Artificial neural networks (ANNs) and quantum computing (QC) have both received rapidly increasing interest in recent years for several reasons. Their roles in the mechanics community remain a subject of ongoing debate and research. ANNs have successfully been employed on problems previously considered unsolvable ( Silver et al. 2016 ), as well as on practical and illustrative problems especially in the image recognition domain ( Szegedy et al. 2013 , among others). The most straightforward way to interpret the behavior of ANNs is focusing on their ability to approximate any continuous function to arbitrary precision ( Kreinovich 1991 ). The adjustment to a given function happens automatically except for hyperparameters, such as the number of hidden layers or the learning rate, which remain constant during training. This makes them a perfect tool for reducing computational cost in otherwise time-consuming simulations. Quantum computing on the other hand has received some publicity in 2018 mainly because of a paper published by Google Quantum A.I. Lab scientists defining quantum supremacy ( Boixo & Isakov 2018 ), where it is shown that a fully working universal quantum computer with only 50 qubits will outperform any near-term realizable classical supercomputer on certain tasks. This publication was followed up by Google revealing Bristlecone ( Kelly 2018 ), a quantum processor consisting of 72 qubits. While many interesting quantum algorithms have proven to run polynomially or even exponentially faster than their classical analogons ( Montanaro 2016 ), these results only hold true for a decoherence-free machine. Therefore, to actually achieve quantum supremacy , quantum error correction schemes need to be implemented, requiring several physical qubits to make up a single logical qubit suitable for computation.
Artificial neural networks (ANNs) and quantum computing (QC) have both received rapidly increasing interest in recent years for several reasons. Their roles in the mechanics community remain a subject of ongoing debate and research. ANNs have successfully been employed on problems previously considered unsolvable ( Silver et al. 2016 ), as well as on practical and illustrative problems especially in the image recognition domain ( Szegedy et al. 2013 , among others). The most straightforward way to interpret the behavior of ANNs is focusing on their ability to approximate any continuous function to arbitrary precision ( Kreinovich 1991 ). The adjustment to a given function happens automatically except for hyperparameters, such as the number of hidden layers or the learning rate, which remain constant during training. This makes them a perfect tool for reducing computational cost in otherwise time-consuming simulations. Quantum computing on the other hand has received some publicity in 2018 mainly because of a paper published by Google Quantum A.I. Lab scientists defining quantum supremacy ( Boixo & Isakov 2018 ), where it is shown that a fully working universal quantum computer with only 50 qubits will outperform any near-term realizable classical supercomputer on certain tasks. This publication was followed up by Google revealing Bristlecone ( Kelly 2018 ), a quantum processor consisting of 72 qubits. While many interesting quantum algorithms have proven to run polynomially or even exponentially faster than their classical analogons ( Montanaro 2016 ), these results only hold true for a decoherence-free machine. Therefore, to actually achieve quantum supremacy , quantum error correction schemes need to be implemented, requiring several physical qubits to make up a single logical qubit suitable for computation.
Artificial neural networks (ANN) proved to be efficient in solving many problems for big data analytics using machine learning. The complex and non-linear features of the input data can be learned and generalized by ANN. In the big data era, enormous amounts of data arrive from multiple sources. A stage is expected to be reached where even supercomputers are likely inundated with the big data. Training an ANN in such a situation is a challenging task due to the size and dimension of the big data. Also, a large number of parameters are to be used and optimized in the network to learn the patterns and analyze such data. Quantum computing is emerging as a field that provides a solution to this problem as a quantum computer can represent data differently using qubits. Qubits on quantum computers can be used to detect the hidden patterns in data that are difficult for a classical computer to find. Hence, there exists a huge scope for application in the area of artificial neural networks. In this work, we primarily focused on training an artificial neural network using qubits as artificial neurons. The simulation results show that our quantum computing approach for ANN (QC ANN) is efficient when compared to classical ANN. The model with qubits as artificial neurons can learn the features of data using fewer parameters for a binary classification task. We demonstrate our experiment using a quantum simulator and optimization of the quantum parameters used in QC ANN is carried out on a classical computer.
Artificial neural networks (ANNs) have gained significant attention in various fields due to their ability to learn from data and extract meaningful patterns. Quantum machine learning (QML) has opened new opportunities for ANNs, with the advent of quantum computing. This chapter provides an introduction to the use of ANNs in QML, discussing fundamentals of QML and quantum mechanics, adaptability of ANN components, quantum-inspired classical ANNs, quantum perceptrons, activation functions, quantum hidden layers, backpropagation, quantum convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and quantum feed-forward neural networks (FNNs). The chapter also discusses the potential impact of quantum ANNs on industries and research disciplines, including quantum chemistry, quantum error correction, and quantum machine learning for quantum computers. The chapter also discusses limitations of quantum ANNs, such as noise and the need for large-scale quantum processors, and future directions for quantum ANNs, such as hybrid models and quantum neural networks with machine learning acceleration.
Artificial neural networks, usually just called neural networks, computing systems indefinitely inspired by the biological neural networks and they are extensive in both research as well as industry. It is critical to design quantum Neural Networks for complete quantum learning tasks. In this project, we suggest a computational neural network model based on principles of quantum mechanics which form a quantum feed-forward neural network proficient in universal quantum computation. This structure takes input from one layer of qubits and drives that input onto another layer of qubits. This layer of qubits evaluates this information and drives on the output to the next layer. Eventually, the path leads to the final layer of qubits. The layers do not have to be of the same breadth, meaning they need not have the same number of qubits as the layer before and/or after it. This assembly is trained on which path to take identical to classical ANN. The intended project can be compiled by the subsequent points provided here: 1. The expert training of the quantum neural network utilizing the fidelity as a cost function, providing both conventional and efficient quantum implementations. 2. Use of methods that enable quick optimization with reduced memory requirements. 3. Benchmarking our proposal for the quantum task of learning an unknown unitary and find extraordinary generality and a remarkable sturdiness to noisy training data.
One of the most promising new directions in quantum computing and artificial intelligence convergence is the Quantum Neural Networks (QNNs) that can potentially revolutionize the manner in which intelligent systems are designed, trained, and implemented. Although traditional deep learning models have proven to be incredibly successful in fields like computer vision, natural language processing and autonomous systems, they are becoming limited by computational bottlenecks, energy use, and scalability constraints when operating on large high-dimensional data. The distinctive principles of quantum mechanics (superposition, entanglement, and quantum parallelism) may be applied to the QNNs to provide a distinct computational paradigm with the ability to execute exponentially complicated computations more effectively than his classical counterparts. This article gives an in-depth analysis of QNNs as the new frontier of artificial intelligence. We start with the description of the theoretical foundations of quantum computation and their realization in the form of neural networks. We then examine state-of-the-art QNN architectures, such as hybrid quantum-classical models that help overcome present quantum hardware limitations in relation to the capabilities of classical machine learning. Some of the upcoming applications are showcased including molecular simulation and drug discovery and financial modeling, optimization, cryptography and intelligent automation. Such applications reveal the revolutionary power of QNNs to tackle the issues that cannot be tackled by traditional systems. Nonetheless, there are also major obstacles on the way to a practical implementation of QNN. Problems that still remain a barrier to widespread adoption include quantum decoherence, noise in near-term quantum devices, and the inability to scale qubit architectures or to train large-scale quantum models. In order to overcome these obstacles, we speak about the current research work on the topic of error correction, variational algorithms, and hybrid system designs. Also we examine the ethical and societal ramifications of quantum-accelerated AI, such as security, data sovereignty, and technological equity globally.
The integration of quantum computing and artificial intelligence (AI) constitutes a bidirectional synergy that is reshaping both disciplines. This review investigates the reciprocal relationship in which AI addresses foundational challenges in quantum computing, while quantum computing offers the potential to advance machine learning beyond classical constraints. Recent advancements exemplify this interaction: Google DeepMind’s AlphaQubit neural network decoder has achieved state-of-the-art quantum error correction, improving performance by 6% over tensor networks and 30% over correlated matching methods. Additionally, quantum neural networks have demonstrated exponential improvements in sample complexity for specific learning tasks. This review systematically examines the current landscape of quantum-AI integration across three primary dimensions. First, it addresses AI-enhanced quantum systems, such as transformer-based error correction, reinforcement learning for circuit optimization, and AI-driven hardware calibration. Second, it explores quantum-accelerated machine learning algorithms, including variational quantum neural networks, quantum generative adversarial networks, and quantum reinforcement learning. Third, it evaluates industry deployments in sectors such as life sciences, financial services, climate modeling, and pharmaceutical development. Notable examples include IonQ’s quantum chemistry simulations, which achieved 40% efficiency improvements in carbon capture material design; St. Jude’s identification of KRAS protein inhibitors using quantum machine learning with experimental validation; and JP Morgan Chase’s implementation of quantum portfolio optimization. The analysis indicates that the field has advanced from preliminary demonstrations to production-grade applications, especially in drug discovery and molecular simulation, where quantum computing offers measurable benefits. Nevertheless, several challenges remain, including barren plateaus in variational algorithms, scalability constraints in current noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices, requirements for real-time decoding speed, and the necessity for fault-tolerant quantum computing (FTQC) systems. IBM’s 2029 roadmap, which targets 200 logical qubits capable of executing 100 million gates, together with progress in high-rate quantum low-density parity-check codes, outlines a trajectory toward practical fault tolerance. This review makes two principal research contributions: Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for Quantum Advantage Assessment: We establish the first systematic, integrated methodology for determining quantum computing feasibility that combines problem characterization, resource estimation, quantum advantage assessment, and quantum algorithm paradigm selection. This framework consolidates criteria scattered across academic literature and industry practice into a unified decision-making tool applicable across chemistry, optimization, machine learning, and simulation domains. The framework addresses a critical industry need: enabling non-expert practitioners (chemists, financial analysts, materials scientists) to objectively assess quantum computing suitability without requiring deep quantum expertise. Novel Quantum Resource Optimization Algorithms: We present three concrete algorithmic contributions advancing quantum-AI integration: • Data Encoding Efficiency Algorithm that automatically selects optimal qubit encoding strategies (amplitude vs. angle encoding) minimizing total quantum resource consumption • Error Budget Optimization Algorithm that iteratively determines optimal quantum error correction code distance balancing logical error rate targets against physical qubit overhead • Real-time Hardware Specification Aggregation from multiple quantum cloud platforms (IBM Quantum, Amazon Braket, Google, IonQ) enabling dynamic feasibility assessment as hardware capabilities evolve Combined, these contributions establish quantum computing advantage assessment as a rigorous, data-driven discipline rather than ad-hoc expert judgment. The framework enables strategic quantum computing investment decisions, accelerates problem identification for early quantum utility, and provides a reference methodology for standardizing quantum advantage evaluation across academia and industry. This review synthesizes insights from recent academic literature, industry implementations, and expert perspectives to deliver a comprehensive assessment of quantum-AI synergies grounded in this evaluation framework. The mathematical foundations, ranging from quantum Fourier transforms to Gaussian processes, are examined. Best practices for researchers and practitioners are also outlined. The findings suggest that, although universal quantum advantage has not yet been realized, domain-specific quantum-AI applications in chemistry, optimization, and sensing are achieving practical utility in 2024-2025. This development marks a significant transition from theoretical potential to commercial realization, informed by rigorous evaluation methodologies.
One of the main reasons why the physics of quantum many-body systems is hard \nlies in the curse of dimensionality: \nThe number of states of such systems increases exponentially with the number of degrees of freedom involved. \nAs a result, computations for realistic systems become intractable, \nand even numerical methods are limited to comparably small system sizes. \nMany efforts in modern physics research are therefore concerned with \nfinding efficient representations of quantum states and \nclever approximations schemes that would allow them to characterize physical systems of interest. \n \nMeanwhile, Deep Learning (DL) has solved many non-scientific problems \nthat have been unaccessible to conventional methods for a similar reason. \nThe concept underlying DL is to extract knowledge from data \nby identifying patterns and regularities. \nThe remarkable success of DL has excited many physicists about \nthe prospect of leveraging its power to solve intractable problems in physics. \nAt the same time, DL turned out to be an interesting complex many-body \nproblem in itself. \nIn contrast to its widespread empirical applications, \nthe theoretical foundation of DL is strongly underdeveloped. \nIn particular, as long as its decision-making process and result interpretability remain opaque, \nDL can not claim the status of a scientific tool. \n \nIn this thesis, I explore the interface between DL and quantum many-body physics, \nand investigate DL both as a tool and as a subject of study. \nThe first project presented here is a theory-based study of \na fundamental open question about the role of width and the number of parameters in deep neural networks. \nIn this work, we consider a DL setup for the image recognition task on standard benchmarking datasets. \nWe combine controlled experiments with a theoretical analysis, including analytical calculations for a toy model. \nThe other three works focus on the application of Restricted Boltzmann Machines as generative models \nfor the task of wavefunction reconstruction from measurement data on a quantum many-body system. \nFirst, we implement this approach as a software package, making it available as a tool for experimentalists. \nFollowing the idea that physics problems can be used to characterize DL tools, \nwe then use our extensive knowledge of this setup to conduct a systematic study of \nhow the RBM complexity scales with the complexity of the physical system. \nFinally, in a follow-up study we focus on the effects of parameter pruning techniques \non the RBM and its scaling behavior.