We study the problem of counting the number of homomorphisms from an input graph G to a fixed (quantum) graph ̄{H} in any finite field of prime order ℤ_p. The subproblem with graph H was introduced by Faben and Jerrum [ToC'15] and its complexity is still uncharacterised despite active research, e.g. the very recent work of Focke, Goldberg, Roth, and Zivný [SODA'21]. Our contribution is threefold. First, we introduce the study of quantum graphs to the study of modular counting homomorphisms. We show that the complexity for a quantum graph ̄{H} collapses to the complexity criteria found at dimension 1: graphs. Second, in order to prove cases of intractability we establish a further reduction to the study of bipartite graphs. Lastly, we establish a dichotomy for all bipartite (K_{3,3}$1{e}, {domino})-free graphs by a thorough structural study incorporating both local and global arguments. This result subsumes all results on bipartite graphs known for all prime moduli and extends them significantly. Even for the subproblem with p = 2 this establishes new results.We study the problem of counting the number of homomorphisms from an input graph G to a fixed (quantum) graph ̄{H} in any finite field of prime order ℤ_p. The subproblem with graph H was introduced by Faben and Jerrum [ToC'15] and its complexity is still uncharacterised despite active research, e.g. the very recent work of Focke, Goldberg, Roth, and Zivný [SODA'21]. Our contribution is threefold. First, we introduce the study of quantum graphs to the study of modular counting homomorphisms. We show that the complexity for a quantum graph ̄{H} collapses to the complexity criteria found at dimension 1: graphs. Second, in order to prove cases of intractability we establish a further reduction to the study of bipartite graphs. Lastly, we establish a dichotomy for all bipartite (K_{3,3}$1{e}, {domino})-free graphs by a thorough structural study incorporating both local and global arguments. This result subsumes all results on bipartite graphs known for all prime moduli and extends them significantly. Even for the subproblem with p = 2 this establishes new results.

arXiv:2011.04827Leibniz international proceedings in informaticsNov 9, 20201 citation

Planar Graph Homomorphisms: A Dichotomy and a Barrier from Quantum Groups

Jin‐Yi Cai, Ashwin Maran, Ben Young

We study the complexity of counting (weighted) planar graph homomorphism problem $\tt{Pl\text{-}GH}(M)$ parametrized by an arbitrary symmetric non-negative real valued matrix $M$ . For matrices with pairwise distinct diagonal values, we prove a complete dichotomy theorem: $\tt{Pl\text{-}GH}(M)$ is either polynomial-time tractable, or $\#$ P-hard, according to a simple criterion. More generally, we obtain a dichotomy whenever every vertex pair of the graph represented by $M$ can be separated using some planar edge gadget. A key question in proving complexity dichotomies in the planar setting is the expressive power of planar edge gadgets. We build on the framework of Mančinska and Roberson to establish links between \textit{planar} edge gadgets and the theory of the \textit{quantum automorphism group} $\tt{Qut}(M)$ . We show that planar edge gadgets that can separate vertex pairs of $M$ exist precisely when $\tt{Qut}(M)$ is \emph{trivial}, and prove that the problem of whether $\tt{Qut}(M)$ is trivial is undecidable. These results delineate the frontier for planar homomorphism counting problems and uncover intrinsic barriers to extending nonplanar reduction techniques to the planar setting.We study the complexity of counting (weighted) planar graph homomorphism problem $\tt{Pl\text{-}GH}(M)$ parametrized by an arbitrary symmetric non-negative real valued matrix $M$. For matrices with pairwise distinct diagonal values, we prove a complete dichotomy theorem: $\tt{Pl\text{-}GH}(M)$ is either polynomial-time tractable, or $\#$P-hard, according to a simple criterion. More generally, we obtain a dichotomy whenever every vertex pair of the graph represented by $M$ can be separated using some planar edge gadget. A key question in proving complexity dichotomies in the planar setting is the expressive power of planar edge gadgets. We build on the framework of Mančinska and Roberson to establish links between \textit{planar} edge gadgets and the theory of the \textit{quantum automorphism group} $\tt{Qut}(M)$. We show that planar edge gadgets that can separate vertex pairs of $M$ exist precisely when $\tt{Qut}(M)$ is \emph{trivial}, and prove that the problem of whether $\tt{Qut}(M)$ is trivial is undecidable. These results delineate the frontier for planar homomorphism counting problems and uncover intrinsic barriers to extending nonplanar reduction techniques to the planar setting.

arXiv:2601.23198Jan 30, 20260 citations

Quantum Time Complexity and Algorithms for Pattern Matching on Labeled Graphs

Parisa Darbari, Daniel Gibney, Sharma V. Thankachan

Lecture notes in computer scienceJan 1, 20222 citations

We study the complexity of counting (weighted) planar graph homomorphism problem

\tt{Pl\text{-}GH}(M)

parametrized by an arbitrary symmetric non-negative real valued matrix

M

. For matrices with pairwise distinct diagonal values, we prove a complete dichotomy theorem:

\tt{Pl\text{-}GH}(M)

is either polynomial-time tractable, or

\#

P-hard, according to a simple criterion. More generally, we obtain a dichotomy whenever every vertex pair of the graph represented by

M

can be separated using some planar edge gadget. A key question in proving complexity dichotomies in the planar setting is the expressive power of planar edge gadgets. We build on the framework of Mančinska and Roberson to establish links between \textit{planar} edge gadgets and the theory of the \textit{quantum automorphism group}

\tt{Qut}(M)

. We show that planar edge gadgets that can separate vertex pairs of

M

exist precisely when

\tt{Qut}(M)

is \emph{trivial}, and prove that the problem of whether

\tt{Qut}(M)

is trivial is undecidable. These results delineate the frontier for planar homomorphism counting problems and uncover intrinsic barriers to extending nonplanar reduction techniques to the planar setting.