Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Bridge Analytics II: Combinatorial Chaining for Asset Exchange.

Fred Glover, Gary A. Kochenberger, Moses Ma, Yu Du

Published Nov 8, 2019• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

Quantum Bridge Analytics relates to methods and systems for hybrid classical-quantum computing and is devoted to developing tools for bridging classical and quantum computing to gain the benefits of their alliance in the present and enable enhanced practical application of quantum computing in the future. This is the second of a two-part tutorial that surveys key elements of Quantum Bridge Analytics and its applications. Part I focused on the Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) model which is presently the most widely applied optimization model in the quantum computing area, and which unifies a rich variety of combinatorial optimization problems. Part II (the present paper) examines an application that augments the use of QUBO models, by disclosing a context for coordinating QUBO solutions through a model we call the Asset Exchange Problem (AEP). Solutions to the AEP enable individuals or institutions to take fuller advantage of solutions to their QUBO models by exchanges of assets that benefit all participants. Such exchanges are generated by an approach called combinatorial chaining, which provides a flexibility to solve AEP variants that open the door to additional links to quantum computing applications. Examples are presented that show the nature of these processes from a tutorial perspective.

Related papers

Quantum Bridge Analytics II: Network Optimization and Combinatorial Chaining for Asset Exchange

Fred Glover, Gary A. Kochenberger, Moses Ma +1 more

Quantum Bridge Analytics relates to methods and systems for hybrid classical-quantum computing, and is devoted to developing tools for bridging classical and quantum computing to gain the benefits of their alliance in the present and enable enhanced practical application of quantum computing in the future. This is the second of a two-part tutorial that surveys key elements of Quantum Bridge Analytics and its applications. Part I focused on the Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) model which is presently the most widely applied optimization model in the quantum computing area, and which unifies a rich variety of combinatorial optimization problems. Part II (the present paper) examines an application that augments the use of QUBO models, by disclosing a context for coordinating QUBO solutions through a model we call the Asset Exchange Problem (AEP). Solutions to the AEP enable individuals or institutions to take fuller advantage of solutions to their QUBO models by exchanges of assets that benefit all participants. Such exchanges are generated by a combination of two optimization technologies, one grounded in network optimization and one based on a new metaheuristic optimization approach called combinatorial chaining. This combination provides a flexibility to solve AEP variants that open the door to additional links to quantum computing applications and additional applications via the Quantum Bridge Analytics perspective. We show how this modeling and solution capability gives rise to an Asset Exchange Technology that embraces a broad range of financial, industrial, scientific and social settings. Examples are presented that show the nature of these processes from a tutorial perspective.

arXiv:1911.03036•Jan 1, 2019•0 citations

Quantum Bridge Analytics II

Sharif Uddin Ahmed Rana, Adrian David Cheok

Quantum Bridge Analytics relates to methods and systems for hybrid classical-quantum computing and is devoted to developing tools for bridging classical and quantum computing to gain the benefits of their alliance in the present and enable enhanced practical application of quantum computing in the future. This is the second of a two-part tutorial that surveys key elements of Quantum Bridge Analytics and its applications. Part I focused on the Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) model which is presently the most widely applied optimization model in the quantum computing area, and which unifies a rich variety of combinatorial optimization problems. Part II (the present paper) introduces the domain of QUBO-Plus models that enables a larger range of problems to be handled effectively. After illustrating the scope of these QUBO-Plus models with examples, we give special attention to an importance instance of these models called the Asset Exchange Problem (AEP).

Advances in logistics, operations, and management science book series•Sep 27, 2024•0 citations

A Tutorial on Formulating and Using QUBO Models

Fred Glover, Gary A. Kochenberger, Yu Du

The Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) model has gained prominence in recent years with the discovery that it unifies a rich variety of combinatorial optimization problems. By its association with the Ising problem in physics, the QUBO model has emerged as an underpinning of the quantum computing area known as quantum annealing and has become a subject of study in neuromorphic computing. Through these connections, QUBO models lie at the heart of experimentation carried out with quantum computers developed by D-Wave Systems and neuromorphic computers developed by IBM. Computational experience is being amassed by both the classical and the quantum computing communities that highlights not only the potential of the QUBO model but also its effectiveness as an alternative to traditional modeling and solution methodologies. This tutorial discloses the basic features of the QUBO model that give it the power and flexibility to encompass the range of applications that have thrust it onto center stage of the optimization field. We show how many different types of constraining relationships arising in practice can be embodied within the "unconstrained" QUBO formulation in a very natural manner using penalty functions, yielding exact model representations in contrast to the approximate representations produced by customary uses of penalty functions. Each step of generating such models is illustrated in detail by simple numerical examples, to highlight the convenience of using QUBO models in numerous settings. We also describe recent innovations for solving QUBO models that offer a fertile avenue for integrating classical and quantum computing and for applying these models in machine learning.

arXiv:1811.11538•Nov 13, 2018•164 citations

Quantum Bridge Analytics II: QUBO-Plus, network optimization and combinatorial chaining for asset exchange

Fred Glover, Gary A. Kochenberger, Moses Ma +1 more

4OR•Dec 1, 2020•16 citations

Quantum Bridge Analytics II: QUBO-Plus, network optimization and combinatorial chaining for asset exchange

Fred Glover, Gary A. Kochenberger, Moses Ma +1 more

Annals of Operations Research•May 2, 2022•30 citations

A Tutorial on Formulating QUBO Models.

Fred Glover, Gary A. Kochenberger

The field of Combinatorial Optimization (CO) is one of the most important areas in the general field of optimization, with important applications found in every industry, including both the private and public sectors. It is also one of the most active research areas pursued by the research communities of Operations Research, Computer Science, and Analytics as they work to design and test new methods for solving real world CO problems. In recent years, we have discovered that a mathematical formulation known as QUBO, an acronym for a Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization problem, can embrace a large variety of important CO problems found in industry and government. Through special reformulation techniques that are easy to apply, the power of QUBO solvers can be used to efficiently solve many important problems once they are put into the QUBO framework. This two-step process of first re-casting an original model into the form of a QUBO model and then solving it with appropriate software enables the QUBO model to become a unifying framework for combinatorial optimization. The alternative path that results for effectively modeling and solving many important problems is a new development in the field of combinatorial optimization. The materials provided in subsequent sections illustrate the process of reformulating important optimization problems as QUBO models through a series of explicit examples. Collectively these examples highlight the application breadth of the QUBO model. We do not focus here on modeling a given problem in the form classically adopted in the optimization community. Rather, our examples disclose the methods that can be used to recast a given problem, perhaps existing in a classical mathematical form, into an equivalent QUBO model.

•Nov 13, 2018•24 citations
Quantum Bridge Analytics relates to methods and systems for hybrid classical-quantum computing and is devoted to developing tools for bridging classical and quantum computing to gain the benefits of their alliance in the present and enable enhanced practical application of quantum computing in the future.
This is the second of a two-part tutorial that surveys key elements of Quantum Bridge Analytics and its applications. Part I focused on the Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) model which is presently the most widely applied optimization model in the quantum computing area, and which unifies a rich variety of combinatorial optimization problems.
Part II (the present paper) examines an application that augments the use of QUBO models, by disclosing a context for coordinating QUBO solutions through a model we call the Asset Exchange Problem (AEP). Solutions to the AEP enable individuals or institutions to take fuller advantage of solutions to their QUBO models by exchanges of assets that benefit all participants. Such exchanges are generated by an approach called combinatorial chaining, which provides a flexibility to solve AEP variants that open the door to additional links to quantum computing applications. Examples are presented that show the nature of these processes from a tutorial perspective.
Quantum Bridge Analytics relates to methods and systems for hybrid classical-quantum computing, and is devoted to developing tools for bridging classical and quantum computing to gain the benefits of their alliance in the present and enable enhanced practical application of quantum computing in the future. This is the second of a two-part tutorial that surveys key elements of Quantum Bridge Analytics and its applications. Part I focused on the Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) model which is presently the most widely applied optimization model in the quantum computing area, and which unifies a rich variety of combinatorial optimization problems. Part II (the present paper) examines an application that augments the use of QUBO models, by disclosing a context for coordinating QUBO solutions through a model we call the Asset Exchange Problem (AEP). Solutions to the AEP enable individuals or institutions to take fuller advantage of solutions to their QUBO models by exchanges of assets that benefit all participants. Such exchanges are generated by a combination of two optimization technologies, one grounded in network optimization and one based on a new metaheuristic optimization approach called combinatorial chaining. This combination provides a flexibility to solve AEP variants that open the door to additional links to quantum computing applications and additional applications via the Quantum Bridge Analytics perspective. We show how this modeling and solution capability gives rise to an Asset Exchange Technology that embraces a broad range of financial, industrial, scientific and social settings. Examples are presented that show the nature of these processes from a tutorial perspective.
Quantum Bridge Analytics relates to methods and systems for hybrid classical-quantum computing and is devoted to developing tools for bridging classical and quantum computing to gain the benefits of their alliance in the present and enable enhanced practical application of quantum computing in the future. This is the second of a two-part tutorial that surveys key elements of Quantum Bridge Analytics and its applications. Part I focused on the Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) model which is presently the most widely applied optimization model in the quantum computing area, and which unifies a rich variety of combinatorial optimization problems. Part II (the present paper) introduces the domain of QUBO-Plus models that enables a larger range of problems to be handled effectively. After illustrating the scope of these QUBO-Plus models with examples, we give special attention to an importance instance of these models called the Asset Exchange Problem (AEP).
The Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) model has gained prominence in recent years with the discovery that it unifies a rich variety of combinatorial optimization problems. By its association with the Ising problem in physics, the QUBO model has emerged as an underpinning of the quantum computing area known as quantum annealing and has become a subject of study in neuromorphic computing. Through these connections, QUBO models lie at the heart of experimentation carried out with quantum computers developed by D-Wave Systems and neuromorphic computers developed by IBM. Computational experience is being amassed by both the classical and the quantum computing communities that highlights not only the potential of the QUBO model but also its effectiveness as an alternative to traditional modeling and solution methodologies. This tutorial discloses the basic features of the QUBO model that give it the power and flexibility to encompass the range of applications that have thrust it onto center stage of the optimization field. We show how many different types of constraining relationships arising in practice can be embodied within the "unconstrained" QUBO formulation in a very natural manner using penalty functions, yielding exact model representations in contrast to the approximate representations produced by customary uses of penalty functions. Each step of generating such models is illustrated in detail by simple numerical examples, to highlight the convenience of using QUBO models in numerous settings. We also describe recent innovations for solving QUBO models that offer a fertile avenue for integrating classical and quantum computing and for applying these models in machine learning.
The field of Combinatorial Optimization (CO) is one of the most important areas in the general field of optimization, with important applications found in every industry, including both the private and public sectors. It is also one of the most active research areas pursued by the research communities of Operations Research, Computer Science, and Analytics as they work to design and test new methods for solving real world CO problems. In recent years, we have discovered that a mathematical formulation known as QUBO, an acronym for a Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization problem, can embrace a large variety of important CO problems found in industry and government. Through special reformulation techniques that are easy to apply, the power of QUBO solvers can be used to efficiently solve many important problems once they are put into the QUBO framework. This two-step process of first re-casting an original model into the form of a QUBO model and then solving it with appropriate software enables the QUBO model to become a unifying framework for combinatorial optimization. The alternative path that results for effectively modeling and solving many important problems is a new development in the field of combinatorial optimization. The materials provided in subsequent sections illustrate the process of reformulating important optimization problems as QUBO models through a series of explicit examples. Collectively these examples highlight the application breadth of the QUBO model. We do not focus here on modeling a given problem in the form classically adopted in the optimization community. Rather, our examples disclose the methods that can be used to recast a given problem, perhaps existing in a classical mathematical form, into an equivalent QUBO model.