Abstract Subversion of cryptography has received wide attentions especially after the Snowden Revelations in 2013. Most of the currently proposed subversion attacks essentially rely on the freedom of randomness choosing in the cryptographic protocol to hide backdoors embedded in the cryptosystems. Despite the fact that significant progresses in this line of research have been made, most of them mainly considered the classical setting, while the research gap regarding subversion attacks against post-quantum cryptography remains tremendous. Inspired by this observation, we investigate a subversion attack against existing protocol that is proved post-quantum secure. Particularly, we show an efficient way to undetectably subvert the well-known lattice-based encryption scheme proposed by Regev (STOC 2005). Our subversion enables the subverted algorithm to stealthily leak arbitrary messages to the outsider who knows the backdoor. Through theoretical analysis and experimental observations, we demonstrate that the subversion attack against the LWE encryption scheme is feasible and practical.
Abstract Subversion of cryptography has received wide attentions especially after the Snowden Revelations in 2013. Most of the currently proposed subversion attacks essentially rely on the freedom of randomness choosing in the cryptographic protocol to hide backdoors embedded in the cryptosystems. Despite the fact that significant progresses in this line of research have been made, most of them mainly considered the classical setting, while the research gap regarding subversion attacks against post-quantum cryptography remains tremendous. Inspired by this observation, we investigate a subversion attack against existing protocol that is proved post-quantum secure. Particularly, we show an efficient way to undetectably subvert the well-known lattice-based encryption scheme proposed by Regev (STOC 2005). Our subversion enables the subverted algorithm to stealthily leak arbitrary messages to the outsider who knows the backdoor. Through theoretical analysis and experimental observations, we demonstrate that the subversion attack against the LWE encryption scheme is feasible and practical.
The swift advancement of quantum computing devices holds the potential to create robust machines that can tackle an extensive array of issues beyond the scope of conventional computers. Consequently, quantum computing machines create new risks at a velocity and scale never seen before, especially with regard to encryption. Lattice-based cryptography is regarded as post-quantum cryptography’s future and a competitor to a quantum computer attack. Thus, there are several advantages to lattice-based cryptographic protocols, including security, effectiveness, reduced energy usage and speed. In this work, we study the learning with errors (LWE) problem and the cryptosystems that are based on the LWE problem and, in addition, we present a new efficient variant of LWE cryptographic scheme.
Encryption and signature schemes based on worst-case lattice problems are promising candidates for the post-quantum era, where classic number-theoretic assumptions are rendered false. Although there have been many important results and breakthroughs in lattice cryptography, the questions of how to systematically evaluate their security in practice and how to choose secure parameters are still open. This is mainly due to the fact that most security proofs are essentially asymptotic statements. In addition, the hardness of the underlying complexity assumption is controlled by several interdependent parameters rather than just a simple bit length as in many classic schemes. With our work, we close this gap by providing a framework that (1) distills a hardness estimate out of a given parameter set and (2) relates the complexity of practical lattice-based attacks to symmetric “bit security” for the first time. Our approach takes various security levels, or attacker types, into account. Moreover, we use it to predict long-term security in a similar fashion as the results that are collected on www.keylength.com. In contrast to the experiments by Gama and Nguyen (Eurocrypt 2008), our estimates are based on precisely the family of lattices that is relevant in modern lattice-based cryptography. Our framework can be applied in two ways: Firstly, to assess the hardness of the (few) proposed parameter sets so far and secondly, to propose secure parameters in the first place. Our methodology is applicable to essentially all lattice-based schemes that are based on the learning with errors problem (LWE) or the small integer solution problem (SIS) and it allows us to compare efficiency and security across different schemes and even across different types of cryptographic primitives.
The landscape of modern cryptography is fundamentally challenged by the advent of quantum computing. Current public-key cryptosystems, which form the bedrock of secure digital communication, rely on the computational hardness of problems such as integer factorization (RSA) and the discrete logarithm problem (ECC). However, Shor's algorithm, if implemented on a sufficiently powerful quantum computer, can efficiently break these schemes, rendering them insecure. This paper explores the critical transition from these classical number theory problems to lattice-based cryptography, presenting a comprehensive analysis of the motivations, theoretical underpinnings, and practical implications for forging post-quantum cryptographic security. We delve into the mathematical foundations of lattice problems, such as the Shortest Vector Problem (SVP) and Learning With Errors (LWE), which are believed to resist known quantum algorithms. Through a thorough literature review, we trace the evolution of cryptographic thought, detailing the vulnerabilities of pre-quantum schemes and the emergence of lattice-based constructions as leading candidates for post-quantum standardization. The methodology outlines a comparative theoretical analysis of security, efficiency, and robustness against both classical and quantum attacks. Results demonstrate the compelling advantages of lattice-based schemes in terms of provable security reductions and resistance to quantum threats, albeit with considerations for increased key and ciphertext sizes. The discussion highlights the challenges and opportunities in the deployment and standardization of these new cryptographic primitives, emphasizing their critical role in securing future digital infrastructures. This work concludes that lattice-based cryptography offers a robust and theoretically sound pathway to establishing enduring security in a quantum-threatened world.
Current public key cryptosystems that are based on the hardness of integer factorization and discrete logarithm are insecure in the presence of large-scale quantum computers. Much effort has been devoted to replacing the quantum-insecure cryptosystems with newly developed "post-quantum" cryptosystem candidates, conjectured to be secure against quantum attack. Lattice-based cryptography has been widely recognized as a prominent candidate for practical post-quantum security.This dissertation improves the robustness and versatility of lattice-based cryptography through the following three contributions: 1. Chapter 3 introduces a constant-round protocol for unauthenticated group key exchange (i.e., with security against a passive eavesdropper). Group key exchange protocols allow a set of N parties to agree on a shared, secret key by communicating over a public network. Our protocol is based on the hardness of a lattice problem, which hence yields (plausible) post-quantum security. 2. In Chapter 4, we propose a framework for cryptanalysis of lattice-based schemes when certain types of information about the secret are leaked. Our framework generalizes the primal lattice reduction attack. The generalization allows for integrating the leaked information progressively before running a final lattice reduction step. Our framework can estimate the amount of security loss caused by the leaked information, and perform lattice reduction attacks with leaked information when computationally feasible. 3. Chapter 5 introduces an approach towards a ring analogue of the Leftover Hash Lemma (LHL). The LHL is a mathematical tool often used in the analysis of various lattice-based cryptosystems, as well as their leakage-resilient counterparts. However, it does not hold in the ring setting, which is typical for efficient cryptosystems. Lyubashevsky et al. (Eurocrypt '13) proved a "regularity lemma," which is used in the ring setting instead of the LHL; however, this applies only for centered, spherical Gaussian inputs, while the LHL applies when the input is drawn from any high min-entropy distribution. Our approach generalizes the "regularity lemma" of Lyubashevsky et al. to certain conditional distributions. A number of Ring-Learning with Errors based cryptosystems can achieve certain leakage resilience properties using our results.
Lattice-based cryptography seems to be a good area for the researchers in cryptology because of its vulnerability against quantum computing attacks. Such resources as extensive documentation, theoretical foundations, and practical implementations are provided with respect to some key algorithms, which are Learning With Errors (LWE) and Ring-LWE, and sophisticated ones such as homomorphic encryption. This paper aims to make academic research more practical by providing tools for cryptographers and programmers to experiment with lattice-based cryptography in secure communications and data protection. Thus, we examine and implement Lizard, Ring-Lizard, Kyber, Frodo, and NewHope in JavaScript, which are current postquantum cryptography possibilities due to their applicability and efficiency. In this case quantum computational capabilities are referred to as those that may compromise security thus undermining post-quantum cryptography.
The advent of large-scale quantum computers poses an existential threat to the security of current public-key cryptosystems, such as RSA and Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC), which rely on the computational intractability of integer factorization and discrete logarithms. This paper explores lattice-based cryptography as a promising candidate for post-quantum security. We delve into the mathematical foundations of lattices, specifically focusing on hard problems like the Shortest Vector Problem (SVP), Closest Vector Problem (CVP), Small Integer Solution (SIS), and Learning With Errors (LWE) problems, which are believed to remain intractable even for quantum computers. We provide a comprehensive review of prominent lattice-based constructions, including NTRU, Kyber, and Dilithium, highlighting their security proofs, efficiency considerations, and suitability for various cryptographic primitives such as public-key encryption, key-exchange mechanisms, and digital signatures. Furthermore, we discuss the challenges and opportunities associated with their deployment, including parameter selection, resistance to side-channel attacks, and integration into existing cryptographic infrastructures. By examining the theoretical underpinnings and practical implications, this work aims to solidify understanding of lattice-based methods as a robust and essential component of the cryptographic landscape in the quantum era, moving beyond the traditional RSA frontier.