Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Communications in computer and information science

Brain Research and Arbitrary Multiscale Quantum Uncertainty

Rodolfo A. Fiorini

Published Jan 1, 2019• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-981-15-1398-5_11

Related papers

Quantum–Photonic Topological Intelligence for Multiscale Biomedicine: Brain Networks, Biosignals, Spatial Multi-Omics and Autonomous Therapeutics

Murali Krishna Pasupuleti

Abstract: Biomedical intelligence increasingly depends on integrating data that are heterogeneous not only in format but also in biological scale: dynamic brain networks, high-frequency physiological signals, spatially resolved molecular measurements and treatment-response trajectories. This paper develops a unified conceptual and mathematical architecture—Quantum–Photonic Topological Intelligence for Multiscale Biomedicine (QPTI-MB)—for representing, fusing and governing these data without reducing clinically important structure to a single flat feature space. The proposed framework combines graph and simplicial representations, persistent topological descriptors, multimodal learning, hybrid quantum–photonic feature maps and constrained therapeutic optimization. The methodology is model-based. No patient-level dataset is supplied; therefore, the study uses an explicitly illustrative 0–10 numerical scoring model and does not claim empirical clinical superiority. The framework formalizes four coupled layers: topology-preserving biomedical encoding, quantum–photonic representation, uncertainty-aware cross-modal fusion and benefit–risk–cost constrained therapeutic decision support. A risk-adjusted composite score demonstrates how technical capability can be discounted by uncertainty, bias and translational risk. The analysis indicates that the value of the architecture lies less in any single computational technology than in disciplined multiscale coupling: persistent representations can stabilize structural information across sampling regimes; multimodal fusion can connect electrophysiology with spatial molecular states; and governed optimization can transform predictions into constrained therapeutic recommendations. The paper contributes a named framework, equations, variables, validation logic, scenario analysis and a translational roadmap. Future empirical work should benchmark classical, topological, quantum-inspired and quantum–photonic components under matched datasets, prospective validation, fairness constraints and clinically meaningful endpoints before any claim of deployment advantage is made. Keywords: quantum photonics; topological data analysis; persistent homology; brain connectivity; EEG; ECG; spatial multi-omics; precision oncology; multimodal learning; quantum neural networks; biomedical signal intelligence; uncertainty quantification; autonomous therapeutics; precision medicine; explainable clinical AI

International Journal of Academic and Industrial Research Innovations(IJAIRI)•Aug 29, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Measurement by Quantum Brain

Mari Jibu, Kunio Yasue

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1995•1 citation

Quantum-Brain Claims Lack Novel Mathematics: A Source Analysis — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

FINDING: No primary research is presented; results are video titles and one systems-biology methods paper, none containing novel quantum-brain mathematics. The only mathematical content is Bayesian uncertainty analysis for biological models. | MATH: No equations, constants, or ratios are extractable from the quantum-brain sources. The arXiv paper (1607.06358) concerns Gaussian process emulation and Bayesian global parameter searches — generic statistical machinery, no quantum or geometric constants. | CONNECTION: None. No occurrence of 0.382, 0.618, 0.786, 1.618, 2.618, base-60, crystallographic symmetries, root systems, or lattice structures appears in any cited source. | DEPTH: 1 — The search returned popular-science videos and an unrelated methodology paper. No verifiable mathematical finding, no new equation, no geometric link. The claim of "quantum effects in brain" is not substantiated by any equation or constant in the provided material. Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Oct 24, 2026•0 citations

Quantum physics and the biological brain

Florian Neukart

Springer eBooks•Oct 24, 2016•3 citations

Quantum brain dynamics

Mari Jibu, Kunio Yasue

Advances in consciousness research•Oct 12, 2001•5 citations

Brain Modeling, Spacetime Splitting and Computer Science

Rodolfo A. Fiorini

In different paper, we already discussed the major intrinsic limitations of "Science 1.0" brain arbitrary multiscale (AMS) modeling and strategies to get better simulation results by "Science 2.0" approach. This change of paradigm has not yet been completely grasped by many contemporary scientific disciplines and current researchers, so that not all the implications of this big change have been realized hitherto, even less their related, vital applications. The fact that we can build devices that implement the same basic operations as those the nervous system uses leads to the inevitable conclusion that we should be able to build entire systems based on the organizing principles used by the nervous system. Nevertheless, the human brain is at least a factor of 1 billion more efficient than our present digital technology, and a factor of 10 million more efficient than the best digital technology that we can imagine. The unavoidable conclusion is that we have something fundamental to learn from the brain and biology about new and much more effective form of computation. Thus, one of the key questions in understanding the quantum-classical transition is what happens to the superposition as you go up that atoms-to-apple scale. Exactly when and how does "both/and" become "either/or"? As a sound example, we present and discuss the observer space-time splitting case. In other words, we show spacetime mapping to classical system additive representation with loss of overall system fundamental information. It is exactly at this point that "both/and" becomes "either/or" representation by usual Science 1.0 approach. CICT new awareness of a discrete HG (hyperbolic geometry) subspace (reciprocal space) of coded heterogeneous hyperbolic structures, underlying the familiar Q Euclidean (direct space) surface representation can open the way to holographic information geometry (HIG) to recover lost coherence information. CICT can help us to develop strategies to gather much more reliable experimental information from single experimentation and to keep overall system information coherence. In this way, coherent representation precision leads to information conservation and clarity. This paper is a relevant contribute towards an effective and convenient "Science 2.0" universal framework to develop computer science innovative application and beyond.

•Jan 1, 2015•2 citations
Abstract: Biomedical intelligence increasingly depends on integrating data that are heterogeneous not only in format but also in biological scale: dynamic brain networks, high-frequency physiological signals, spatially resolved molecular measurements and treatment-response trajectories. This paper develops a unified conceptual and mathematical architecture—Quantum–Photonic Topological Intelligence for Multiscale Biomedicine (QPTI-MB)—for representing, fusing and governing these data without reducing clinically important structure to a single flat feature space. The proposed framework combines graph and simplicial representations, persistent topological descriptors, multimodal learning, hybrid quantum–photonic feature maps and constrained therapeutic optimization. The methodology is model-based. No patient-level dataset is supplied; therefore, the study uses an explicitly illustrative 0–10 numerical scoring model and does not claim empirical clinical superiority. The framework formalizes four coupled layers: topology-preserving biomedical encoding, quantum–photonic representation, uncertainty-aware cross-modal fusion and benefit–risk–cost constrained therapeutic decision support. A risk-adjusted composite score demonstrates how technical capability can be discounted by uncertainty, bias and translational risk. The analysis indicates that the value of the architecture lies less in any single computational technology than in disciplined multiscale coupling: persistent representations can stabilize structural information across sampling regimes; multimodal fusion can connect electrophysiology with spatial molecular states; and governed optimization can transform predictions into constrained therapeutic recommendations. The paper contributes a named framework, equations, variables, validation logic, scenario analysis and a translational roadmap. Future empirical work should benchmark classical, topological, quantum-inspired and quantum–photonic components under matched datasets, prospective validation, fairness constraints and clinically meaningful endpoints before any claim of deployment advantage is made. Keywords: quantum photonics; topological data analysis; persistent homology; brain connectivity; EEG; ECG; spatial multi-omics; precision oncology; multimodal learning; quantum neural networks; biomedical signal intelligence; uncertainty quantification; autonomous therapeutics; precision medicine; explainable clinical AI
FINDING: No primary research is presented; results are video titles and one systems-biology methods paper, none containing novel quantum-brain mathematics. The only mathematical content is Bayesian uncertainty analysis for biological models. | MATH: No equations, constants, or ratios are extractable from the quantum-brain sources. The arXiv paper (1607.06358) concerns Gaussian process emulation and Bayesian global parameter searches — generic statistical machinery, no quantum or geometric constants. | CONNECTION: None. No occurrence of 0.382, 0.618, 0.786, 1.618, 2.618, base-60, crystallographic symmetries, root systems, or lattice structures appears in any cited source. | DEPTH: 1 — The search returned popular-science videos and an unrelated methodology paper. No verifiable mathematical finding, no new equation, no geometric link. The claim of "quantum effects in brain" is not substantiated by any equation or constant in the provided material. Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
In different paper, we already discussed the major intrinsic limitations of "Science 1.0" brain arbitrary multiscale (AMS) modeling and strategies to get better simulation results by "Science 2.0" approach. This change of paradigm has not yet been completely grasped by many contemporary scientific disciplines and current researchers, so that not all the implications of this big change have been realized hitherto, even less their related, vital applications. The fact that we can build devices that implement the same basic operations as those the nervous system uses leads to the inevitable conclusion that we should be able to build entire systems based on the organizing principles used by the nervous system. Nevertheless, the human brain is at least a factor of 1 billion more efficient than our present digital technology, and a factor of 10 million more efficient than the best digital technology that we can imagine. The unavoidable conclusion is that we have something fundamental to learn from the brain and biology about new and much more effective form of computation. Thus, one of the key questions in understanding the quantum-classical transition is what happens to the superposition as you go up that atoms-to-apple scale. Exactly when and how does "both/and" become "either/or"? As a sound example, we present and discuss the observer space-time splitting case. In other words, we show spacetime mapping to classical system additive representation with loss of overall system fundamental information. It is exactly at this point that "both/and" becomes "either/or" representation by usual Science 1.0 approach. CICT new awareness of a discrete HG (hyperbolic geometry) subspace (reciprocal space) of coded heterogeneous hyperbolic structures, underlying the familiar Q Euclidean (direct space) surface representation can open the way to holographic information geometry (HIG) to recover lost coherence information. CICT can help us to develop strategies to gather much more reliable experimental information from single experimentation and to keep overall system information coherence. In this way, coherent representation precision leads to information conservation and clarity. This paper is a relevant contribute towards an effective and convenient "Science 2.0" universal framework to develop computer science innovative application and beyond.