Quantum compilation is the task of translating a quantum algorithm implemented in a high-level quantum programming language into a technology-dependent instructions flow for a physical quantum computer. To tackle the large gap between the quantum program and the low-level instructions, quantum compilation is split into a multi-stage flow consisting of several layers of abstraction. Several different individual tasks have been proposed for the layers in the flow, many of them are NP-hard. In this article, we will describe the flow and we will propose algorithms based on Boolean satisfiability, which is a good match to tackle such computationally complex problems. This article is part of the theme issue 'Harmonizing energy-autonomous computing and intelligence'.
Quantum compilation is the task of translating a quantum algorithm implemented in a high-level quantum programming language into a technology-dependent instructions flow for a physical quantum computer. To tackle the large gap between the quantum program and the low-level instructions, quantum compilation is split into a multi-stage flow consisting of several layers of abstraction. Several different individual tasks have been proposed for the layers in the flow, many of them are NP-hard. In this article, we will describe the flow and we will propose algorithms based on Boolean satisfiability, which is a good match to tackle such computationally complex problems. This article is part of the theme issue 'Harmonizing energy-autonomous computing and intelligence'.
Abstract Quantum computers promise to transform our notions of computation by offering a completely new paradigm. To achieve scalable quantum computation, optimizing compilers and a corresponding software design flow will be essential. We present a software architecture for compiling quantum programs from a high-level language program to hardware-specific instructions. We describe the necessary layers of abstraction and their differences and similarities to classical layers of a computer-aided design flow. For each layer of the stack, we discuss the underlying methods for compilation and optimization. Our software methodology facilitates more rapid innovation among quantum algorithm designers, quantum hardware engineers, and experimentalists. It enables scalable compilation of complex quantum algorithms and can be targeted to any specific quantum hardware implementation.
We propose a flow for automated quantum compilation. Our flow takes a Boolean function implemented in Python as input and translates it into a format appropriate for reversible logic synthesis. We focus on two quantum compilation tasks: uniform state preparation and oracle synthesis. To illustrate the use of our flow, we solve IBM's virtual hackathon challenge of 2019, called the Zed city problem, an instance of vertex coloring, by using quantum search algorithms. The expressiveness of Python in combination with automated compilation algorithms allows us to express quantum algorithms at a high level of abstraction, which reduces the effort to implement them, and leads to better and more flexible implementations. We show that our proposed flow generates a lower-cost circuit implementation of the oracle needed to solve IBM's challenge when compared to the winning submission.
Practical realizations of quantum computers are poised to deliver outstanding computational capabilities far beyond the reach of any classical supercomputer. While classical systems are reliably implemented using CMOS technology, the fabrication of quantum hardware has not yet reached a commercially viable level of maturity. Nowadays, many different technologies are being developed as competing candidates to build the first error-corrected quantum computer. Among the software resources required to operate such a system, quantum compilers translate a high-level description of a quantum algorithm into low-level, technology-dependent quantum instructions. Many quantum algorithms, including Shor's and Grover's algorithms, require to compute some classical logic functions on the quantum computer. The first part of this thesis deals with the problem of compiling quantum circuits that perform such classical Boolean functions, called oracles, into a fault-tolerant set of instructions. Oracle circuits often demand many resources in terms of the number of qubits and gates. The focus is on compiling quantum circuits starting from multi-level logic networks representing large Boolean functions while minimizing the resource footprint of the obtained quantum circuits. At the same time, the trade-off between memory resources and the number of operations typical of such a compilation process is explored. As part of the effort in reducing the resources required to perform a given quantum program, I also present some quantum circuit optimization techniques. The researched algorithms leverage data structures and techniques borrowed and adapted from classical logic synthesis, e.g., SAT solvers, LUT mapping, and multi-level logic networks. I implemented all the compilation algorithms presented in this thesis as part of open-source projects. In particular, I develop and maintain caterpillar---a C++ header-only library dedicated to the quantum compilation of oracles and quantum memory management. The second part of this thesis describes how to equip quantum programming language compilers with automatic accuracy management. Despite the availability of many of such languages, resource estimation of quantum algorithms does not yet support taking approximation errors into account. This general methodology is applicable to any programming language and I demonstrate its integration into the Q# compiler. The technique consists of providing language support to ease the accuracy-aware programming task. The user can define accuracy parameters that will be automatically optimized according to a constraint and a cost function directly generated from the source code. In the presented practical evaluations, the constraint function is the overall allowed accuracy, while the cost function is application-dependent and related to the number of gates. During the optimization process, such functions are evaluated hundreds of times. For this reason, we extract them as (near-)symbolic expressions, whose evaluation time does not depend on the quantum algorithm size. The algorithms and the methodologies presented in this thesis are part of a widespread effort of the research community to build a complete and efficient software stack to program and control the first practical universal quantum computer.
Recent developments in quantum hardware indicate that systems featuring more than 50 physical qubits are within reach. At this scale, classical simulation will no longer be feasible and there is a possibility that such quantum devices may outperform even classical supercomputers at certain tasks. With the rapid growth of qubit numbers and coherence times comes the increasingly difficult challenge of quantum program compilation. This entails the translation of a high-level description of a quantum algorithm to hardware-specific low-level operations which can be carried out by the quantum device. Some parts of the calculation may still be performed manually due to the lack of efficient methods. This, in turn, may lead to a design gap, which will prevent the programming of a quantum computer. In this paper, we discuss the challenges in fully-automatic quantum compilation. We motivate directions for future research to tackle these challenges. Yet, with the algorithms and approaches that exist today, we demonstrate how to automatically perform the quantum programming flow from algorithm to a physical quantum computer for a simple algorithmic benchmark, namely the hidden shift problem. We present and use two tool flows which invoke RevKit. One which is based on ProjectQ and which targets the IBM Quantum Experience or a local simulator, and one which is based on Microsoft's quantum programming language Q#.
Quantum compiling fills the gap between the computing layer of high-level
quantum algorithms and the layer of physical qubits with their specific
properties and constraints. Quantum compiling is a hybrid between the
general-purpose compilers of computers, transforming high-level language to
assembly language and hardware synthesis by hardware description language,
where functions are automatically synthesized into customized hardware. Here we
review the quantum compiling stack of both gate model quantum computers and the
adiabatic quantum computers, respectively. The former involves low level qubit
control, quantum error correction, synthesis of short quantum circuits,
transpiling, while the latter involves the virtualization of qubits by
embedding of QUBO and HUBO problems on constrained graphs of physical qubits
and both quantum error suppression and correction. Commercial initiatives and
quantum compiling products are reviewed, including explicit programming
examples.
Quantum compiling fills the gap between the computing layer of high-level quantum algorithms and the layer of physical qubits with their specific properties and constraints. Quantum compiling is a hybrid between the general-purpose compilers of computers, transforming high-level language to assembly language and hardware synthesis by hardware description language, where functions are automatically synthesized into customized hardware. Here we review the quantum compiling stack of both gate model quantum computers and the adiabatic quantum computers, respectively. The former involves low level qubit control, quantum error correction, synthesis of short quantum circuits, transpiling, while the latter involves the virtualization of qubits by embedding of QUBO and HUBO problems on constrained graphs of physical qubits and both quantum error suppression and correction. Commercial initiatives and quantum compiling products are reviewed, including explicit programming examples.