Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Soft-In/Soft-Out Decoding of Reed-Muller-Codes based on the Plotkin-Construction

Armin Dammann

Published Jan 1, 2002• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Soft-Input Soft-Output Decoding Algorithm Based on Iterative Minimum Distance Search for Reed-Muller Codes

Jun Asatani, Takuya Koumoto, Toru Fujiwara +1 more

IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)•Dec 15, 2003•0 citations

Constituent Automorphism Decoding of Reed-Muller Codes

Yicheng Qu, Amir Tasbihi, Frank R. Kschischang

Automorphism-ensemble decoding is applied to the Plotkin constituents of Reed-Muller codes, resulting in a new soft-decision decoding algorithm with state-of-the-art performance versus complexity trade-offs.

arXiv:2409.03700•IEEE Transactions on Communications•Jan 29, 2025•4 citations

Recursive List Decoding for Reed-Muller Codes and Their Subcodes

Ilya I. Dumer, Kirill Shabunov

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2002•8 citations

Recursive decoding of Reed-Muller codes

Ilya I. Dumer

New soft- and hard decision decoding algorithms are presented for general Reed-Muller codes $\left\{\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{m}{r}\right\} $ of length $2^{m}$ and distance $2^{m-r}$. We use Plotkin $(u,u+v)$ construction and decompose code $\left\{\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{m}{r}\right\} $ onto subblocks $u\in\left\{\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{m-1}{r}\right\} $ and $v\in\left\{\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{m-1}{r-1}\right\} .$ In decoding, we first try to find a subblock $v$ from the better protected code and then proceed with the block $u$. The likelihoods of the received symbols are recalculated in a way similar to belief propagation. Thus, decoding is relegated to the two constituent codes. We repeat this recursion and execute decoding only at the end nodes $\left\{\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{j}{1}\right\} $ and $\left\{\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{j}{j-1}\right\} $. The overall complexity has low order of $n\log n.$ It is shown that this decoding substantially outperforms other algorithms of polynomial complexity known for RM codes. In particular, for medium and high code rates, the algorithm corrects most error patterns of weight $d\ln d/2.$

arXiv:1703.05303•Mar 14, 2017•4 citations

Improved Decoding Algorithm for High Reliable Reed Muller Coding

Costas, Argyrides, Dhiraj K. Pradhan

•Jan 1, 2007•0 citations

Soft-input decoding of concatenated codes based on the Plotkin construction and BCH component codes

Daniel Nicolas Bailon, Johann-Philipp Thiers, Jürgen Freudenberger

Low latency communication requires soft-input decoding of binary block codes with small to medium block lengths. In this work, we consider generalized multiple concatenated (GMC) codes based on the Plotkin construction. These codes are similar to Reed-Muller (RM) codes. In contrast to RM codes, BCH codes are employed as component codes. This leads to improved code parameters. Moreover, a decoding algorithm is proposed that exploits the recursive structure of the concatenation. This algorithm enables efficient soft-input decoding of binary block codes with small to medium lengths. The proposed codes and their decoding achieve significant performance gains compared with RM codes and recursive GMC decoding.

International Conference on Consumer Electronics•Nov 9, 2020•2 citations
New soft- and hard decision decoding algorithms are presented for general Reed-Muller codes $\left\{\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{m}{r}\right\} $ of length 2m2^{m}2m and distance 2m−r2^{m-r}2m−r. We use Plotkin (u,u+v)(u,u+v)(u,u+v) construction and decompose code $\left\{\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{m}{r}\right\} $ onto subblocks $u\in\left\{\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{m-1}{r}\right\} $ and v∈{m−1r−1}.v\in\left\{\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{m-1}{r-1}\right\} .v∈{r−1m−1​}. In decoding, we first try to find a subblock vvv from the better protected code and then proceed with the block uuu. The likelihoods of the received symbols are recalculated in a way similar to belief propagation. Thus, decoding is relegated to the two constituent codes. We repeat this recursion and execute decoding only at the end nodes $\left\{\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{j}{1}\right\} $ and $\left\{\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{j}{j-1}\right\} $. The overall complexity has low order of nlog⁡n.n\log n.nlogn. It is shown that this decoding substantially outperforms other algorithms of polynomial complexity known for RM codes. In particular, for medium and high code rates, the algorithm corrects most error patterns of weight dln⁡d/2.d\ln d/2.dlnd/2.
Low latency communication requires soft-input decoding of binary block codes with small to medium block lengths. In this work, we consider generalized multiple concatenated (GMC) codes based on the Plotkin construction. These codes are similar to Reed-Muller (RM) codes. In contrast to RM codes, BCH codes are employed as component codes. This leads to improved code parameters. Moreover, a decoding algorithm is proposed that exploits the recursive structure of the concatenation. This algorithm enables efficient soft-input decoding of binary block codes with small to medium lengths. The proposed codes and their decoding achieve significant performance gains compared with RM codes and recursive GMC decoding.