Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The Quantum Mechanics Conundrum: Interpretation and Foundations

Gennaro Auletta

Published Aug 17, 2019• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-16649-6

Related papers

The Quantum Mechanics Conundrum

Gennaro Auletta

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2019•5 citations

On Quantum Bayesianism

Moses Fayngold

The lately developed part of Quantum Bayesianism named QBism has been proclaimed by its authors a powerful interpretation of Quantum Physics. This article presents analysis of some aspects of QBism. The considered examples show inconsistencies in some basic statements of the discussed interpretation. In particular, the main quantum mechanical conundrum of measurement and the observer is, contrary to the claims, not resolved within the framework of QBism. The conclusion is made that the basic tenets of QBism as applied in Physics are unsubstantiated.

arXiv:2003.11022•Mar 24, 2020•0 citations

The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Roland L. Omnes

Princeton University Press eBooks•Jun 5, 2018•2 citations

Time as a Dynamical Variable

Z. Y. Wang, B. Chen, C. D. Xiong

There are enough reasons for us to consider time as a dynamical variable or operator; but according to Pauli's argument the existence of a self-adjoint time operator is incompatible with the semi-boundedness of Hamiltonian spectrum. In this article, we study the expressions of time operator and the definitions of mean time from a general and new viewpoint, make a new comment on Pauli's objections, and clarify some possible confusion in existing theories of time in quantum mechanics. From which we try to provide a new gateway for the conundrum of time in quantum mechanics and reconstruct a unified foundation for some issues of time.

arXiv:quant-ph/0311188•Nov 27, 2003•0 citations

Interpreting quantum mechanics

Michael E. Cuffaro

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 16, 2021•0 citations

Interpreting quantum mechanics

Michael Janas, Michael E. Cuffaro, Michel Janssen B

Boston studies in the philosophy of science•Dec 3, 2021•0 citations
The lately developed part of Quantum Bayesianism named QBism has been proclaimed by its authors a powerful interpretation of Quantum Physics. This article presents analysis of some aspects of QBism. The considered examples show inconsistencies in some basic statements of the discussed interpretation. In particular, the main quantum mechanical conundrum of measurement and the observer is, contrary to the claims, not resolved within the framework of QBism. The conclusion is made that the basic tenets of QBism as applied in Physics are unsubstantiated.
There are enough reasons for us to consider time as a dynamical variable or operator; but according to Pauli's argument the existence of a self-adjoint time operator is incompatible with the semi-boundedness of Hamiltonian spectrum. In this article, we study the expressions of time operator and the definitions of mean time from a general and new viewpoint, make a new comment on Pauli's objections, and clarify some possible confusion in existing theories of time in quantum mechanics. From which we try to provide a new gateway for the conundrum of time in quantum mechanics and reconstruct a unified foundation for some issues of time.