This thesis consists of two parts. Although both are concerned with macroscopic quantum phenomena, I choose to present the two parts quite separately. Macroscopic Quantum Phenomena: Tests of Quantum Mechanics The correctness of quantum mechanics has been verified in numerous situations. A particularly strong test of quantum mechanics was suggested by Bell, who showed that the predictions of all classical theories, based as they are on the assumptions of local realism, contradict those of quantum mechanics. Later work by Greenberger, Horne, and Zeilinger showed that the GHZ phenomena also contradicts all classical theories. Experimental tests of Bells inequality performed to date support quantum mechanics (No experimental test of the GHZ phenomenon has yet been attempted). However, such tests have been so far restricted to microscopic systems in the sense that one particle is at a detector at a time. Our interest here in the first part of this thesis is in tests of quantum mechanics against local realistic theories in macroscopic or mesoscopic systems where there is a significant number of particles incident on each analyser. The states considered in the first two chapters are not simple quantum superpositions of macroscopically distinct states, but we nevertheless show how one can obtain tests of quantum mechanics in situations involving large numbers of particles. A more elementary macroscopic quantum state, and one in which the deviation from classical interpretations is striking, is the Schrodinger Cat state considered by Schrodinger in his famous "Schrodinger Cat" paradox. In Chapter Three we consider a scheme for generating such a state. The Quantum Brownian Motion Master Equation The second section of this thesis involves an examination of various aspects of the Quantum Brownian Motion Master Equation. We begin with a discussion of the recent problem occurring from the study of the quantum Brownian motion (QBM) master equation, which can occur because the QBM master equation is not of the Lindblad form. We examine two specific examples, namely the damped free particle and the two level atom. More specifically, in the case of the evolution of a free particle, we show that the equation of motion for the Wigner function (which is exactly the same as the Fokker-Planck equation for classical Brownian motion) gives unphysical results if the initial position distribution is well localised. In the case of the two level atom we show that unphysical results can also occur even in the steady state. The last chapter of the thesis involves using the quantum Brownian motion master equation to estimate the rate of diagonalisation of the off diagonal elements of a Fermion system. These elements contain the "quantum information" and hence knowledge of how long they exist can determine the type of model required to describe the semiconductor medium. Using a very simplistic approach we can show that there are two main time scales present and for normal parameters one of these is very small. If we neglect electron-electron scattering we can show that the the many electron system solution is simply a product of the one electron solutions.
This thesis consists of two parts. Although both are concerned with macroscopic quantum phenomena, I choose to present the two parts quite separately. Macroscopic Quantum Phenomena: Tests of Quantum Mechanics The correctness of quantum mechanics has been verified in numerous situations. A particularly strong test of quantum mechanics was suggested by Bell, who showed that the predictions of all classical theories, based as they are on the assumptions of local realism, contradict those of quantum mechanics. Later work by Greenberger, Horne, and Zeilinger showed that the GHZ phenomena also contradicts all classical theories. Experimental tests of Bells inequality performed to date support quantum mechanics (No experimental test of the GHZ phenomenon has yet been attempted). However, such tests have been so far restricted to microscopic systems in the sense that one particle is at a detector at a time. Our interest here in the first part of this thesis is in tests of quantum mechanics against local realistic theories in macroscopic or mesoscopic systems where there is a significant number of particles incident on each analyser. The states considered in the first two chapters are not simple quantum superpositions of macroscopically distinct states, but we nevertheless show how one can obtain tests of quantum mechanics in situations involving large numbers of particles. A more elementary macroscopic quantum state, and one in which the deviation from classical interpretations is striking, is the Schrodinger Cat state considered by Schrodinger in his famous "Schrodinger Cat" paradox. In Chapter Three we consider a scheme for generating such a state. The Quantum Brownian Motion Master Equation The second section of this thesis involves an examination of various aspects of the Quantum Brownian Motion Master Equation. We begin with a discussion of the recent problem occurring from the study of the quantum Brownian motion (QBM) master equation, which can occur because the QBM master equation is not of the Lindblad form. We examine two specific examples, namely the damped free particle and the two level atom. More specifically, in the case of the evolution of a free particle, we show that the equation of motion for the Wigner function (which is exactly the same as the Fokker-Planck equation for classical Brownian motion) gives unphysical results if the initial position distribution is well localised. In the case of the two level atom we show that unphysical results can also occur even in the steady state. The last chapter of the thesis involves using the quantum Brownian motion master equation to estimate the rate of diagonalisation of the off diagonal elements of a Fermion system. These elements contain the "quantum information" and hence knowledge of how long they exist can determine the type of model required to describe the semiconductor medium. Using a very simplistic approach we can show that there are two main time scales present and for normal parameters one of these is very small. If we neglect electron-electron scattering we can show that the the many electron system solution is simply a product of the one electron solutions.
While quantum theory has been tested to an incredible degree on microscopic scales, quantum effects are seldom observed in our everyday macroscopic world. The curious results of applying quantum mechanics to macroscopic objects are perhaps best illustrated by Erwin Schrödinger's famous thought experiment, where a cat can be put into a superposition state of being both dead and alive. Obviously, these quantum predictions are in stark contradiction to our common experience. Even with plenty of theoretical explanations put forward to explain this discrepancy, a large number of questions about the frontier between the quantum and the classical world remain unanswered. To distinguish between classical and quantum behavior, two fundamental concepts inherent to classical physics have been established over the years: The world view of local realism limits the power of classical experiments to establish correlations over space, while the world view of macroscopic realism (or macrorealism) restricts temporal correlations. Necessary conditions for both world views have been formulated in the form of Bell and Leggett-Garg inequalities, and Bell inequalities have been shown to be violated by quantum mechanics through increasingly conclusive experiments. Furthermore, many challenging steps towards convincing violations of macrorealism have been taken in a number of recent experiments. In the first part of this thesis, conditions for macrorealism are analyzed in detail. Two necessary conditions for macrorealism, the original Leggett-Garg inequality and the recently proposed no-signaling in time condition, are presented. It is then shown that a combination of no-signaling in time conditions is not only necessary but also sufficient for the existence of a macrorealistic description. Finally, an operational formulation of no-signaling in time, in terms of positive-operator valued measurements and Hamiltonians, is derived. In the next part, we argue that these results lead to a suitable definition of classical behavior. In particular, we provide a formalism to judge the classicality of measurements and time evolutions. We then proceed to apply it to a number of exemplary measurement operators and Hamiltonians. Finally, we argue for the importance of spontaneously realized Hamiltonians in our intuition of classical behavior. Next, differences between local realism and macrorealism are analyzed. For this purpose, the probability polytopes for spatially and temporally separated experiments are compared, and a fundamental difference in the power of quantum mechanics to build both types of correlations is discovered. This result shows that Fine's theorem, which states that a set of Bell inequalities is necessary and sufficient for local realism, is not transferable to macrorealism. Thus, (Leggett-Garg) inequalities are in principle not well-suited for tests of macrorealism, as they can never form a necessary and sufficient condition, and unnecessarily restrict the violating parameter space. No-signaling in time is both better suited and more strongly motivated from the underlying physical theory. In the final part of this thesis, a concrete experimental setup for implementing quantum experiments with macroscopic objects is proposed. It consists of a superconducting micro-sphere in the Meißner state, which is levitated by magnetic fields. Through its expelled magnetic field, the sphere's center-of-mass motion couples to a superconducting quantum circuit. Properly tuned, ground state cooling can be realized, since the sphere's motion is extremely well isolated from the surrounding environment. This setup therefore is a promising candidate for the observation of quantum effects in macroscopic systems.
In the Schrödinger-cat gedanken experiment a cat is in a quantum superposition of two macroscopically distinct states, alive and dead.The paradoxical interpretation of quantum mechanics is that the cat is not in one state or the other, alive or dead, immediately prior to its measurement. Because of this apparent defiance of macroscopic reality, quantum superpositions of states macroscopically distinct have generated much interest. Here we address the issue of proving a contradiction with macroscopic reality objectively, through the testable predictions of quantum mechanics. We consider the premises of macroscopic reality (that the ``cat'' is either ``dead'' or ``alive'', the measurement indicating which) and macroscopic locality (that simultaneous measurements some distance away cannot induce the macroscopic change, ``dead'' to ``alive'' and vice versa, to the ``cat''). The predictions of quantum mechanics for certain states, generated using states exhibiting continuous variable entanglement, are shown to be incompatible with the predictions of all theories based on this dual premise. Our proof is along the lines of Bell's theorem, but where all relevant measurements give macroscopically distinct results.
Since its very beginning, quantum mechanics has been developed to deal with systems on the atomic or sub-atomic scale. For many decades, there has been no reason to think about its application to macroscopic systems. Actually, macroscopic objects have even been used to show how bizarre quantum effects would appear if quantum mechanics were applied beyond its original realm. This is, for example, the essence of the so-called Schrödinger cat paradox (Schrödinger, 1935). How-ever, due to recent advances in the design of systems on the meso- and nanoscopic scales, as well as in cryogenic techniques, this situation has changed drastically. It is now quite natural to ask whether a specific quantum effect, collectively involving a macroscopic number of particles, could occur in these systems. In this book it is our intention to address the quantum mechanical effects that take place in properly chosen or built “macroscopic” systems. Starting from a very naïve point of view, we could always ask what happens to systems whose classical dynamics can be described by equations of motion equivalent to those of particles (or fields) in a given potential (or potential energy density). These can be represented by a generalized “coordinate” φ( r , t ) which could either describe a field variable or a “point particle” if it is not position dependent, φ( r , t ) = φ( t ).
Chapter 4 deals with Quantum Mechanical (QM) phenomena. The first section describes the first attempts at quantization of energy, momentum, angular momentum, etc. We start with Plank's solution to the black-body problem, introducing the concept of photons: discrete packets of electromagnetic energy. We show how Plank's description of black-body radiation is perfectly fit by the cosmic microwave radiation, providing the strongest evidence for the Big-Bang at the origin of the Universe. We then describe Bohr's solution to the paradoxical stability of atoms, introducing quantization of angular momentum (or action) and correctly predicting the energy levels of the hydrogen atom. We show how Einstein used Plank's idea to explain the photo-electric effect (an effect exploited in CCD cameras and solar cells) and how he used Bohr's understanding of energy levels in atoms to provide an intuitive explanation of Plank's law. Einstein insight opened the way to the field of spectroscopy and the development of the laser. In the second section, following the lead of Dirac, we show that QM is equivalent to Linear Algebra in the space of complex functions (which describe the state of the system). We show that Schrödinger's equation is a natural consequence of that description, once the relation between energy and frequency established by Plank (for photons) and de Broglie (for particles) is taken into account. In the context of the chiral ammonia molecule we discuss the queerness of QM which describes physical systems as superposition of states (such as left and right chirality state of a molecule, dead and alive cat). We show that this queerness is nonetheless supported by experiments and is behind much of our technology: masers and lasers, atomic clocks, semiconductors (diodes, transistors, etc.). In the following section we introduce the representation of operators in QM (the equivalent of matrices in linear algebra): momentum, position, energy, etc. which correspond to measurements on the system. We show that the non-commutability of some operators (common with matrix operations) leads to Heisenberg uncertainty principle: the position and momentum of a particle cannot be determined with absolute precision. We discuss the solution of Schrödinger's equation for free particles demonstrating their equivalence with EM phenomena: particles undergo refraction and diffraction, exemplifying the particle/wave duality inherent to QM systems. We discuss QM tunneling and its use in the Scanning Tunneling Microscope. In the following section we study Dirac's equation: the successful attempt by Dirac to unify QM with Einstein's relativity, with the resulting prediction of anti-particles and spin. We then solve for the energy levels of electrons in the hydrogen atom (from Schrödinger's equation) and show that the existence of spin profoundly affects the behavior of electrons in an atom: they cannot share the same energy level, a rule known as Pauli's exclusion principle. Pauli's principle is central to the understanding of the chemical properties of atoms and fully explains Mendeleev's periodic table of the elements. In the next section we discuss along with two exactly soluble systems (diatomic rotational and vibrational levels), various approximations used to study systems (e.g. molecules) for which there are no analytical solutions. In particular, we introduce Pauling's variational approach, Hückel molecular orbital theory and time independent perturbation theory. We apply those approaches to determine the energy levels in alkenes, in multi-electron atoms and in systems under constant electric or magnetic field (such as in Magnetic Resonance Imaging). In the last section we discuss time dependent perturbation theory. We use it to establish the rules allowing for transitions between energy levels and revisit Einstein description of absorption/emission phenomena.
The interaction of a quantum system with a many degree of freedom environment entails damping and the loss of quantum coherence. In these two lectures we focus on two aspects of open quantum system dynamics. First, we present decoherence as a dynamical phenomenon and determine the corresponding time scales, discuss an experiment and the nature of robust states, and mention universal properties of short-time decoherence of macroscopic superpositions. Secondly, in analogy to the classical description of open systems in terms of Langevin equations, we present a stochastic approach to open quantum system dynamics in terms of a stochastic Schrödinger equation. We give a microscopic derivation that allows us to generalize the stochastic approach to non-Markovian situations. We discuss a convolutionless formulation of our theory and finally, we focus on the quantised version of Brownian motion as an often-employed example.
The behavior of classical macroscopic particles – from baseballs to planets – is governed by Newtonian mechanics as we have described in the first chapters of this book. The behavior of very small particles, on the other hand, is governed by an entirely different collection of equations and rules that go under the name of “quantum mechanics” and these particles are referred to as quantum particles. These rules have analogies to classical mechanics, but are fundamentally different and somewhat mysterious as we discussed in Chapter 8. The fundamental principles of quantum mechanics cannot be proven to be correct. They were developed based on the results of experimental observation, by analogy with classical mechanics, and through the consideration of logical implications of the formalisms used. There is no way to derive the fundamental elements of quantum mechanics, any more than one could predict from first principles that Newtonian forces should add as vectors. On the other hand, quantum mechanics is among the most rigorously tested theories in science, and the predictions of quantum mechanics have, so far, always been in agreement with experiment. In this chapter, we will present quantum mechanics as a series of postulates and examine their implications in application to simple one-dimensional systems. In the next chapter we will examine quantum effects in real systems including atoms, molecules, crystals, and artificially engineered nano-structures. Postulates of quantum mechanics QM Postulate 1: A quantum particle is described by a wave function Ψ( x , y , z , t ) which is a function of spatial coordinates and time. All physically determinable quantities can be derived from the wave function Ψ( x , y , z , t ) ; quantities which cannot be found from the wave function are not physically meaningful. Note that some things that one could ask about a quantum particle, for example the exact position and simultaneous exact momentum of a particle, are not derivable from the wave function and are therefore considered indeterminate (or uncertain ). These are things which cannot ever be known about a particle, and, as such, they are meaningless to contemplate.