The present paper is devoted to modelling of a probability measure of logical connectives on a quantum logic via a G-map, which is a special map on it.We follow the work in which the probability of logical conjunction (AND), disjunction (OR), symmetric difference (XOR) and their negations for non-compatible propositions are studied.Now we study all remaining cases of G-maps on quantum logic, namely a probability measure of projections, of implications, and of their negations.We show that unlike classical (Boolean) logic, probability measures of projections on a quantum logic are not necessarilly pure projections.We indicate how it is possible to define a probability measure of implication using a G-map in the quantum logic, and then we study some properties of this measure which are different from a measure of implication in a Boolean algebra.Finally, we compare the properties of a G-map with the properties of a probability measure related to logical connectives on a Boolean algebra.
The present paper is devoted to modelling of a probability measure of logical connectives on a quantum logic via a G-map, which is a special map on it.We follow the work in which the probability of logical conjunction (AND), disjunction (OR), symmetric difference (XOR) and their negations for non-compatible propositions are studied.Now we study all remaining cases of G-maps on quantum logic, namely a probability measure of projections, of implications, and of their negations.We show that unlike classical (Boolean) logic, probability measures of projections on a quantum logic are not necessarilly pure projections.We indicate how it is possible to define a probability measure of implication using a G-map in the quantum logic, and then we study some properties of this measure which are different from a measure of implication in a Boolean algebra.Finally, we compare the properties of a G-map with the properties of a probability measure related to logical connectives on a Boolean algebra.
This paper deals with the topics of modeling joint distributions on a generalized probability space. An algebraic structure known as quantum logic is taken as the basic model. There is a brief summary of some earlier published findings concerning a function s-map, which is a mathematical tool suitable for constructing virtual joint probabilities of even non-compatible propositions. The paper completes conclusions published in 2020 and extends the results for three or more random variables if the marginal distributions are known. The existence of a (n+1)-variate joint distribution is shown in special cases when the quantum logic consists of at most n blocks of Boolean algebras.
When a physicist performs a quantic measurement, new information about the system at hand is gathered. This article studies the logical properties of how this new information is combined with previous information. It presents Quantum Logic as a propositional logic under two connectives: negation and the and then operation that combines old and new information. The and then connective is neither commutative nor associative. Many properties of this logic are exhibited, and some small elegant subset is shown to imply all the properties considered. No independence or completeness result is claimed. Classical physical systems are exactly characterized by the commutativity, the associativity, or the monotonicity of the and then connective. Entailment is defined in this logic and can be proved to be a partial order. In orthomodular lattices, the operation proposed by Finch in [3] satisfies all the properties studied in this article. All properties satisfied by Finch's; operation in modular lattices are valid in Quantum Logic. It is not known whether all properties of Quantum Logic are satisfied by Finch's; operation in modular lattices. Non-commutative, non-associative algebraic structures generalizing Boolean algebras are defined, ideals are characterized and a homomorphism theorem is proved.
Intuitionistic logic, in which the double negation law not-not-P = P fails, is dominant in categorical logic, notably in topos theory. This paper follows a different direction in which double negation does hold. The algebraic notions of effect algebra/module that emerged in theoretical physics form the cornerstone. It is shown that under mild conditions on a category, its maps of the form X -> 1+1 carry such effect module structure, and can be used as predicates. Predicates are identified in many different situations, and capture for instance ordinary subsets, fuzzy predicates in a probabilistic setting, idempotents in a ring, and effects (positive elements below the unit) in a C*-algebra or Hilbert space. In quantum foundations the duality between states and effects plays an important role. It appears here in the form of an adjunction, where we use maps 1 -> X as states. For such a state s and a predicate p, the validity probability s |= p is defined, as an abstract Born rule. It captures many forms of (Boolean or probabilistic) validity known from the literature. Measurement from quantum mechanics is formalised categorically in terms of `instruments', using L\"uders rule in the quantum case. These instruments are special maps associated with predicates (more generally, with tests), which perform the act of measurement and may have a side-effect that disturbs the system under observation. This abstract description of side-effects is one of the main achievements of the current approach. It is shown that in the special case of C*-algebras, side-effect appear exclusively in the non-commutative case. Also, these instruments are used for test operators in a dynamic logic that can be used for reasoning about quantum programs/protocols. The paper describes four successive assumptions, towards a categorical axiomatisation of quantitative logic for probabilistic and quantum systems.
Intuitionistic logic, in which the double negation law not-not-P = P fails, is dominant in categorical logic, notably in topos theory. This paper follows a different direction in which double negation does hold. The algebraic notions of effect algebra/module that emerged in theoretical physics form the cornerstone. It is shown that under mild conditions on a category, its maps of the form X -> 1+1 carry such effect module structure, and can be used as predicates. Predicates are identified in many different situations, and capture for instance ordinary subsets, fuzzy predicates in a probabilistic setting, idempotents in a ring, and effects (positive elements below the unit) in a C*-algebra or Hilbert space. In quantum foundations the duality between states and effects plays an important role. It appears here in the form of an adjunction, where we use maps 1 -> X as states. For such a state s and a predicate p, the validity probability s |= p is defined, as an abstract Born rule. It captures many forms of (Boolean or probabilistic) validity known from the literature. Measurement from quantum mechanics is formalised categorically in terms of `instruments', using L\"uders rule in the quantum case. These instruments are special maps associated with predicates (more generally, with tests), which perform the act of measurement and may have a side-effect that disturbs the system under observation. This abstract description of side-effects is one of the main achievements of the current approach. It is shown that in the special case of C*-algebras, side-effect appear exclusively in the non-commutative case. Also, these instruments are used for test operators in a dynamic logic that can be used for reasoning about quantum programs/protocols. The paper describes four successive assumptions, towards a categorical axiomatisation of quantitative logic for probabilistic and quantum systems.
Several attempts have been made to establish the logical structure of quantum mechanics on an axiomatic foundation. It has been shown that, whereas the logical structure of the propositional calculus of classical mechanics is that of a Boolean lattice, the logical structure of the propositional calculus of quantum mechanics is non-Boolean. Moreover, a probability model of a quantum system, namely, the quantum probability model, has a mathematical structure completely different from that of the Kolmogorovian probability model, which is the standard probability model of a classical system. These results, which are still controversial, are analysed and put in critical perspective.
This paper i a continuation of the first part under the same title. The author studies a joint distribution in σ-finite measures for noncompatible observables of a quantum logic defined on some system of σ-independent Boolean sub-σ-algebras of a Boolean σ-algebra. We present some necessary and sufficient conditions fot the existence of a joint distribution. In particular, it is shown that an arbitrary system of obsevables has a joint distribution in a measure iff it may be embedded into a system of compatible observables of some quantum logic. The methods used are different from those developed for finite measures. Finally, the author deals with the connection between the existence of a joint distribution and the existence of a commutator of observables, and the quantum logic of a nonseparable Hilbert space is mentioned.