The laser linewidth manifests the spectral coherence of a lasing resonator mode. It is of fundamental importance, theoretically as much as practically. For more than half a century we have been told that the laser linewidth is a result of quantum fluctuations due to spontaneous emission, which induce amplitude and phase fluctuations, whereas stimulated emission occurs in phase with the incident field. Unfortunately, in such a scenario each emission process would violate the law of energy conservation. We show that a (spontaneous or stimulated) emission process occurs 90 degrees in lead of the incident field, converts one atomic excitation into one photon in the lasing mode and, therefore, conserves the energy, whereas the mentioned fluctuations are the result of vacuum energy and occur at an orders-of-magnitude faster time scale than an emission process.
The laser linewidth manifests the spectral coherence of a lasing resonator mode. It is of fundamental importance, theoretically as much as practically. For more than half a century we have been told that the laser linewidth is a result of quantum fluctuations due to spontaneous emission, which induce amplitude and phase fluctuations, whereas stimulated emission occurs in phase with the incident field. Unfortunately, in such a scenario each emission process would violate the law of energy conservation. We show that a (spontaneous or stimulated) emission process occurs 90 degrees in lead of the incident field, converts one atomic excitation into one photon in the lasing mode and, therefore, conserves the energy, whereas the mentioned fluctuations are the result of vacuum energy and occur at an orders-of-magnitude faster time scale than an emission process.
In the literature one finds several conflicting accounts of the phase difference of stimulated and spontaneous emission, as well as absorption, with respect to an existing (triggering) electromagnetic field. One of these approaches proposes that stimulated emission and absorption occur in phase and out of phase with their driving field, respectively, whereas spontaneous emission occurs under an arbitrary phase difference with respect to an existing field. It has served as a basis for explaining quantum-mechanically the laser linewidth, its narrowing by a factor of 2 around the laser threshold, as well as its broadening due to amplitude-phase coupling, resulting in Henry’s α-factor. Assuming the validity of Maxwell’s equations, all three processes would, thus, violate the law of energy conservation. In semi-classical approaches, we investigate stimulated emission in a Fabry-Pérot resonator, analyze the Lorentz oscillator model, apply the Kramers-Kronig relations to the complex susceptibility, understand the summation of quantized electric fields, and quantitatively interpret emission and absorption in the amplitude-phase diagram. In all cases, we derive that the phase of stimulated emission is 90o in lead of the driving field, and the phase of absorption lags 90o behind the transmitted field. Also spontaneous emission must obey energy conservation, hence it occurs with 90o phase in lead of an existing field. These semi-classical findings agree with recent experimental investigations regarding the interaction of attosecond pulses with an atom, thereby questioning the physical explanation of the laser linewidth and its narrowing or broadening.
The processes of absorption and stimulated emission are investigated via (i) energy conservation in a Fabry-Perot resonator, (ii) the Lorentz-oscillator model, and (iii) the Kramers-Kronig relations. Vacuum fluctuations are added and the relation between stimulated and spontaneous emission is clarified. It is shown that previous models start from incorrect assumptions about the physical foundations of spontaneous emission. The non-orthogonality of longitudinal optical modes in a linear resonator is investigated and its consequences for the laser linewidth are discussed. Based on these results, a semi-classical approach to the laser linewidth below, around, and above the laser threshold which is consistent with resonator theory is presented. These results also shed new light on the usually considered linewidth-narrowing and -broadening factors.
We review the physics underlying the process of spontaneous emission, with a special focus on spontaneous emission into a resonator mode. We define the mode volume, verify the fundamental modal dimensions, present the spectral mode profile, the coherence time, the Q-factor, the Füchtbauer-Ladenburg equation, and the Purcell factor, and discuss their influence on different types of lasers. We obtain the relation between peak emission cross section, radiative lifetime, and emission linewidth. By interpreting spontaneous emission as stimulated emission driven by vacuum fluctuations, we derive the spontaneous-emission rate into a resonator mode and establish physical expressions for the fractions of spontaneous emission and total decay from the upper laser level into this mode. Furthermore, we discuss coupling of the atomic system with the coherent field inside a lasing resonator mode, resulting in the formation of a Mollow triplet, and demonstrate that it leads to a reduction of the spontaneous-emission rate by a factor of 2.
In the literature one finds several conflicting accounts of the phase difference of stimulated and spontaneous emission, as well as absorption, with respect to an existing (triggering) electromagnetic field. One of these approaches proposes that stimulated emission and absorption occur in phase and out of phase with their driving field, respectively, whereas spontaneous emission occurs under an arbitrary phase difference with respect to an existing field. It has served as a basis for explaining quantum-mechanically the laser linewidth, its narrowing by a factor of 2 around the laser threshold, as well as its broadening due to amplitude–phase coupling, resulting in Henry’s α-factor. Assuming the validity of Maxwell’s equations, all three processes would, thus, violate the law of energy conservation. In semi-classical approaches, we investigate stimulated emission in a Fabry–Perot resonator, analyze the Lorentz oscillator model, apply the Kramers–Kronig relations to the complex susceptibility, understand the summation of quantized electric fields, and quantitatively interpret emission and absorption in the amplitude–phase diagram. In all cases, we derive that the phase of stimulated emission is 90° in lead of the driving field, and the phase of absorption lags 90° behind the transmitted field. Also spontaneous emission must obey energy conservation, hence it occurs with 90° phase in lead of an existing field. These semi-classical findings agree with recent experimental investigations regarding the interaction of attosecond pulses with an atom, thereby questioning the physical explanation of the laser linewidth and its narrowing or broadening.
As discussed in the last three chapters, the fundamental source of noise in a laser is spontaneous emission. A simple pictorial model for the origin of the laser linewidth envisions it as being due to the random phase diffusion process arising from the addition of spontaneously emitted photons with random phases to the laser field. In this chapter we show that the quantum noise leading to the laser linewidth can be suppressed below the standard, i.e., Schawlow–Townes limit by preparing the atomic systems in a coherent superposition of states as in the Hanle effect and quantum beat experiments discussed in Chapter 7. In such coherently prepared atoms the spontaneous emission is said to be correlated. Lasers operating via such a phase coherent atomic ensemble are known as correlated spontaneous emission lasers (CEL). An interesting aspect of the CEL is that it is possible to eliminate the spontaneous emission quantum noise in the relative linewidths by correlating the two spontaneous emission noise events. A number of schemes exist in which quantum noise quenching below the standard limit can be achieved. In two-mode schemes a correlation between the spontaneous emisson events in two different modes of the radiation field is established via atomic coherence so that the relative phase between them does not diffuse or fluctuate. In a Hanle laser and a quantum beat laser this is achieved by pumping the atoms coherently such that every spontaneously emitting atom contributes equally to the two modes of the radiation, leading to a reduction and even vanishing of the noise in the phase difference.
The earliest studies on the subject of spontaneous emission from an excited atom via interaction with the vacuum modes of the radiation field go back to the early days of quantum mechanics. In view of the fundamental nature of the vacuum fluctuations, it was long thought that spontaneous emission could not be controlled. However, in 1946 Purcell noted that the spontaneous emission rate of the atom inside a resonant cavity can be substantially enhanced (or suppressed) over its free-space value. This is due to the dramatic change of the density of modes of the vacuum field in a cavity. The enhancement and suppression of spontaneous emission in resonant and off-resonant cavities were observed experimentally in the 1980s. It was also realized in the 1950s and 1960s that coherent driving fields can dramatically change the characteristics of the spontaneous emission. The Autler-Townes doublet and Mollow three-peak spectrum are the examples of such behavior. A dramatic narrowing of the spectral peaks were discovered in driven multilevel atomic systems in the early 1990s. The role of atomic coherence in quenching spontaneous emission fluctuations in the context of laser physics was studied in the 1980s, via the correlated spontaneous emission laser (CEL). In this case atomic coherence results in the correlation of two spontaneous emission noise events so that the spontaneous emission quantum noise is eliminated in the relative linewidth. Later, it was “discovered” that the spontaneous emission can be suppressed through quantum interference between decay channels. Properly stated, this was rediscovered since it was first discovered and explained by Lamb in the 1940s. If the dipoles of two transitions from one upper level to two lower levels are parallel, the spontaneous emission in an ordinary vacuum can be cancelled. In a nonuniform vacuum, e.g., a cavity, the quenching of spontaneous emission can be achieved, even for the orthogonal dipoles.