Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)

The Dirty Paper Wiretap Feedback Channel with or without Action on the State

Bin Dai, Chong Li, Yingbin Liang, Zheng Ma, Shlomo Shitz Shamai

Published Jul 1, 2019• 3 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The dirty paper wiretap channel, also referred to as the Gaussian wiretap channel with noncausal state at the transmitter, is revisited. First, we determine the secrecy capacity of the dirty paper wiretap channel with noiseless feedback, where the feedback channel is from the legitimate receiver to the transmitter. Next, we obtain lower and upper bounds on the secrecy capacity of the action-dependent dirty paper wiretap channel with noiseless feedback, and show that these bounds meet for a special case. Unlike the fact that action on the state helps to enhance the capacity of the dirty paper channel with feedback, numerical results of this paper indicate that it may not help to enhance the secrecy capacity of the dirty paper wiretap channel with feedback.

DOI
10.1109/isit.2019.8849443

Related papers

Capacity Results on the Action-Dependent Dirty Paper Wiretap Channel

Bin Dai, Haonan Zhang, Zheng Ma

The dirty paper wiretap channel, also referred to as the Gaussian wiretap channel with noncausal channel state at the transmitter, plays an important role in wireless physical layer security. In this paper, the dirty paper wiretap channel is revisited by considering actions on the channel state, i.e., the transmitter generates an action sequence that affects the formation of the channel state. Lower and upper bounds on the secrecy capacity of this model are proposed, and numerical results indicate that the actions on the state help to increase the achievable secrecy rate of the dirty paper wiretap channel. The study of this paper offers a new option for enhancing the secrecy rates of the state-dependent wiretap channel models.

IEEE International Conference on Communications workshops•May 1, 2019•0 citations

Impact of Action-Dependent State and Channel Feedback on Gaussian Wiretap Channels

Bin Dai, Chong Li, Yingbin Liang +2 more

We investigate the state-dependent Gaussian wiretap channel with noncausal channel state information at the transmitter (GWTC-N-CSIT), and explore whether three strategies (i.e., taking action on the state, legitimate receiver's channel output feedback, and combining the former two strategies together) help to enhance the secrecy capacity of the GWTC-N-CSIT. To be specific, we first determine the secrecy capacity of the GWTC-N-CSIT with noiseless feedback. Next, we derive lower and upper bounds on the secrecy capacity of the GWTC-N-CSIT with action-dependent state. Finally, we derive lower and upper bounds on the secrecy capacity of the GWTC-N-CSIT with both action-dependent state and noiseless feedback, and show that these bounds meet for a special case. Numerical results of this paper indicate that all three strategies enhance the secrecy capacity of the GWTC-N-CSIT. The study of this paper offers new options for enhancing the secrecy rates of the state-dependent wiretap channel models.

IEEE Transactions on Information Theory•Jan 21, 2020•27 citations

Two Lower Bounds on the Secrecy Capacity of the Action-dependent Dirty Paper Wiretap Channel

Linman Yu, Zhuojun Zhuang, Zheng Ma +1 more

In this paper, we study the state-dependent Gaussian wiretap channel with action encoder and noncausal state at the transmitter, which is also called the action-dependent dirty paper wiretap channel. Two lower bounds on the secrecy capacity of this model are provided, and we find that the two bounds have their advantages and disadvantages, i.e., none of the two always performs better than the other. In addition, we find that taking action on the state helps to increase the achievable secrecy rate of the dirty paper wiretap channel.

International Workshop on Signal Design and its Applications in Communications•Oct 1, 2019•0 citations

New Result on the Feedback Capacity of the Action-Dependent Dirty Paper Wiretap Channel

Guangfen Xie, Bin Dai

The Gaussian wiretap channel with noncausal state interference available at the transmitter, which is also called the dirty paper wiretap channel (DP-WTC), has been extensively studied in the literature. Recently, it has been shown that taking actions on the corrupted state interference of the DP-WTC (also called the action-dependent DP-WTC) helps to increase the secrecy capacity of the DP-WTC. Subsequently, it has been shown that channel feedback further increases the secrecy capacity of the action-dependent DP-WTC (AD-DP-WTC), and a sub-optimal feedback scheme is proposed for this feedback model. In this paper, a two-step hybrid scheme and a corresponding new lower bound on the secrecy capacity of the AD-DP-WTC with noiseless feedback are proposed. The proposed new lower bound is shown to be optimal (achieving the secrecy capacity) and tighter than the existing one in the literature for some cases, and the results of this paper are further explained via numerical examples.

Entropy•Jul 21, 2021•0 citations

Feedback Schemes for the Action-Dependent Wiretap Channel with Noncausal State at the Transmitter

Haonan Zhang, Linman Yu, Bin Dai

In this paper, we propose two feedback coding schemes for the action-dependent wiretap channel with noncausal state at the transmitter. The first scheme follows from the already existing secret key based feedback coding scheme for the wiretap channel. The second one follows from our recently proposed hybrid feedback scheme for the wiretap channel. We show that, for the action-dependent wiretap channel with noncausal state at the transmitter, the second feedback scheme performs better than the first one, and the capacity results of this paper are further explained via a Gaussian example, which we call the action-dependent dirty paper wiretap channel with noiseless feedback.

Entropy•Mar 13, 2019•4 citations

Feeding Back the Output or Sharing the State: Which Is Better for the State-Dependent Wiretap Channel?

Bin Dai, Zheng Ma, Linman Yu

In this paper, the general wiretap channel with channel state information (CSI) at the transmitter and noiseless feedback is investigated, where the feedback is from the legitimate receiver to the transmitter, and the CSI is available at the transmitter in a causal or noncausal manner. The capacity-equivocation regions are determined for this model in both causal and noncausal cases, and the results are further explained via Gaussian and binary examples. For the Gaussian model, we find that in some particular cases, the noiseless feedback performs better than Chia and El Gamal’s CSI sharing scheme, i.e., the secrecy capacity of this feedback scheme is larger than that of the CSI sharing scheme. For the degraded binary model, we find that the noiseless feedback performs no better than Chia and El Gamal’s CSI sharing scheme. However, if the cross-over probability of the wiretap channel is large enough, we show that the two schemes perform the same.

Entropy•Nov 30, 2015•3 citations
The dirty paper wiretap channel, also referred to as the Gaussian wiretap channel with noncausal state at the transmitter, is revisited. First, we determine the secrecy capacity of the dirty paper wiretap channel with noiseless feedback, where the feedback channel is from the legitimate receiver to the transmitter. Next, we obtain lower and upper bounds on the secrecy capacity of the action-dependent dirty paper wiretap channel with noiseless feedback, and show that these bounds meet for a special case. Unlike the fact that action on the state helps to enhance the capacity of the dirty paper channel with feedback, numerical results of this paper indicate that it may not help to enhance the secrecy capacity of the dirty paper wiretap channel with feedback.
The dirty paper wiretap channel, also referred to as the Gaussian wiretap channel with noncausal channel state at the transmitter, plays an important role in wireless physical layer security. In this paper, the dirty paper wiretap channel is revisited by considering actions on the channel state, i.e., the transmitter generates an action sequence that affects the formation of the channel state. Lower and upper bounds on the secrecy capacity of this model are proposed, and numerical results indicate that the actions on the state help to increase the achievable secrecy rate of the dirty paper wiretap channel. The study of this paper offers a new option for enhancing the secrecy rates of the state-dependent wiretap channel models.
We investigate the state-dependent Gaussian wiretap channel with noncausal channel state information at the transmitter (GWTC-N-CSIT), and explore whether three strategies (i.e., taking action on the state, legitimate receiver's channel output feedback, and combining the former two strategies together) help to enhance the secrecy capacity of the GWTC-N-CSIT. To be specific, we first determine the secrecy capacity of the GWTC-N-CSIT with noiseless feedback. Next, we derive lower and upper bounds on the secrecy capacity of the GWTC-N-CSIT with action-dependent state. Finally, we derive lower and upper bounds on the secrecy capacity of the GWTC-N-CSIT with both action-dependent state and noiseless feedback, and show that these bounds meet for a special case. Numerical results of this paper indicate that all three strategies enhance the secrecy capacity of the GWTC-N-CSIT. The study of this paper offers new options for enhancing the secrecy rates of the state-dependent wiretap channel models.
In this paper, we study the state-dependent Gaussian wiretap channel with action encoder and noncausal state at the transmitter, which is also called the action-dependent dirty paper wiretap channel. Two lower bounds on the secrecy capacity of this model are provided, and we find that the two bounds have their advantages and disadvantages, i.e., none of the two always performs better than the other. In addition, we find that taking action on the state helps to increase the achievable secrecy rate of the dirty paper wiretap channel.
The Gaussian wiretap channel with noncausal state interference available at the transmitter, which is also called the dirty paper wiretap channel (DP-WTC), has been extensively studied in the literature. Recently, it has been shown that taking actions on the corrupted state interference of the DP-WTC (also called the action-dependent DP-WTC) helps to increase the secrecy capacity of the DP-WTC. Subsequently, it has been shown that channel feedback further increases the secrecy capacity of the action-dependent DP-WTC (AD-DP-WTC), and a sub-optimal feedback scheme is proposed for this feedback model. In this paper, a two-step hybrid scheme and a corresponding new lower bound on the secrecy capacity of the AD-DP-WTC with noiseless feedback are proposed. The proposed new lower bound is shown to be optimal (achieving the secrecy capacity) and tighter than the existing one in the literature for some cases, and the results of this paper are further explained via numerical examples.
In this paper, we propose two feedback coding schemes for the action-dependent wiretap channel with noncausal state at the transmitter. The first scheme follows from the already existing secret key based feedback coding scheme for the wiretap channel. The second one follows from our recently proposed hybrid feedback scheme for the wiretap channel. We show that, for the action-dependent wiretap channel with noncausal state at the transmitter, the second feedback scheme performs better than the first one, and the capacity results of this paper are further explained via a Gaussian example, which we call the action-dependent dirty paper wiretap channel with noiseless feedback.
In this paper, the general wiretap channel with channel state information (CSI) at the transmitter and noiseless feedback is investigated, where the feedback is from the legitimate receiver to the transmitter, and the CSI is available at the transmitter in a causal or noncausal manner. The capacity-equivocation regions are determined for this model in both causal and noncausal cases, and the results are further explained via Gaussian and binary examples. For the Gaussian model, we find that in some particular cases, the noiseless feedback performs better than Chia and El Gamal’s CSI sharing scheme, i.e., the secrecy capacity of this feedback scheme is larger than that of the CSI sharing scheme. For the degraded binary model, we find that the noiseless feedback performs no better than Chia and El Gamal’s CSI sharing scheme. However, if the cross-over probability of the wiretap channel is large enough, we show that the two schemes perform the same.