In these brief notes we want to render homage to the memory of E.C.G. Sudarshan, adding it to the many contributions devoted to preserve his memory from a personal point of view.
This writing has been prepared on the occasion of the 75th birthday of E.C.George Sudarshan, who (besides the originator of the V-A theory for weak-forces, of quantum optics --the quantum representation of coherent light--, of dynamical maps for open quantum systems, of the Zeno effect, etc.) was a pioneer, already in the sisties, also of the theory of the so-called "tachyons". This paper wishes to be a homage to E.C.G.Sudarshan, in connection with the last-mentioned pioneering work of his. After a brief theoretical introduction (based on the standard postulates of Special Relativity, and therefore extending it --or rather non-restricting it-- without any violations: for example, without any violations of the so-called Einstein causality), the main aim of this article is an updated presentation of the status-of-the-art of the "superluminal" experiments. In particular, we devote such a review to the phenomena met in tunneling through quantum (and classical) barriers [e.g., referring to the Genelalized Hartman Effect]; and in connection with the "Localized (nondiffracting) Solutions" of the wave equantions [e.g., of Maxwell equations]: especially of the "X-shaped" ones. The interested reader is provided with an extended Bibliography.
After a brief theoretical introduction (based on the standard postulates of Special Relativity, and therefore extending it --or rather non-restricting it-- without any violations: in particular without any violations of the so-called Einstein causality), the main aim of this article is an updated presentation of the status-of-the-art of the
superluminal experiments. In particular, we devote such an article to the phenomena met in tunneling through quantum (and classical) barriers [e.g., referring to the Genelalized Hartman Effect]; and in connection with the Localized (nondiffracting) Solutions of the wave equations [e.g., of Maxwell equations]: especially of the X-shaped ones. The interested reader is provided with an extended Bibliography. This paper was written as a homage to E.C.G. Sudarshan, in connection with his pioneering work on the so-called tachyons. Actually, E.C.George Sudarshan, besides the originator of the V-A theory for weak-forces, of quantum optics --the quantum representation of coherent light--, of dynamical maps for open quantum systems, of the Zeno effect, etc., was a pioneer, in the sisties, also of the theory of Tachyons.
Introduction This contribution to the book in honour of J. S. Bell will probably differ from the remaining ones, in particular since only a part of it will be devoted to specific technical arguments. In fact I have considered it appropriate to share with the community of physicists interested in the foundational problems of our best theory the repeated interactions I had with him in the last four years of his life, the deep discussions in which we have been involved in particular in connection with the elaboration of collapse theories and their interpretation, and the contributions he gave to the development of this approach at a formal level, as well as championing it on repeated occasions. In brief, I intend to play here the role of one of those lucky persons who became acquainted with him personally, who has exchanged important views with him, who has learned a lot from his deep insight and conceptual lucidity, and, last but not least, whose scientific work has been appreciated by him. Moreover, due to the fact that this book intends to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the derivation of the fundamental inequality which bears his name, I will also devote a small part of the text to recalling his clearcut views about the locality issue, views that I believe have not been grasped correctly by a remarkable part of the scientific community. I will analyze this problem in quite general terms at the end of the paper. Some of Bell's Scientific Achievements Bell received bachelor's degrees in experimental physics and in mathematical physics at Queen'sUniversity of Belfast in the years 1948 and 1949, respectively, and a PhD in physics at the University of Birmingham. We all know very well that already at that time he was absolutely unsatisfied with the conceptual structure of quantum mechanics and with the way in which it was taught. This is significantly expressed by the statement he made during an interview to Jeremy Bernstein: I remember arguing with one of my professors, a Doctor Sloane, about that. I was getting very heated and accusing him, more or less, of dishonesty. He was getting very heated too and said, ‘You're going too far.’