This chapter deals with the all-important notion of state as it is central to all parts of physics. For this book, most important are, on the one hand, the notions of state by Newton and Euler – on the other hand, the notion of state by Lagrange and Laplace used nowadays. Surprisingly enough, Newton and Euler’s notions of state are closer to quantum mechanics than the nowadays’ one. Newton’s axiomatic contains solely the conservation of states (1st and 3rd axioms) and the change of states (2nd axiom). In contrast, the equation of motion is not part of the axiomatic. Euler’s axiomatic contains solely the conservation of states. The change of state (and subsequently the equation of motion) is to be examined according to the problem under consideration. In contrast to Newton’s axiomatic and correcting Bohr’s corresponding claim, Euler’s principles of state change for classical bodies are formulated such, that they can be translated even to quantum-mechanical motion. Their power is also demonstrated through an alternative derivation of Hamilton’s equation of motion.
This chapter deals with the all-important notion of state as it is central to all parts of physics. For this book, most important are, on the one hand, the notions of state by Newton and Euler – on the other hand, the notion of state by Lagrange and Laplace used nowadays. Surprisingly enough, Newton and Euler’s notions of state are closer to quantum mechanics than the nowadays’ one. Newton’s axiomatic contains solely the conservation of states (1st and 3rd axioms) and the change of states (2nd axiom). In contrast, the equation of motion is not part of the axiomatic. Euler’s axiomatic contains solely the conservation of states. The change of state (and subsequently the equation of motion) is to be examined according to the problem under consideration. In contrast to Newton’s axiomatic and correcting Bohr’s corresponding claim, Euler’s principles of state change for classical bodies are formulated such, that they can be translated even to quantum-mechanical motion. Their power is also demonstrated through an alternative derivation of Hamilton’s equation of motion.
The time-independent Schrödinger equation represents a stationary-state equation. The stationary wave functions obtained so far are time independent. Their time-dependence is obtained by means of rather general arguments. Then, stationarystate functions are found. The next step in Newton’s and Euler’s representations of classical mechanics is (to derive) the equation of change of stationary-states. Here, Euler’s principles of stationary-state change are generalized to quantum-mechanical systems. This enables us to derive the quantum-mechanical equation of change of stationary-states. The time-independent Schrödinger equation, i.e, the equation of motion will follow in the next chapter.
A generalized Euler equation of fluid dynamics is derived for describing many-body states of quantum mechanics. The Eulerian Eq. can be viewed as representing the interaction of two substates, where each substate has its own velocity and pressure fields. These field quantities are given by maps of the wavefunction. For one-body systems, the Eulerian Eq. can model either a fluid or particle description of quantum states. The generalized Euler Eq. is shown to be the gradient of an equation representing the total-energy of the two substates, having two energy fields. This total-energy Eq. is a generalization of the Bernoulli Eq. of fluid dynamics. The total-energy Eq., along with a continuity-equation, is equivalent to the time-dependent Schroedinger Eq. An equation is also derived that is equivalent to the main equation of Bohmian mechanics with additional identifications: The quantum potential of Bohmian mechanics is given as a sum of a kinetic energy and pressure fields. Also, the time derivative of the wavefunction phase is replaced by an energy field. In the formalism, field quantities are identified from their placement in equations of classical mechanics and separately, by definitions that involve the wavefunction and operators of quantum mechanics. This approach yields, unintended, and unknown energy and pressure fields. These fields, however, are shown to satisfy a continuity Eq., an equation that is equivalent to the other equation of Bohmian mechanics. It is also demonstrated that energy conservation holds for both of these energy fields, if the wavefunction is a linear-combination of eigenvectors, where the eigenvectors can be nondegenerate. A detailed investigation is given on the possible behavior, or source, of an electron that has one of the velocity fields. Alternate formulae for this velocity fields are also considered.
Abstract A formalism of classical mechanics is given for time-dependent many-body states of quantum mechanics, describing both fluid flow and point mass trajectories. The familiar equations of energy, motion, and those of Lagrangian mechanics are obtained. An energy and continuity equation is demonstrated to be equivalent to the real and imaginary parts of the time dependent Schrödinger equation, respectively, where the Schrödinger equation is in density matrix form. For certain stationary states, using Lagrangian mechanics and a Hamiltonian function for quantum mechanics, equations for point-mass trajectories are obtained. For 1-body states and fluid flows, the energy equation and equations of motion are the Bernoulli and Euler equations of fluid mechanics, respectively. Generalizations of the energy and Euler equations are derived to obtain equations that are in the same form as they are in classical mechanics. The fluid flow type is compressible, inviscid, irrotational, with the nonclassical element of local variable mass. Over all space mass is conserved. The variable mass is a necessary condition for the fluid flow to agree with the zero orbital angular momentum for s states of hydrogen. Cross flows are examined, where velocity directions are changed without changing the kinetic energy. For one-electron atoms, the velocity modification gives closed orbits for trajectories, and mass conservation, vortexes, and density stratification for fluid flows. For many body states, under certain conditions, and by hypotheses, Euler equations of orbital-flows are obtained. One-body Schrödinger equations that are a generalization of the Hartree–Fock equations are also obtained. These equations contain a quantum Coulomb’s law, involving the 2-body pair function of reduced density matrix theory that replace the charge densities.
In this chapter we shall first summarize some conceptual and formal features of classical mechanics (Sec. 1.1). Modern physics started with the works of Galileo Galilei and Isaac Newton from which classical mechanics, one of the most beautiful and solid intellectual buildings of the human history, came out. The architecture of classical mechanics was developed between the end of the eighteenth century and the second half of the nineteenth century, and its present form is largely due to Lagrange, Jacobi, and Hamilton. As we shall see in this chapter, classical mechanics is built upon the requirement of determinism, a rather complex assumption which is far from being obvious. In Sec. 1.2 we shall present the two main conceptual features of quantum mechanics on the basis of an ideal interferometry experiment: the superposition principle and the principle of complementarity. In Sec. 1.3 a first formal treatment of quantum-mechanical states is developed: quantum states are represented by vectors in a space that turns out to be a Hilbert space. In Sec. 1.4 the significance of probability for quantum mechanics is explained briefly: we will show that probability is not just an ingredient of quantum mechanics, but is rather an intrinsic feature of the theory. Furthermore, we shall see that quantum probability is not ruled by Kolmogorov axioms of classical probability. Finally, we discuss the main evidences which have historically revealed the necessity of a departure from classical mechanics.
This chapter prepares a smooth way from Eulerian classical mechanics to quantum mechanics. Starting from Helmholtz’s foundation of the energy conservation law using Leibniz’s theorem as described in the foregoing Chapter 2, the configurations a system can (cannot) assume in a given stationary state are explored. The following constraints are taken into account: Newton-Euler’s exclusion principle, d’Alembertian constraints and constraints imposed by conservation laws. The set of possible and impossible momentum configurations is also considered, using Nemorarius’ theorem of the foregoing chapter.
I consider in this book a formulation of Quantum Mechanics. Usually QM is formulated based on the notion of time and space, both of which are thought a priori given quantities or notions. However, when we try to define the notion of velocity or momentum, we encounter a difficulty as we will see in chapter 1. The problem is that if the notion of time is given a priori, the velocity is definitely determined when given a position, which contradicts the uncertainty principle of Heisenberg. We then set the basis of QM on the notion of position and momentum operators as in chapter 2. Time of a local system then is defined approximately as a ratio ∣x∣/∣v∣ between the space coordinate x and the velocity v. In this formulation of QM, we can keep the uncertainty principle, and time is a quantity that does not have precise values unlike the usually supposed notion of time has. The feature of local time is that it is a time proper to each local system, which is defined as a finite set of quantum mechanical particles. We now have an infinite number of local times that are unique and proper to each local system. Based on the notion of local time, the motion inside a local system is described by the usual Schrodinger equation. We investigate such motion in a given local system in part II. This is a usual quantum mechanics. After some excursion of the investigation of local motion, we consider in part III the relative relation or motion between plural local systems. In the final part IV, we will prove that there is at least one Universe wave function ϕ in which all local systems have local motions and thus local times. This concludes our formulation of Quantum Mechanics.