Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Cambridge University Press eBooks

The Modal-Hamiltonian Interpretation: Measurement, Invariance, and Ontology

Olímpia Lombardi

Published Apr 11, 2019• 7 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1017/9781108562218.004

Related papers

A modal-Hamiltonian interpretation of quantum mechanics

Olímpia Lombardi, Mario Castagnino

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics•Apr 30, 2008•109 citations

The modal-Hamiltonian interpretation and the Galilean covariance of quantum mechanics

Olímpia Lombardi, Mario Castagnino, Juan Sebastián Ardenghi

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics•Apr 21, 2010•53 citations

Modal interpretations, decoherence and measurements

Guido Bacciagaluppi, Meir Hemmo

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics•Sep 1, 1996•99 citations

How Different Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics can Enrich Each Other: The Case of the Relational Quantum Mechanics and the Modal-Hamiltonian Interpretation

Olímpia Lombardi, Juan Sebastián Ardenghi

Foundations of Physics•Jun 1, 2022•21 citations

A modal-Hamiltonian interpretation of quantum mechanics

Olímpia Lombardi, Mario Castagnino

The aim of this paper is to introduce a new member of the family of the modal interpretations of quantum mechanics. In this modal-Hamiltonian interpretation, the Hamiltonian of the quantum system plays a decisive role in the property-ascription rule that selects the definite-valued observables whose possible values become actual. We show that this interpretation is effective for solving the measurement problem, both in its ideal and its non-ideal versions, and we argue for the physical relevance of the property-ascription rule by applying it to well-known physical situations. Moreover, we explain how this interpretation supplies a description of the elemental categories of the ontology referred to by the theory, where quantum systems turn out to be bundles of possible properties.

arXiv:quant-ph/0610121•Oct 15, 2006•1 citation

Quantum modal indeterminacy

Claudio Calosi

The paper investigates the existence and the nature of quantum indeterminacy in a particular realist interpretation of quantum mechanics, that is, the Modal Hamiltonian Interpretation (MHI)-together with an ontology of properties for quantum systems. In doing so, it serves a twofold purpose. First, it advances the debate on quantum ontology by showing precisely how and why indeterminacy arises in a quantum world-as described by the MHI. Second, it offers a naturalistic example of genuine metaphysical indeterminacy, an example coming from our best physics.

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A•Sep 6, 2022•25 citations
The aim of this paper is to introduce a new member of the family of the modal interpretations of quantum mechanics. In this modal-Hamiltonian interpretation, the Hamiltonian of the quantum system plays a decisive role in the property-ascription rule that selects the definite-valued observables whose possible values become actual. We show that this interpretation is effective for solving the measurement problem, both in its ideal and its non-ideal versions, and we argue for the physical relevance of the property-ascription rule by applying it to well-known physical situations. Moreover, we explain how this interpretation supplies a description of the elemental categories of the ontology referred to by the theory, where quantum systems turn out to be bundles of possible properties.
The paper investigates the existence and the nature of quantum indeterminacy in a particular realist interpretation of quantum mechanics, that is, the Modal Hamiltonian Interpretation (MHI)-together with an ontology of properties for quantum systems. In doing so, it serves a twofold purpose. First, it advances the debate on quantum ontology by showing precisely how and why indeterminacy arises in a quantum world-as described by the MHI. Second, it offers a naturalistic example of genuine metaphysical indeterminacy, an example coming from our best physics.