Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Undergraduate texts in physics

Particle Interactions with EM Fields

K. Tamvakis

Published Jan 1, 2019• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-22777-7_17

Related papers

Particles in External Electromagnetic Fields

A. M. Perelomov

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1986•0 citations

The One-electron Quantum Hamiltonian in the Presence of EM Fields

Jochen Autschbach

Abstract The interaction between atoms or molecules and electromagnetic (EM) fields underlies all spectroscopic techniques and a great variety of desirable molecular properties. EM fields and EM waves are introduced via the famous Maxwell equations. The scalar and vector potential are defined, and the gauge freedom is outlined. The Coulomb gauge is adopted. The classical Hamiltonian for a charged particle in an EM field is derived, and from this the ‘minimal substitution’ rules for incorporating the fields in the quantum Hamiltonian are obtained. The operators describing the interaction of an electron with static electric and magnetic fields, including the magnetic fields from nuclear spins, are derived, followed by the derivation of the interaction between an electron and an EM wave.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Dec 21, 2020•0 citations

Quantum phases for electric charges and electric (magnetic) dipoles: physical meaning and implication

Alexander L. Kholmetskii, O. Missevitch, Tolga Yarman

We analyse the physical meaning of quantum phase effects for point-like charges and electric (magnetic) dipoles in an electromagnetic (EM) field. At present, there are known eight effects of such a kind: four of them (the magnetic and electric Aharonov – Bohm phases for electrons, the Aharonov – Casher phase for a moving magnetic dipole and the He – McKellar – Wilkens phase for a moving electric dipole) had been disclosed in 20th century, while four new quantum phases had recently been found by our team (A. L. Kholmetskii, O. V. Missevitch, T. Yarman). In our analysis of physical meaning of these phases, we adopt that a quantum phase for a dipole represents a superposition of quantum phases for each charge, composing the dipole. In this way, we demonstrate the failure of the Schrödinger equation for a charged particle in an EM field to describe new quantum phase effects, when the standard definition of the momentum operator is used. We further show that a consistent description of quantum phase effects for moving particles is achieved under appropriate re-definition of this operator, where the canonical momentum of particle in EM field is replaced by the interactional EM field momentum. Some implications of this result are discussed.

Journal of the Belarusian State University Physics•Feb 9, 2021•4 citations

HIGHER ORDER ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERACTIONS

Mitchel Weissbluth

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 1978•0 citations

Role of electromagnetic energy and momentum in the Aharonov–Bohm effect

Alexander L. Kholmetskii, O. Missevitch, Tolga Yarman

We analyse the physical meaning of the Aharonov–Bohm (AB) phase based on its representation through electromagnetic (EM) potentials as a sum of four components, which, in addition to the known electric and magnetic phase components, contains two more terms recently disclosed by our team in the analysis of quantum phase effects for dipoles and charges, and which we named the complementary electric AB phase and the complementary magnetic AB phase. Using the complete expression for the AB phase, we reveal that the phase component, explicitly depending on time, is determined by the interactional electric energy, while the phase component, explicitly depending on the velocity of charge, is determined by the interactional EM momentum for an isolated system ‘source of EM field and charge’. These findings shed new light on the origin of the AB phase and, in particular, allow us to generalize the de Broglie relationship and the Heisenberg uncertainty relations for a charged particle in an EM field.

Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences•Feb 1, 2024•4 citations

Electromagnetic Interaction

Jan-Markus Schwindt

Undergraduate lecture notes in physics•Oct 27, 2015•1 citation
Abstract The interaction between atoms or molecules and electromagnetic (EM) fields underlies all spectroscopic techniques and a great variety of desirable molecular properties. EM fields and EM waves are introduced via the famous Maxwell equations. The scalar and vector potential are defined, and the gauge freedom is outlined. The Coulomb gauge is adopted. The classical Hamiltonian for a charged particle in an EM field is derived, and from this the ‘minimal substitution’ rules for incorporating the fields in the quantum Hamiltonian are obtained. The operators describing the interaction of an electron with static electric and magnetic fields, including the magnetic fields from nuclear spins, are derived, followed by the derivation of the interaction between an electron and an EM wave.
We analyse the physical meaning of quantum phase effects for point-like charges and electric (magnetic) dipoles in an electromagnetic (EM) field. At present, there are known eight effects of such a kind: four of them (the magnetic and electric Aharonov – Bohm phases for electrons, the Aharonov – Casher phase for a moving magnetic dipole and the He – McKellar – Wilkens phase for a moving electric dipole) had been disclosed in 20th century, while four new quantum phases had recently been found by our team (A. L. Kholmetskii, O. V. Missevitch, T. Yarman). In our analysis of physical meaning of these phases, we adopt that a quantum phase for a dipole represents a superposition of quantum phases for each charge, composing the dipole. In this way, we demonstrate the failure of the Schrödinger equation for a charged particle in an EM field to describe new quantum phase effects, when the standard definition of the momentum operator is used. We further show that a consistent description of quantum phase effects for moving particles is achieved under appropriate re-definition of this operator, where the canonical momentum of particle in EM field is replaced by the interactional EM field momentum. Some implications of this result are discussed.
We analyse the physical meaning of the Aharonov–Bohm (AB) phase based on its representation through electromagnetic (EM) potentials as a sum of four components, which, in addition to the known electric and magnetic phase components, contains two more terms recently disclosed by our team in the analysis of quantum phase effects for dipoles and charges, and which we named the complementary electric AB phase and the complementary magnetic AB phase. Using the complete expression for the AB phase, we reveal that the phase component, explicitly depending on time, is determined by the interactional electric energy, while the phase component, explicitly depending on the velocity of charge, is determined by the interactional EM momentum for an isolated system ‘source of EM field and charge’. These findings shed new light on the origin of the AB phase and, in particular, allow us to generalize the de Broglie relationship and the Heisenberg uncertainty relations for a charged particle in an EM field.