Bell’s theorem is widely understood as demonstrating that quantum correlations cannot be explained by any theory of local hidden variables. The experimental violation of Bell inequalities has therefore often been interpreted as evidence for nonlocality or “spooky action at a distance.” This paper proposes a different geometric interpretation. It accepts Bell’s theorem as a decisive refutation of separable preassigned vector realism, but argues that entangled systems need not be modeled as pairs of particles carrying hidden local vector outcomes. Instead, the entangled state is interpreted as a nonseparable bivector coherence relation whose correlated vector outcomes are disclosed only through measurement. On this view, measurement is a basis-conditioned reduction from bivector structure to local vector registration. The standard singlet correlation E(a,b)=-a⋅b, including the Tsirelson bound S=2√2, is then interpreted as the scalar trace of a shared bivector relation rather than as the result of superluminal influence. The framework does not deny Bell’s theorem, Bell experiments, or quantum statistics. It instead reframes their ontological meaning: Bell violation marks the failure of separable vector completion, not the necessity of action at a distance. Keywords: Bell’s theorem; entanglement; bivectors; geometric algebra; spin; nonlocality; measurement; quantum foundations; Tsirelson bound; separable realism; relational ontology; UCCF. Explainer video Watch on YouTube (Roots of Reality): https://youtu.be/wfpY4QZ45ME The video, its thumbnail and description are included in this record.
We analyze foundational consequences of recently announced loophole free tests of violation of Bell's inequality. We consider two interpretations of these remarkable experiments. By the conventional one Einstein was wrong and Bohr was right, there is spooky action at a distance, quantum realism is incompatible with locality. However, we show that it is still possible to treat quantum mechanics without appealing to nonlocality or denying realism. We hope that this note will attract attention of the experts in quantum foundations and convince them to come with their own comments on the final Bell's test.
We analyze foundational consequences of recently reported loophole free tests of violation of Bell's inequality. We consider two interpretations of these remarkable experiments. The conventional one is “Einstein was wrong and Bohr was right, there is spooky action at a distance, quantum realism is incompatible with locality.” However, in line with discussions in literature during last decade, we show that it is still possible to treat quantum mechanics without appealing to nonlocality or denying realism. We hope that this note will call the attention of experts in quantum foundations and convince them that the case is not closed, so that they should come with their own comments on the status of the final Bell test.