Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Unknow

Test of Einstein locality

Martin A. Roos

Published Nov 1, 1980• 1 citation
OpenAlex

Related papers

Tests of signal locality and Einstein-Bell locality for multiparticle systems

Shasanka Mohan Roy, Virendra Singh

For multiparticle systems we formulate the notions of signal locality (i.e., absence of faster-than-light signaling) and Einstein-Bell locality (or local realism) and obtain inequalities between experimental correlation functions to test them. Quantum theory obeys signal locality but violates Einstein-Bell locality by a factor ${2}^{(\mathit{n}\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}1)/2}$ for n-particle systems.

Physical Review Letters•Nov 11, 1991•125 citations

Einstein Locality

Henry Pierce Stapp

Compendium of Quantum Physics•Jan 1, 2009•2 citations

Tests for Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering in two-mode systems of identical massive bosons

Bryan J. Dalton, B. M. Garraway, M. D. Reid

In a previous paper tests for entanglement for two-mode systems involving identical massive bosons were obtained. In the present paper we consider sufficiency tests for Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) steering in such systems. We find that spin squeezing in any spin component, a Bloch vector test, the Hillery-Zubairy planar spin variance test, and squeezing in two-mode quadratures all show that the quantum state is EPR steerable. We also find a generalization of the Hillery-Zubairy planar spin variance test for EPR steering. The relation to previous correlation tests is discussed. This paper is based on a detailed classification of quantum states for bipartite systems. States for bipartite composite systems are categorized in quantum theory as either separable or entangled, but the states can also be divided differently into Bell local or Bell nonlocal states in terms of local hidden variable theory (LHVT). For the Bell local states there are three cases depending on whether both, one of or neither of the LHVT probabilities for each subsystem are also given by a quantum probability involving subsystem density operators. Cases where one or both are given by a quantum probability are known as local hidden states (LHSs) and such states are nonsteerable. The steerable states are the Bell local states where there is no LHS, or the Bell nonlocal states. The relationship between the quantum and hidden variable theory classification of states is discussed.

arXiv:1611.09101•Physical Review A•Jan 17, 2020•11 citations

Einstein Coefficients

Olaf Stenzel

Springer series in surface sciences•Jan 1, 2024•0 citations

Loophole-free Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen experiment via quantum steering

Bernhard Wittmann, Sven Ramelow, Fabian Steinlechner +5 more

Tests of the predictions of quantum mechanics for entangled systems have provided increasing evidence against local realistic theories. However, there remains the crucial challenge of simultaneously closing all major loopholes—the locality, freedom-of-choice and detection loopholes—in a single experiment. An important sub-class of local realistic theories can be tested with the concept of 'steering'. The term 'steering' was introduced by Schrödinger in 1935 for the fact that entanglement would seem to allow an experimenter to remotely steer the state of a distant system as in the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen (EPR) argument. Einstein called this 'spooky action at a distance'. EPR-steering has recently been rigorously formulated as a quantum information task opening it up to new experimental tests. Here, we present the first loophole-free demonstration of EPR-steering by violating three-setting quadratic steering inequality, tested with polarization-entangled photons shared between two distant laboratories. Our experiment demonstrates this effect while simultaneously closing all loopholes: both the locality loophole and a specific form of the freedom-of-choice loophole are closed by having a large separation of the parties and using fast quantum random number generators, and the fair-sampling loophole is closed by having high overall detection efficiency. Thereby, we exclude—for the first time loophole-free—an important class of local realistic theories considered by EPR. Besides its foundational importance, loophole-free steering also allows the distribution of quantum entanglement secure event in the presence of an untrusted party.

arXiv:1111.0760•New Journal of Physics•May 24, 2012•254 citations

Quantum Locality?

Henry Pierce Stapp

arXiv:1111.5364•Foundations of Physics•Feb 9, 2012•13 citations
In a previous paper tests for entanglement for two-mode systems involving identical massive bosons were obtained. In the present paper we consider sufficiency tests for Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) steering in such systems. We find that spin squeezing in any spin component, a Bloch vector test, the Hillery-Zubairy planar spin variance test, and squeezing in two-mode quadratures all show that the quantum state is EPR steerable. We also find a generalization of the Hillery-Zubairy planar spin variance test for EPR steering. The relation to previous correlation tests is discussed. This paper is based on a detailed classification of quantum states for bipartite systems. States for bipartite composite systems are categorized in quantum theory as either separable or entangled, but the states can also be divided differently into Bell local or Bell nonlocal states in terms of local hidden variable theory (LHVT). For the Bell local states there are three cases depending on whether both, one of or neither of the LHVT probabilities for each subsystem are also given by a quantum probability involving subsystem density operators. Cases where one or both are given by a quantum probability are known as local hidden states (LHSs) and such states are nonsteerable. The steerable states are the Bell local states where there is no LHS, or the Bell nonlocal states. The relationship between the quantum and hidden variable theory classification of states is discussed.
Tests of the predictions of quantum mechanics for entangled systems have provided increasing evidence against local realistic theories. However, there remains the crucial challenge of simultaneously closing all major loopholes—the locality, freedom-of-choice and detection loopholes—in a single experiment. An important sub-class of local realistic theories can be tested with the concept of 'steering'. The term 'steering' was introduced by Schrödinger in 1935 for the fact that entanglement would seem to allow an experimenter to remotely steer the state of a distant system as in the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen (EPR) argument. Einstein called this 'spooky action at a distance'. EPR-steering has recently been rigorously formulated as a quantum information task opening it up to new experimental tests. Here, we present the first loophole-free demonstration of EPR-steering by violating three-setting quadratic steering inequality, tested with polarization-entangled photons shared between two distant laboratories. Our experiment demonstrates this effect while simultaneously closing all loopholes: both the locality loophole and a specific form of the freedom-of-choice loophole are closed by having a large separation of the parties and using fast quantum random number generators, and the fair-sampling loophole is closed by having high overall detection efficiency. Thereby, we exclude—for the first time loophole-free—an important class of local realistic theories considered by EPR. Besides its foundational importance, loophole-free steering also allows the distribution of quantum entanglement secure event in the presence of an untrusted party.