Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Optimal eavesdropping in quantum cryptography with six states

Villa Gualino, Viale Settimio Severo

Published Jan 1, 2008• 1 citation
OpenAlex

Related papers

Revisiting optimal eavesdropping in quantum cryptography: Characterizing initial state and unitary evolution for optimal interaction

Atanu Acharyya, Goutam Paul

•Dec 12, 2017•0 citations

Coherent eavesdropping strategies for the four state quantum cryptography protocol

J. I. Cirac, Nicolas Gisin

arXiv:quant-ph/9702002•Physics Letters A•Apr 1, 1997•100 citations

Security Against Eavesdropping in Quantum Cryptography

Norbert Lütkenhaus, Stephen Mark Barnett

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1997•1 citation

Incoherent and coherent eavesdropping in the six-state protocol of quantum cryptography

Helle Bechmann-Pasquinucci, Nicolas Gisin

All incoherent as well as 2- and 3-qubit coherent eavesdropping strategies on the six-state protocol of quantum cryptography are classified. For a disturbance of $1/6$, the optimal incoherent eavesdropping strategy reduces to the universal quantum cloning machine. Coherent eavesdropping cannot increase Eve's Shannon information, neither on the entire string of bits, nor on the set of bits received undisturbed by Bob. However, coherent eavesdropping can increase as well Eve's Renyi information as her probability of guessing correctly all bits. The case that Eve delays the measurement of her probe until after the public discussion on error correction and privacy amplification is also considered. It is argued that by doing so, Eve gains only negligibly small additional information.

arXiv:quant-ph/9807041•Physical Review A•Jun 1, 1999•371 citations

Optimal eavesdropping in semi-quantum key distribution

Hasnaa Hajji, M. El Baz, Walter O. Krawec

Physics Letters A•Dec 3, 2025•2 citations

Optimal Eavesdropping in Quantum Cryptography with Six States

Dagmar Bruß

A generalization of the quantum cryptographic protocol by Bennett and Brassard is discussed, using three conjugate bases, i.e., six states. By calculating the optimal mutual information between sender and eavesdropper it is shown that this scheme is safer against eavesdropping on single qubits than the one based on two conjugate bases. We also address the question for a connection between the maximal classical correlation in a generalized Bell inequality and the intersection of mutual informations between sender/receiver and sender/eavesdropper.

arXiv:quant-ph/9805019•Physical Review Letters•Oct 5, 1998•868 citations
All incoherent as well as 2- and 3-qubit coherent eavesdropping strategies on the six-state protocol of quantum cryptography are classified. For a disturbance of 1/61/61/6, the optimal incoherent eavesdropping strategy reduces to the universal quantum cloning machine. Coherent eavesdropping cannot increase Eve's Shannon information, neither on the entire string of bits, nor on the set of bits received undisturbed by Bob. However, coherent eavesdropping can increase as well Eve's Renyi information as her probability of guessing correctly all bits. The case that Eve delays the measurement of her probe until after the public discussion on error correction and privacy amplification is also considered. It is argued that by doing so, Eve gains only negligibly small additional information.
A generalization of the quantum cryptographic protocol by Bennett and Brassard is discussed, using three conjugate bases, i.e., six states. By calculating the optimal mutual information between sender and eavesdropper it is shown that this scheme is safer against eavesdropping on single qubits than the one based on two conjugate bases. We also address the question for a connection between the maximal classical correlation in a generalized Bell inequality and the intersection of mutual informations between sender/receiver and sender/eavesdropper.