Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Mathematica Bohemica

Concrete quantum logics with generalised compatibility

Josef Tkadlec

Published Jan 1, 1998• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

We present three results stating when a concrete (=set-representable) quantum logic with covering properties (generalization of compatibility) has to be a Boolean algebra. These results complete and generalize some previous results [3, 5] and answer partiallz a question posed in [2].
DOI
10.21136/mb.1998.126300

Related papers

On the concreteness of quantum logics

Pavel Pták, J. D. Maitland Wright

It is shown that for any quantum logic $L$ one can find a concrete logic $K$ and a surjective homomorphism $f$ from $K$ onto $L$ such that $f$ maps the centre of $K$ onto the centre of $L$. Moreover, one can ensure that each finite set of compatible elements in $L$ is the image of a compatible subset of $K$. This result is "best possible" - let a logic $L$ be the homomorphic image of a concrete logic under a homomorphism such that, if $F$ is a finite subset of the pre-image of a compatible subset of $L$, then $F$ is compatible. Then $L$ must be concrete. In the second part one considers embeddings into concrete logics. It is shown that any concrete logic can be embedded into a concrete logic with preassigned centre and an abundance of two-valued measures. Finally, one proves that an arbitrary logic can be mapped into a concrete logic by a centrally additive mapping which preserves the ordering and complementation.

Applications of Mathematics•Jan 1, 1985•8 citations

Quantum Logics with Lattice State Spaces

Jiří Binder, Mirko Navara

Let $L$ be a quantum logic and let $S(L)$ denote the set of all states on $L$. (By a state we mean a nonnegative bounded $\sigma$-additive measure, not necessarily normalized.) We ask whether every logic whose state space is a lattice has to be Boolean. We prove that this is so for finite logics and "projection logics." On the other hand, we show that there exist even concrete non-Boolean logics with a lattice state space (in fact, we prove that every countable concrete logic can be enlarged to a logic with a lattice state space). In the appendix we shortly consider the lattice properties of the set of observables and correct the paper [10].

Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society•Jan 1, 1987•5 citations

Compatibility in quantum structures

Josef Tkadlec

Compatibilty play an important role in the axiomatics of quantum structures and has been studied extensively. We present some recent results concerning compatibility in quantum structures, their consequences to the axiomatics and their relationship to previous achievements. We show, e.g., that a residuated orthomodular lattice is a Boolean algebra.

•Jan 1, 2004•0 citations

The universal logic of repeated experiments

Sergio Daniel Grillo

Let $\mathsf{E}$ be the event space of an experiment that can be indefinitely repeated. A natural question arises: given a countable cardinal $κ$, which is the event space of the $κ$-times repeated experiment? In the case of classical experiments, where $\mathsf{E}$ is a (complete) Boolean algebra on some set $S$, i.e. a classical or distributive logic, the answer is more or less known: the (complete) Boolean algebra on $S^κ$ generated by $\mathsf{E}^κ$. But, what if $\mathsf{E}$ is not a Boolean algebra? In this paper we give a constructive answer to this question for any $κ$ and in the context of general orthocomplemented complete lattices, i.e. general logics. Concretely, given a general logic $\mathsf{E}$ defining the event space of a given experiment, we construct a logic $\mathsf{U}_κ\left(\mathsf{E}\right)$ representing the event space of the $κ$-times repeated experiment, in such a way that $\mathsf{U}_κ\left(\mathsf{E}\right)$ and $\mathsf{E}$ are isomorphic if $κ=1$, and such that $\mathsf{U}_κ\left(\mathsf{E}\right)$ is distributive if and only if so is $\mathsf{E}$. We also extend our construction to the case in which the event space changes from one repetition to another and the cardinal $κ$ is arbitrary. This gives rise to tensor products $\bigotimes_{α\inκ}\mathsf{E}_α$ of families $\left\{ \mathsf{E}_α\right\} _{α\inκ}$ of orthocomplemented complete lattices, in terms of which $\mathsf{U}_κ\left(\mathsf{E}\right)=\bigotimes_{α\inκ}\mathsf{E}$.

arXiv:2601.00118•Dec 31, 2025•0 citations

Logical structures underlying quantum computing

Federico Holik, Giuseppe Sergioli, Héctor Freytes +1 more

In this work we advance a generalization of quantum computational logics capable of dealing with some important examples of quantum algorithms. We outline an algebraic axiomatization of these structures.

•Jan 1, 2019•6 citations

On orthoposets of numerical events in quantum logic

Dietmar Dorninger, Helmut Länger

Let S be a set of states of a physical system and p(s) the probability of the occurrence of an event when the system is in state s in S. Such a function p from S to [0,1] is known as a numerical event or more accurately an S-probability. A set P of numerical events including the constant functions 0 and 1 and 1-p with every p in P becomes a poset when ordered by the order of real functions and can serve as a general setting for quantum logics. We call such a poset P a general set of events (GSE). The thoroughly investigated algebras of S-probabilities (including Hilbert logics), concrete logics and Boolean algebras can all be represented within this setting. In this paper we study various classes of GSEs, in particular those that are orthoposets and their interrelations and connections to known logics. Moreover, we characterize GSEs as posets by means of states and discuss the situation for GSEs to be lattices.

quant-pharXiv:2601.00772•Reports on Mathematical Physics•Jan 5, 2026•0 citations
It is shown that for any quantum logic LLL one can find a concrete logic KKK and a surjective homomorphism fff from KKK onto LLL such that fff maps the centre of KKK onto the centre of LLL. Moreover, one can ensure that each finite set of compatible elements in LLL is the image of a compatible subset of KKK. This result is "best possible" - let a logic LLL be the homomorphic image of a concrete logic under a homomorphism such that, if FFF is a finite subset of the pre-image of a compatible subset of LLL, then FFF is compatible. Then LLL must be concrete. In the second part one considers embeddings into concrete logics. It is shown that any concrete logic can be embedded into a concrete logic with preassigned centre and an abundance of two-valued measures. Finally, one proves that an arbitrary logic can be mapped into a concrete logic by a centrally additive mapping which preserves the ordering and complementation.
Let LLL be a quantum logic and let S(L)S(L)S(L) denote the set of all states on LLL. (By a state we mean a nonnegative bounded σ\sigmaσ-additive measure, not necessarily normalized.) We ask whether every logic whose state space is a lattice has to be Boolean. We prove that this is so for finite logics and "projection logics." On the other hand, we show that there exist even concrete non-Boolean logics with a lattice state space (in fact, we prove that every countable concrete logic can be enlarged to a logic with a lattice state space). In the appendix we shortly consider the lattice properties of the set of observables and correct the paper [10].
Let E\mathsf{E}E be the event space of an experiment that can be indefinitely repeated. A natural question arises: given a countable cardinal κκκ, which is the event space of the κκκ-times repeated experiment? In the case of classical experiments, where E\mathsf{E}E is a (complete) Boolean algebra on some set SSS, i.e. a classical or distributive logic, the answer is more or less known: the (complete) Boolean algebra on SκS^κSκ generated by Eκ\mathsf{E}^κEκ. But, what if E\mathsf{E}E is not a Boolean algebra? In this paper we give a constructive answer to this question for any κκκ and in the context of general orthocomplemented complete lattices, i.e. general logics. Concretely, given a general logic E\mathsf{E}E defining the event space of a given experiment, we construct a logic Uκ(E)\mathsf{U}_κ\left(\mathsf{E}\right)Uκ​(E) representing the event space of the κκκ-times repeated experiment, in such a way that Uκ(E)\mathsf{U}_κ\left(\mathsf{E}\right)Uκ​(E) and E\mathsf{E}E are isomorphic if κ=1κ=1κ=1, and such that Uκ(E)\mathsf{U}_κ\left(\mathsf{E}\right)Uκ​(E) is distributive if and only if so is E\mathsf{E}E. We also extend our construction to the case in which the event space changes from one repetition to another and the cardinal κκκ is arbitrary. This gives rise to tensor products ⨂α∈κEα\bigotimes_{α\inκ}\mathsf{E}_α⨂α∈κ​Eα​ of families {Eα}α∈κ\left\{ \mathsf{E}_α\right\} _{α\inκ}{Eα​}α∈κ​ of orthocomplemented complete lattices, in terms of which Uκ(E)=⨂α∈κE\mathsf{U}_κ\left(\mathsf{E}\right)=\bigotimes_{α\inκ}\mathsf{E}Uκ​(E)=⨂α∈κ​E.
Let S be a set of states of a physical system and p(s) the probability of the occurrence of an event when the system is in state s in S. Such a function p from S to [0,1] is known as a numerical event or more accurately an S-probability. A set P of numerical events including the constant functions 0 and 1 and 1-p with every p in P becomes a poset when ordered by the order of real functions and can serve as a general setting for quantum logics. We call such a poset P a general set of events (GSE). The thoroughly investigated algebras of S-probabilities (including Hilbert logics), concrete logics and Boolean algebras can all be represented within this setting. In this paper we study various classes of GSEs, in particular those that are orthoposets and their interrelations and connections to known logics. Moreover, we characterize GSEs as posets by means of states and discuss the situation for GSEs to be lattices.