the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics have alternative, parallel explanations in terms of nonlinear dynamics and chaos. For example, an exponential law for processes such as radioactive decay can be obtained by iterating unimodal maps operating in chaotic domains, utilizing their extreme sensitivity to initial conditions. Such alternative explanations raise the question of the possibility of underlying nonlinearities in quantum mechanics. This is a ‘from the bottom up’, empirical approach to the question and will be compared with other, more theoretical, ‘from the top down’ investigations into the possibility of nonlinear extensions to quantum mechanics. Nonlinear dynamics, although deterministic, in its chaotic extreme provides only statistical information about the outcomes of state-space orbits. Thus in principle it provides the determinism so dear to Einstein; yet in practice it exhibits the probabilistic behaviour of Bohr. Perhaps Einstein and Bohr could both have been right.

Journal of Optics B Quantum and Semiclassical Optics•Jun 1, 2003•4 citations

Quantum Mechanics, Nonlinear Dynamics, and Correlated Statistical Mechanics

Wm. C. McHarris

Many of the so‐called paradoxes of orthodox quantum mechanics can be shown to have parallel, more logical interpretations in the realm of nonlinear dynamics and chaos theory. Among these are violations of Bell‐type inequalities, which in comparing “classical” mechanics with quantum mechanics implicitly compare uncorrelated and correlated statistics. During the past decade research in the field of nonextensive thermodynamics (including Tsallis entropy) has demonstrated the existence of many statistical correlations in classical, nonlinear systems. When such correlations exist, the conventional classical upper limit on statistical correlations in Bell‐type experiments can easily be raised to overlap with quantum mechanical predictions involving correlated states such as the Bell singlet state, a favorite for deriving Bell inequalities. Thus, arguments based on experimental violations of Bell‐type inequalities, which rule out the existence of “local reality,” become moot. Perhaps quantum mechanics does have a deterministic, ontological basis, albeit one based in nonlinear dynamics and chaos theory. If so, deterministic chaos could provide Einstein’s longed‐for fundamental determinism, but because chaotic systems must be interpreted statistically, this also fits in quite well with the ideas of Bohr — Einstein and Bohr both could have been correct! It should be emphasized that the concept of nonlinear dynamics and chaos underpinning quantum mechanics does not involve hidden variables, nor does the fact that chaos is deterministic interlope on the existence of free will.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2007•0 citations

Chaos: Possible Underpinnings for Quantum Mechanics?

Wm. C. McHarris

Acta Physica Hungarica A) Heavy Ion Physics•Apr 1, 2004•2 citations

Quantum mechanical suppression of chaos

R. Blümel, Uzy Smilansky

The relation between determinism and predictability is the central issue in the study of 'deterministic chaos'. Much knowledge has been accumulated in the past 10 years about the chaotic dynamics of macroscopic (classical) systems. Our intention is to examine the implications of chaos in the microscopic quantum world – in other words, how to reconcile the correspondence principle with the inherent uncertainties which reflect the wave nature of quantum dynamics. Some rather surprising and counterintuitive results emerge from this effort which bear an intriguing similarity to a phenomenon associated with electric conductivity in disordered solids, namely 'Anderson localisation'. It is very rewarding that these developments do not remain in the lofty realms of abstract theoretical physics. Indeed, recent atomic physics experiments demonstrate clearly that chaos is relevant to the microscopic world. In particular, such experiments emphasise the urgent need to clarify the genuine quantum mechanism which imposes severe limitations on quantum dynamics, and renders it so very different from its classical counterpart.

Physics World•Feb 1, 1990•4 citations

Nonlinearities in quantum mechanics

Wm. C. McHarris

Many of the paradoxes encountered in the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics can be shown to have plausible, more logical parallels in terms of nonlinear dynamics and chaos. These include the statistical exponential decay laws, interpretations of Bell's inequalities, spontaneous symmetry breaking, and perhaps diffractive behavior and even quantization itself. Many of the so-called alternative explanations of quantum mechanics have toyed with ideas that approach chaotic behavior, but as they were formulated before the advent of modern chaos theory, they remained within linear systems or at most nonlinear perturbations to linear systems; however, only strongly nonlinear systems can provide the proper parallels to the Copenhagen paradoxes. Several examples of these will be covered qualitatively. Strongly nonlinear behavior related to quantum mechanics does not involve "hidden variables," but chaos provides a bridge between the statistical behavior of quantum mechanics and deterministic behavior of classical mechanics. Perhaps both Einstein and Bohr were correct in their debates-chaos fundamentally provides the determinism so dear to Einstein, but in practice it must be interpreted statistically in the manner of Bohr.

Brazilian Journal of Physics•Jun 1, 2005•2 citations

Chaos and Quantum Mechanics

Salman Habib, Tanmoy Bhattacharya A, Benjamin D. Greenbaum +3 more

The relationship between chaos and quantum mechanics has been somewhat uneasy--even stormy, in the minds of some people. However, much of the confusion may stem from inappropriate comparisons using formal analyses. In contrast, our starting point here is that a complete dynamical description requires a full understanding of the evolution of measured systems, necessary to explain actual experimental results. This is of course true, both classically and quantum mechanically. Because the evolution of the physical state is now conditioned on measurement results, the dynamics of such systems is intrinsically nonlinear even at the level of distribution functions. Due to this feature, the physically more complete treatment reveals the existence of dynamical regimes--such as chaos--that have no direct counterpart in the linear (unobserved) case. Moreover, this treatment allows for understanding how an effective classical behavior can result from the dynamics of an observed quantum system, both at the level of trajectories as well as distribution functions. Finally, we have the striking prediction that time-series from measured quantum systems can be chaotic far from the classical regime, with Lyapunov exponents differing from their classical values. These predictions can be tested in next-generation experiments.

arXiv:quant-ph/0505085•Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences•Jun 1, 2005•24 citations
Several of the imponderables associated with the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics have alternative, parallel explanations in terms of nonlinear dynamics and chaos. For example, an exponential law for processes such as radioactive decay can be obtained by iterating unimodal maps operating in chaotic domains, utilizing their extreme sensitivity to initial conditions. Such alternative explanations raise the question of the possibility of underlying nonlinearities in quantum mechanics. This is a ‘from the bottom up’, empirical approach to the question and will be compared with other, more theoretical, ‘from the top down’ investigations into the possibility of nonlinear extensions to quantum mechanics. Nonlinear dynamics, although deterministic, in its chaotic extreme provides only statistical information about the outcomes of state-space orbits. Thus in principle it provides the determinism so dear to Einstein; yet in practice it exhibits the probabilistic behaviour of Bohr. Perhaps Einstein and Bohr could both have been right.
Many of the so‐called paradoxes of orthodox quantum mechanics can be shown to have parallel, more logical interpretations in the realm of nonlinear dynamics and chaos theory. Among these are violations of Bell‐type inequalities, which in comparing “classical” mechanics with quantum mechanics implicitly compare uncorrelated and correlated statistics. During the past decade research in the field of nonextensive thermodynamics (including Tsallis entropy) has demonstrated the existence of many statistical correlations in classical, nonlinear systems. When such correlations exist, the conventional classical upper limit on statistical correlations in Bell‐type experiments can easily be raised to overlap with quantum mechanical predictions involving correlated states such as the Bell singlet state, a favorite for deriving Bell inequalities. Thus, arguments based on experimental violations of Bell‐type inequalities, which rule out the existence of “local reality,” become moot. Perhaps quantum mechanics does have a deterministic, ontological basis, albeit one based in nonlinear dynamics and chaos theory. If so, deterministic chaos could provide Einstein’s longed‐for fundamental determinism, but because chaotic systems must be interpreted statistically, this also fits in quite well with the ideas of Bohr — Einstein and Bohr both could have been correct! It should be emphasized that the concept of nonlinear dynamics and chaos underpinning quantum mechanics does not involve hidden variables, nor does the fact that chaos is deterministic interlope on the existence of free will.
The relation between determinism and predictability is the central issue in the study of 'deterministic chaos'. Much knowledge has been accumulated in the past 10 years about the chaotic dynamics of macroscopic (classical) systems. Our intention is to examine the implications of chaos in the microscopic quantum world – in other words, how to reconcile the correspondence principle with the inherent uncertainties which reflect the wave nature of quantum dynamics. Some rather surprising and counterintuitive results emerge from this effort which bear an intriguing similarity to a phenomenon associated with electric conductivity in disordered solids, namely 'Anderson localisation'. It is very rewarding that these developments do not remain in the lofty realms of abstract theoretical physics. Indeed, recent atomic physics experiments demonstrate clearly that chaos is relevant to the microscopic world. In particular, such experiments emphasise the urgent need to clarify the genuine quantum mechanism which imposes severe limitations on quantum dynamics, and renders it so very different from its classical counterpart.
Many of the paradoxes encountered in the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics can be shown to have plausible, more logical parallels in terms of nonlinear dynamics and chaos. These include the statistical exponential decay laws, interpretations of Bell's inequalities, spontaneous symmetry breaking, and perhaps diffractive behavior and even quantization itself. Many of the so-called alternative explanations of quantum mechanics have toyed with ideas that approach chaotic behavior, but as they were formulated before the advent of modern chaos theory, they remained within linear systems or at most nonlinear perturbations to linear systems; however, only strongly nonlinear systems can provide the proper parallels to the Copenhagen paradoxes. Several examples of these will be covered qualitatively. Strongly nonlinear behavior related to quantum mechanics does not involve "hidden variables," but chaos provides a bridge between the statistical behavior of quantum mechanics and deterministic behavior of classical mechanics. Perhaps both Einstein and Bohr were correct in their debates-chaos fundamentally provides the determinism so dear to Einstein, but in practice it must be interpreted statistically in the manner of Bohr.
The relationship between chaos and quantum mechanics has been somewhat uneasy--even stormy, in the minds of some people. However, much of the confusion may stem from inappropriate comparisons using formal analyses. In contrast, our starting point here is that a complete dynamical description requires a full understanding of the evolution of measured systems, necessary to explain actual experimental results. This is of course true, both classically and quantum mechanically. Because the evolution of the physical state is now conditioned on measurement results, the dynamics of such systems is intrinsically nonlinear even at the level of distribution functions. Due to this feature, the physically more complete treatment reveals the existence of dynamical regimes--such as chaos--that have no direct counterpart in the linear (unobserved) case. Moreover, this treatment allows for understanding how an effective classical behavior can result from the dynamics of an observed quantum system, both at the level of trajectories as well as distribution functions. Finally, we have the striking prediction that time-series from measured quantum systems can be chaotic far from the classical regime, with Lyapunov exponents differing from their classical values. These predictions can be tested in next-generation experiments.