Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

First Encounter with Bell Nonlocality

Valerio Scarani

Published Aug 7, 2019• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract This chapter is a self-contained introduction to Bell nonlocality. After a very quick historical motivation, the setting and the definition of nonlocality are given. Five classic examples of Bell tests are then introduced, including the CHSH and the GHZ tests. The remainder of the chapter is a critical reflection that contains two topics: a discussion of possible loopholes that should be avoided, and an elementary presentation of the main interpretations given to the phenomenon of nonlocality.

DOI
10.1093/oso/9780198788416.003.0001

Related papers

Bell Nonlocality

Valerio Scarani

Abstract Nonlocality was discovered by John Bell in 1964, in the context of the debates about quantum theory, but is a phenomenon that can be studied in its own right. Its observation proves that measurements are not revealing pre-determined values, falsifying the idea of “local hidden variables” suggested by Einstein and others. One is then forced to make some radical choice: either nature is intrinsically statistical and individual events are unspeakable, or our familiar space-time cannot be the setting for the whole of physics. As phenomena, nonlocality and its consequences will have to be predicted by any future theory, and may possibly play the role of foundational principles in these developments. But nonlocality has found a role in applied physics too: it can be used for “device-independent” certification of the correct functioning of random number generators and other devices. After a self-contained introduction to the topic, this monograph on nonlocality presents the main tools and results following a logical, rather than a chronological, order.

•Aug 7, 2019•604 citations

Bell Nonlocality

Valerio Scarani

Nonlocality was discovered by John Bell in 1964, in the context of the debates about quantum theory, but is a phenomenon that can be studied in its own right. Its observation proves that measurements are not revealing pre-determined values, falsifying the idea of “local hidden variables” suggested by Einstein and others. One is then forced to make some radical choice: either nature is intrinsically statistical and individual events are unspeakable, or our familiar space-time cannot be the setting for the whole of physics. As phenomena, nonlocality and its consequences will have to be predicted by any future theory, and may possibly play the role of foundational principles in these developments. But nonlocality has found a role in applied physics too: it can be used for “device-independent” certification of the correct functioning of random number generators and other devices. After a self-contained introduction to the topic, this monograph on nonlocality presents the main tools and results following a logical, rather than a chronological, order.

•Jan 1, 2019•0 citations

Multipartite Bell Nonlocality

Valerio Scarani

Abstract This chapter discusses nonlocality for scenarios with more than two players. The definition of locality is the obvious generalisation of the bipartite case, but now there are many more ways in which locality can be violated. First, the main families of inequalities are presented. Then, the definition and demonstration of genuine multipartite nonlocality is discussed.

•Aug 7, 2019•0 citations

Formalizing Bell Nonlocality

Valerio Scarani

Abstract This chapter covers the essential mathematical tools for the study of nonlocality. It begins with the main object under study: a collection of several probability distributions usually called “behavior”. The crucial definition of locality is then given, followed by Fine’s theorem that relates local behaviors to pre-existing values and clarifies the role of local deterministic processes. In turn, one finds that local behaviors belong to a polytope, whose facets are Bell inequalities. The simplest scenario, called CHSH, is studied in detail.

•Aug 7, 2019•1 citation

Mathematically Proving Bell Nonlocality Motivated by the GHZ Argument

Qiaowei Zhang, Zhihua Guo, Huaixin Cao

Bell nonlocality of quantum states is an important resource in quantum information and then has various applications. It is usually detected by the violation of some Bell’s inequalities and the all-versus-nothing test. In the present paper, we aim to establish some mathematical methods for proving Bell nonlocality without inequalities, inspired by the work [Phys. Rev. Lett., 89, 080402 (2002)] regarding the GHZ paradox. For self-containedness, we recall the mathematical definition of Bell nonlocality proposed in [Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron. 62, 030311 (2019)] and then give some basic properties on it. Then we derive some necessary conditions for a multipartite state to be Bell local and obtain some sufficient conditions for a state to be Bell nonlocal in terms of “expectations” of local observables without invoking Bell inequalities. Unlike the standard approach to nonlocality detection based on violation of Bell inequalities, the obtained criteria are formulated in terms of certain relations for expectation values of local observables that are constructed from the well-known GHZ paradoxes.

IEEE Access•Jan 1, 2021•4 citations

Bell Nonlocality in Quantum Theory

Valerio Scarani

Abstract All the examples of nonlocality that we know are accurately described within quantum theory. This chapter presents the study of CHSH and some systematic results. In particular, we learn that separable states can only give rise to local behaviors, while pure entangled states are nonlocal resources. The case of mixed entangled states is then introduced.

•Aug 7, 2019•0 citations
Abstract This chapter is a self-contained introduction to Bell nonlocality. After a very quick historical motivation, the setting and the definition of nonlocality are given. Five classic examples of Bell tests are then introduced, including the CHSH and the GHZ tests. The remainder of the chapter is a critical reflection that contains two topics: a discussion of possible loopholes that should be avoided, and an elementary presentation of the main interpretations given to the phenomenon of nonlocality.
Abstract Nonlocality was discovered by John Bell in 1964, in the context of the debates about quantum theory, but is a phenomenon that can be studied in its own right. Its observation proves that measurements are not revealing pre-determined values, falsifying the idea of “local hidden variables” suggested by Einstein and others. One is then forced to make some radical choice: either nature is intrinsically statistical and individual events are unspeakable, or our familiar space-time cannot be the setting for the whole of physics. As phenomena, nonlocality and its consequences will have to be predicted by any future theory, and may possibly play the role of foundational principles in these developments. But nonlocality has found a role in applied physics too: it can be used for “device-independent” certification of the correct functioning of random number generators and other devices. After a self-contained introduction to the topic, this monograph on nonlocality presents the main tools and results following a logical, rather than a chronological, order.
Nonlocality was discovered by John Bell in 1964, in the context of the debates about quantum theory, but is a phenomenon that can be studied in its own right. Its observation proves that measurements are not revealing pre-determined values, falsifying the idea of “local hidden variables” suggested by Einstein and others. One is then forced to make some radical choice: either nature is intrinsically statistical and individual events are unspeakable, or our familiar space-time cannot be the setting for the whole of physics. As phenomena, nonlocality and its consequences will have to be predicted by any future theory, and may possibly play the role of foundational principles in these developments. But nonlocality has found a role in applied physics too: it can be used for “device-independent” certification of the correct functioning of random number generators and other devices. After a self-contained introduction to the topic, this monograph on nonlocality presents the main tools and results following a logical, rather than a chronological, order.
Abstract This chapter covers the essential mathematical tools for the study of nonlocality. It begins with the main object under study: a collection of several probability distributions usually called “behavior”. The crucial definition of locality is then given, followed by Fine’s theorem that relates local behaviors to pre-existing values and clarifies the role of local deterministic processes. In turn, one finds that local behaviors belong to a polytope, whose facets are Bell inequalities. The simplest scenario, called CHSH, is studied in detail.
Bell nonlocality of quantum states is an important resource in quantum information and then has various applications. It is usually detected by the violation of some Bell’s inequalities and the all-versus-nothing test. In the present paper, we aim to establish some mathematical methods for proving Bell nonlocality without inequalities, inspired by the work [Phys. Rev. Lett., 89, 080402 (2002)] regarding the GHZ paradox. For self-containedness, we recall the mathematical definition of Bell nonlocality proposed in [Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron. 62, 030311 (2019)] and then give some basic properties on it. Then we derive some necessary conditions for a multipartite state to be Bell local and obtain some sufficient conditions for a state to be Bell nonlocal in terms of “expectations” of local observables without invoking Bell inequalities. Unlike the standard approach to nonlocality detection based on violation of Bell inequalities, the obtained criteria are formulated in terms of certain relations for expectation values of local observables that are constructed from the well-known GHZ paradoxes.