Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Evolution of Fermion Pairing from Three to Two Dimensions

Martin W. Zwierlein

Published Jun 6, 2012• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Exact calculations of strongly paired fermions in two dimensions

Simone Chiesa, Shiwei Zhang

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 5, 2014•0 citations

One-dimensional fermion pairing

Rafael Mendoza, MANUEL DE LLANO, Mauricio Fortes +1 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 11, 2008•0 citations

Evolution of Fermion Pairing from Three to Two Dimensions

Ariel Sommer, Lawrence W. Cheuk, Mark Ku +2 more

We follow the evolution of fermion pairing in the dimensional crossover from three-dimensional to two-dimensional as a strongly interacting Fermi gas of ^{6}Li atoms becomes confined to a stack of two-dimensional layers formed by a one-dimensional optical lattice. Decreasing the dimensionality leads to the opening of a gap in radio-frequency spectra, even on the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer side of a Feshbach resonance. The measured binding energy of fermion pairs closely follows the theoretical two-body binding energy and, in the two-dimensional limit, the zero-temperature mean-field Bose-Einstein-condensation to Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer crossover theory.

arXiv:1110.3058•Physical Review Letters•Jan 23, 2012•190 citations

Simulation of fermionic lattice models in two dimensions with projected entangled-pair states: Next-nearest neighbor Hamiltonians

Philippe Corboz, Jacob Jordan, Guifré Vidal

In a recent contribution [P. Corboz, R. Or\'us, B. Bauer, and G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. B 81, 165104 (2010)] fermionic projected entangled-pair states (PEPSs) were used to approximate the ground state of free and interacting spinless fermion models, as well as the $t\text{\ensuremath{-}}J$ model. This paper revisits these three models in the presence of an additional next-nearest hopping amplitude in the Hamiltonian. First we explain how to account for next-nearest neighbor Hamiltonian terms in the context of fermionic PEPS algorithms based on simulating time evolution. Then we present benchmark calculations for the three models of fermions and compare our results against analytical, mean-field, and variational Monte Carlo results, respectively. Consistent with previous computations restricted to nearest neighbor Hamiltonians, we systematically obtain more accurate (or better converged) results for gapped phases than for gapless ones.

arXiv:1008.3937•Physical Review B•Dec 21, 2010•94 citations

Interacting Fermions in 2 Dimensions

Vincent Rivasseau

Lecture notes in physics•Jan 1, 2006•0 citations

Pairing in Fermion Systems

S. Mazumdar

Physical Review Letters•Nov 30, 1987•2 citations
We follow the evolution of fermion pairing in the dimensional crossover from three-dimensional to two-dimensional as a strongly interacting Fermi gas of ^{6}Li atoms becomes confined to a stack of two-dimensional layers formed by a one-dimensional optical lattice. Decreasing the dimensionality leads to the opening of a gap in radio-frequency spectra, even on the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer side of a Feshbach resonance. The measured binding energy of fermion pairs closely follows the theoretical two-body binding energy and, in the two-dimensional limit, the zero-temperature mean-field Bose-Einstein-condensation to Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer crossover theory.
In a recent contribution [P. Corboz, R. Or\'us, B. Bauer, and G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. B 81, 165104 (2010)] fermionic projected entangled-pair states (PEPSs) were used to approximate the ground state of free and interacting spinless fermion models, as well as the $t\text{\ensuremath{-}}J$ model. This paper revisits these three models in the presence of an additional next-nearest hopping amplitude in the Hamiltonian. First we explain how to account for next-nearest neighbor Hamiltonian terms in the context of fermionic PEPS algorithms based on simulating time evolution. Then we present benchmark calculations for the three models of fermions and compare our results against analytical, mean-field, and variational Monte Carlo results, respectively. Consistent with previous computations restricted to nearest neighbor Hamiltonians, we systematically obtain more accurate (or better converged) results for gapped phases than for gapless ones.