Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology Organization and Management Series

Commercial quantum computing implementations failure

Ireneusz J. Jóźwiak, Piotr Paweł Jóźwiak

Published Jan 1, 2018• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.29119/1641-3466.2018.130.23

Related papers

The emerging commercial landscape of quantum computing

E. R. MacQuarrie, Christoph Simon, Stephanie Simmons +1 more

arXiv:2202.12733•Nature Reviews Physics•Oct 12, 2020•98 citations

Beyond the Qubit: Constructive Paradigms for Post-Particle Computation

Rowan Brad Quni-Gudzinas

Companion paper to "The Qubit Delusion" (v1.1, 10.5281/zenodo.21254143). If the qubit-gate-circuit model is an epistemic failure — a projection of particle ontology onto relational, field-theoretic reality — what comes next? We strip quantum mechanics to its minimal ontological commitments, survey alternative paradigms (MBQC, CV-QC, TQC, field-theoretic, analog) for ontological fidelity, assess commercial manufacturability of each physical platform, and ask whether "quantum computing" is even the right frame. The deeper lesson — that computation IS a physical process and the substrate IS the algorithm — points toward thermodynamic, neuromorphic, and optical architectures where physics does the computing directly.

•Jul 8, 2026•0 citations

Timing and Phase-Alignment Constraints at the Classical–Quantum Interface

Mizic, Paul

This technical report examines timing, phase-alignment, and jitter constraints that arise when classical control systems interface with coherence-sensitive quantum or quantum-adjacent subsystems. The scope is intentionally limited to abstract models and known physical constraints, with emphasis on identifying regimes of compatibility and failure. No specific architecture, implementation, or commercial system is proposed. This document is provided solely for technical scrutiny and discussion.

•Dec 17, 2025•0 citations

Quantum Computing Challenges

Jozef Gruska

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2001•22 citations

Fault-tolerant Quantum Computing

Yasunari Suzuki

The Journal of The Institute of Image Information and Television Engineers•Jan 1, 2022•0 citations

Error propagation in loss- and failure-tolerant quantum computation schemes

Peter P. Rohde, Timothy C. Ralph, William J. Munro

Qubit loss and gate failure are significant obstacles for the implementation of scalable quantum computation. Recently there have been several proposals for overcoming these problems, including schemes based on parity and cluster states. While effective at dealing with loss and gate failure, these schemes typically lead to a blow-out in effective depolarizing noise rates. In this supplementary paper we present a detailed analysis of this problem and techniques for minimizing it.

arXiv:quant-ph/0701090•Jan 14, 2007•0 citations
Companion paper to "The Qubit Delusion" (v1.1, 10.5281/zenodo.21254143). If the qubit-gate-circuit model is an epistemic failure — a projection of particle ontology onto relational, field-theoretic reality — what comes next? We strip quantum mechanics to its minimal ontological commitments, survey alternative paradigms (MBQC, CV-QC, TQC, field-theoretic, analog) for ontological fidelity, assess commercial manufacturability of each physical platform, and ask whether "quantum computing" is even the right frame. The deeper lesson — that computation IS a physical process and the substrate IS the algorithm — points toward thermodynamic, neuromorphic, and optical architectures where physics does the computing directly.