Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The Rochester Conferences on Coherence and Quantum Optics and the Quantum Information and Measurement meeting

Entanglement as an operational symmetry

Aaron Z. Goldberg, Jesse C. Cresswell, Ilan Tzitrin

Published Jan 1, 2019• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The ability to replicate operations on one subsystem using operations on distant subsystems is a quintessential feature of entanglement. We formalize this notion and classify the states for which it holds to shed light on quantum and classical entanglement. This leads to an operational method for quantifying the entanglement in a quantum state.

DOI
10.1364/cqo.2019.w6a.15

Related papers

Operational symmetries of entangled states

Ilan Tzitrin, Aaron Z. Goldberg, Jesse C. Cresswell

Abstract Quantum entanglement obscures the notion of local operations; there exist quantum states for which all local actions on one subsystem can be equivalently realized by actions on another. We characterize the states for which this fundamental property of entanglement does and does not hold, including multipartite and mixed states. Our results lead to a method for quantifying entanglement based on operational symmetries and has connections to quantum steering, envariance, the Reeh–Schlieder theorem, and classical entanglement.

arXiv:1906.07731•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Jan 24, 2020•5 citations

Quantum Entanglement: A Comprehensive and In-Depth Study of Theory, Experiments, Methodology, and Applications

Rajesh Kumar Verma

Quantum Entanglement-one of the weirdest and most exciting aspects of quantum mechanics. Two or more particles become entangled in a way that if the state of one of the particles is measured, then instantaneously the state of another particle is determined even if they are far apart from one another. The content of this paper explores the details of quantum entanglement: where it came from, what the basic principles are, what experiments support this notion, and what experiments we use to study entanglement. The trends of the data are laid out and what it signifies. From here, I then move to what effects quantum entanglement will have on quantum computing, cryptography and communication. I will attempt to justify my arguments through thirteen published academic sources prior to 2019.

International Journal of Advanced Research in Science Communication and Technology•Dec 30, 2020•0 citations

Observation of decoherence-induced exchange symmetry breaking in an entangled state

Hyang‐Tag Lim, Jong Chan Lee, Kang-Hee Hong +1 more

One of the most intriguing features of entanglement is that entangled quantum systems exhibit exchange symmetry; that is, local quantum operations on the subsystems may be interchanged without affecting the quantum state. In this work, we investigate whether the exchange symmetry is preserved for the weak (or partial collapse) measurement, a type of quantum operation, in the presence of decoherence. Demonstrated using two entangled photonic polarization qubits, the experimental results clearly show that the exchange symmetry is broken once decoherence is introduced, even though the photons still share nonzero entanglement. Our results shed light on quantum state manipulation using general quantum operations on entangled quantum states in the presence of decoherence.

Physical Review A•Nov 24, 2014•5 citations

Mutual Information Across Quantum Reference Frame Perspectives

Leonardo Valente, Carla Ferradini, Flaminia Giacomini +1 more

In quantum information theory, standard notions typically presuppose a fixed partition of the world into subsystems, encoded in a tensor product structure of the Hilbert space. Yet, in some scenarios, the subsystem structure is not uniquely fixed. A case in point is the description of subsystems relative to different quantum reference frames (QRFs), where the tensor product structure, although fixed in a specific QRF, changes across different QRFs. Such a relativity of subsystems underlies many interesting features of QRFs, such as the relativity of entanglement, entropy, and coherence. It also raises a broader question: how do we compare the information across different subsystem perspectives, especially when the corresponding subsystem algebras overlap? Here, we propose a notion of quantum mutual information across different QRF perspectives, which captures the correlations between subsystems relative to different frames of reference. To do so, we focus on an algebraic definition of subsystems. Studying in detail the union and overlap between subsystem algebras relative to different QRFs, we find that the usual definition of mutual information in terms of the chain law overcounts the information associated to the overlap. Based on this insight, we propose a modified chain law and show that the resulting notion of mutual information satisfies subadditivity and connects naturally to other measures found in the literature [1]. Our investigations not only provide a way to quantify the relation between different QRF perspectives from an information-theoretic point of view but also sheds light on some important features of quantum information in absence of a fixed tensor product structure.

quant-pharXiv:2610.31729•Oct 23, 2026•0 citations

Operational approach to entanglement and how to certify it

Marian Kupczyński

Entangled physical systems are an important resource in quantum information. Many papers were published trying to grasp the meaning of entanglement. It was noticed that a Hilbert space of possible state vectors of compound physical system can be partitioned by introducing various tensor product structures induced by the experimentally accessible observables (interactions and measurements). In this sense, the entanglement is relative to a particular set of experimental capabilities. Inspired by these results some authors claim that in fact all quantum states are entangled. In this paper, we show that this claim is incorrect and we discuss in operational way differences existing between separable and entangled states. A sufficient condition for entanglement is the violation of Bell–CHSH-CH inequalities and/or steering inequalities. Since there exist experiments outside the domain of quantum physics violating these inequalities therefore in the operational approach one cannot say that the entanglement is an exclusive quantum phenomenon. We also explain that an unambiguous experimental certification of the entanglement is a difficult task because classical statistical significance tests may not be trusted if sample homogeneity cannot be tested or is not tested carefully enough.

arXiv:1602.00146•International Journal of Quantum Information•May 11, 2016•13 citations

Entanglement spectra of stabilizer codes: A window into gapped quantum phases of matter

Albert T. Schmitz, Sheng-Jie Huang, Abhinav Prem

The entanglement spectrum (ES) provides a barometer of quantum entanglement and encodes physical information beyond that contained in the entanglement entropy. In this paper, we explore the ES of stabilizer codes, which furnish exactly solvable models for a plethora of gapped quantum phases of matter. Studying the ES for stabilizer Hamiltonians in the presence of arbitrary weak local perturbations thus allows us to develop a general framework within which the entanglement features of gapped topological phases can be computed and contrasted. In particular, we study models harboring fracton order, both type-I and type-II, and compare the resulting ES with that of both conventional topological order and of (strong) subsystem symmetry protected topological (SSPT) states. We find that nonlocal surface stabilizers (NLSS), a set of symmetries of the Hamiltonian which form on the boundary of the entanglement cut, act as purveyors of universal nonlocal features appearing in the entanglement spectrum. While in conventional topological orders and fracton orders, the NLSS retain a form of topological invariance with respect to the entanglement cut, subsystem symmetric systems---fracton and SSPT phases---additionally show a nontrivial geometric dependence on the entanglement cut, corresponding to the subsystem symmetry. This sheds further light on the interplay between geometric and topological effects in fracton phases of matter and demonstrates that strong SSPT phases harbour a measure of quasilocal entanglement beyond that encountered in conventional SPT phases. We further show that a version of the edge-entanglement correspondence, established earlier for gapped two-dimensional topological phases, also holds for gapped three-dimensional fracton models.

arXiv:1901.10486•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•May 8, 2019•31 citations
The ability to replicate operations on one subsystem using operations on distant subsystems is a quintessential feature of entanglement. We formalize this notion and classify the states for which it holds to shed light on quantum and classical entanglement. This leads to an operational method for quantifying the entanglement in a quantum state.
Abstract Quantum entanglement obscures the notion of local operations; there exist quantum states for which all local actions on one subsystem can be equivalently realized by actions on another. We characterize the states for which this fundamental property of entanglement does and does not hold, including multipartite and mixed states. Our results lead to a method for quantifying entanglement based on operational symmetries and has connections to quantum steering, envariance, the Reeh–Schlieder theorem, and classical entanglement.
Quantum Entanglement-one of the weirdest and most exciting aspects of quantum mechanics. Two or more particles become entangled in a way that if the state of one of the particles is measured, then instantaneously the state of another particle is determined even if they are far apart from one another. The content of this paper explores the details of quantum entanglement: where it came from, what the basic principles are, what experiments support this notion, and what experiments we use to study entanglement. The trends of the data are laid out and what it signifies. From here, I then move to what effects quantum entanglement will have on quantum computing, cryptography and communication. I will attempt to justify my arguments through thirteen published academic sources prior to 2019.
One of the most intriguing features of entanglement is that entangled quantum systems exhibit exchange symmetry; that is, local quantum operations on the subsystems may be interchanged without affecting the quantum state. In this work, we investigate whether the exchange symmetry is preserved for the weak (or partial collapse) measurement, a type of quantum operation, in the presence of decoherence. Demonstrated using two entangled photonic polarization qubits, the experimental results clearly show that the exchange symmetry is broken once decoherence is introduced, even though the photons still share nonzero entanglement. Our results shed light on quantum state manipulation using general quantum operations on entangled quantum states in the presence of decoherence.
In quantum information theory, standard notions typically presuppose a fixed partition of the world into subsystems, encoded in a tensor product structure of the Hilbert space. Yet, in some scenarios, the subsystem structure is not uniquely fixed. A case in point is the description of subsystems relative to different quantum reference frames (QRFs), where the tensor product structure, although fixed in a specific QRF, changes across different QRFs. Such a relativity of subsystems underlies many interesting features of QRFs, such as the relativity of entanglement, entropy, and coherence. It also raises a broader question: how do we compare the information across different subsystem perspectives, especially when the corresponding subsystem algebras overlap? Here, we propose a notion of quantum mutual information across different QRF perspectives, which captures the correlations between subsystems relative to different frames of reference. To do so, we focus on an algebraic definition of subsystems. Studying in detail the union and overlap between subsystem algebras relative to different QRFs, we find that the usual definition of mutual information in terms of the chain law overcounts the information associated to the overlap. Based on this insight, we propose a modified chain law and show that the resulting notion of mutual information satisfies subadditivity and connects naturally to other measures found in the literature [1]. Our investigations not only provide a way to quantify the relation between different QRF perspectives from an information-theoretic point of view but also sheds light on some important features of quantum information in absence of a fixed tensor product structure.
Entangled physical systems are an important resource in quantum information. Many papers were published trying to grasp the meaning of entanglement. It was noticed that a Hilbert space of possible state vectors of compound physical system can be partitioned by introducing various tensor product structures induced by the experimentally accessible observables (interactions and measurements). In this sense, the entanglement is relative to a particular set of experimental capabilities. Inspired by these results some authors claim that in fact all quantum states are entangled. In this paper, we show that this claim is incorrect and we discuss in operational way differences existing between separable and entangled states. A sufficient condition for entanglement is the violation of Bell–CHSH-CH inequalities and/or steering inequalities. Since there exist experiments outside the domain of quantum physics violating these inequalities therefore in the operational approach one cannot say that the entanglement is an exclusive quantum phenomenon. We also explain that an unambiguous experimental certification of the entanglement is a difficult task because classical statistical significance tests may not be trusted if sample homogeneity cannot be tested or is not tested carefully enough.
The entanglement spectrum (ES) provides a barometer of quantum entanglement and encodes physical information beyond that contained in the entanglement entropy. In this paper, we explore the ES of stabilizer codes, which furnish exactly solvable models for a plethora of gapped quantum phases of matter. Studying the ES for stabilizer Hamiltonians in the presence of arbitrary weak local perturbations thus allows us to develop a general framework within which the entanglement features of gapped topological phases can be computed and contrasted. In particular, we study models harboring fracton order, both type-I and type-II, and compare the resulting ES with that of both conventional topological order and of (strong) subsystem symmetry protected topological (SSPT) states. We find that nonlocal surface stabilizers (NLSS), a set of symmetries of the Hamiltonian which form on the boundary of the entanglement cut, act as purveyors of universal nonlocal features appearing in the entanglement spectrum. While in conventional topological orders and fracton orders, the NLSS retain a form of topological invariance with respect to the entanglement cut, subsystem symmetric systems---fracton and SSPT phases---additionally show a nontrivial geometric dependence on the entanglement cut, corresponding to the subsystem symmetry. This sheds further light on the interplay between geometric and topological effects in fracton phases of matter and demonstrates that strong SSPT phases harbour a measure of quasilocal entanglement beyond that encountered in conventional SPT phases. We further show that a version of the edge-entanglement correspondence, established earlier for gapped two-dimensional topological phases, also holds for gapped three-dimensional fracton models.