Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Leibniz international proceedings in informatics

Interferometric Versus Projective Measurement of Anyons

Claire Levaillant, Michael Hartley Freedman

Published Jan 1, 2015• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

Two distinct methods for measuring topological charge in a nonabelian anyonic system have been discussed in the literature: projective measurement of a single point-like quasiparticle and interferometric measurement of the total topological charge of a group of quasiparticles. Projective measurement by definition is only applied near a point and will project to a topological charge sector near that point. Thus, if it is to be applied to a group of anyons to project to a total charge, then the anyons must first be fused one by one to obtain a single anyon carrying the collective charge. We show that interferometric measurement is strictly stronger: Any protocol involving projective measurement can be simulated at low overhead by another protocol involving only interferometric measurement.

DOI
10.4230/lipics.tqc.2015.245

Related papers

Interferometry versus projective measurement of anyons

Michael Hartley Freedman, Claire Levaillant

The distinct methods for measuring topological charge in a non-abelian anyonic system have been discussed in the literature: projective measurement of a single point-like quasiparticle and interferometric measurement of the total topological charge of a group of quasiparticles. Projective measurement by definition is only applied near a point and will project to a topological charge sector near that point. Thus, if it is to be applied to a \emph{group} of anyons to project to a \emph{total} charge, then the anyons must first be fused one by one to obtain a single anyon carrying the collective charge. We show that interferometric measurement is strictly stronger: Any protocol involving projective measurement can be simulated at low overhead by another protocol involving only interferometric measurement.

arXiv:1501.01339•Jan 7, 2015•4 citations

Decoherence of Anyonic Charge in Interferometry Measurements

Parsa Bonderson, Kirill Shtengel, Johannes K. Slingerland

We examine interferometric measurements of the topological charge of (non-Abelian) anyons. The target's topological charge is measured from its effect on the interference of probe particles sent through the interferometer. We find that superpositions of distinct anyonic charges a and a' in the target decohere (exponentially in the number of probes particles used) when the probes have nontrivial monodromy with the charges that may be fused with a to give a'.

arXiv:quant-ph/0608119•Physical Review Letters•Feb 12, 2007•25 citations

Dissecting topological quantum computation

James R. Wootton

Anyons are quasiparticles that may be realized in two dimensional systems. They come in two types, the simpler Abelian anyons and the more complex non-Abelian anyons. Both of these have been considered as a means for quantum computation, but non-Abelian anyons are usually assumed to be better suited to the task. Here we challenge this view, demonstrating that Abelian anyon models have as much potential as some simple non-Abelian models. First the means to perform quantum computation with Abelian anyon models is considered. These models, like many non-Abelian models, cannot realize universal quantum computation by braiding alone. Non-topological operations must be used in addition, whose complexity depends on the physical means by which the anyons are realized. Here we consider anyons based on spin lattice models, with single spin measurements playing the role of non-topological operations. The computational power achieved by various kinds of measurement is explored and the requirements for universality are determined. The possibility to simulate non-Abelian anyons using Abelian ones is then considered. Finally, a non-Abelian quantum memory is dissected in order to determine the means by which it provides fault-tolerant storage of information. This understanding is then employed to build equivalent quantum memories with Abelian anyon models. The methodology provides with the means to demonstrate that Abelian models have the capability to simulate non-Abelian anyons, and to realize the same computational power and fault-tolerance as non Abelian models. Apart from the intellectual interest in relating topological models with each other, and of understanding the properties of non-Abelian anyons in terms of the simpler Abelian ones, these results can also be applied in the lab. The simpler structure of Abelian anyons means that their physical realization is more straightforward. The demonstration of non-Abelian properties with Abelian models therefore allows features of non-Abelian anyons to be realized with present and near future technology. Based on this possibility, proposals are made here for proof of principle experiments.

•Sep 1, 2010•2 citations

Entanglement spectroscopy of non-Abelian anyons: Reading off quantum dimensions of individual anyons

Eyal Cornfeld, L. Aviad Landau, Kirill Shtengel +1 more

We study the entanglement spectrum of topological systems hosting non-Abelian anyons. Akin to energy levels of a Hamiltonian, the entanglement spectrum is composed of symmetry multiplets. We find that the ratio between different eigenvalues within one multiplet is universal and is determined by the anyonic quantum dimensions. This result is a consequence of the conservation of the total topological charge. For systems with non-Abelian topological order, this generalizes known degeneracies of the entanglement spectrum, which are hallmarks of topological states. Experimental detection of these entanglement spectrum signatures may become possible in Majorana wires using multicopy schemes, allowing the measurement of quantum entanglement and its symmetry resolution.

arXiv:1810.01853•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Mar 20, 2019•69 citations

Interferometric braiding of non-Abelian anyons

Francesco Debortoli, Fabian Grusdt

The manipulation of non-Abelian anyons is a foundational ingredient for topological quantum computing and underlies topologically protected quantum memories. Here we analyze a quantum-impurity-based protocol for braiding non-Abelian anyons. Exploiting mobile impurities with addressable internal spin states, we provide a concrete protocol to experimentally measure the matrix elements of the $R$ and $F$ matrices that characterize the non-Abelian statistics of anyons. In particular, focusing on the case of Ising and Fibonacci anyons, we illustrate how the anyonic nature of the excitations emerges directly in the Ramsey interferometer we propose. Building on this framework, we further introduce a conventional-to-topological qubit encoder to transfer quantum information from conventional flying qubits into a topologically protected quantum memory.

quant-pharXiv:2610.06203•Oct 6, 2026•0 citations

Quasiparticles as detector of topological quantum phase transitions

Sourav Manna, N. S. Srivatsa, Julia Wildeboer +1 more

A number of tools have been developed to detect topological phase transitions in strongly correlated quantum systems.They apply under different conditions, but do not cover the full range of many-body models.It is hence desirable to further expand the toolbox.Here, we propose to use quasiparticle properties to detect quantum phase transitions.The approach is independent from the choice of boundary conditions, and it does not assume a particular lattice structure.The probe is hence suitable for, e.g., fractals and quasicrystals.The method requires that one can reliably create quasiparticles in the considered systems.In the simplest cases, this can be done by a pinning potential, while it is less straightforward in more complicated systems.We apply the method to several rather different examples, including one that cannot be handled by the commonly used probes, and in all the cases we find that the numerical costs are low.This is so, because a simple property, such as the charge of the anyons, is sufficient to detect the phase transition point.For some of the examples, this allows us to study larger systems and/or further parameter values compared to previous studies.

arXiv:1909.02046•Physical Review Research•Dec 31, 2020•16 citations
Two distinct methods for measuring topological charge in a nonabelian anyonic system have been discussed in the literature: projective measurement of a single point-like quasiparticle and interferometric measurement of the total topological charge of a group of quasiparticles. Projective measurement by definition is only applied near a point and will project to a topological charge sector near that point. Thus, if it is to be applied to a group of anyons to project to a total charge, then the anyons must first be fused one by one to obtain a single anyon carrying the collective charge. We show that interferometric measurement is strictly stronger: Any protocol involving projective measurement can be simulated at low overhead by another protocol involving only interferometric measurement.
The distinct methods for measuring topological charge in a non-abelian anyonic system have been discussed in the literature: projective measurement of a single point-like quasiparticle and interferometric measurement of the total topological charge of a group of quasiparticles. Projective measurement by definition is only applied near a point and will project to a topological charge sector near that point. Thus, if it is to be applied to a \emph{group} of anyons to project to a \emph{total} charge, then the anyons must first be fused one by one to obtain a single anyon carrying the collective charge. We show that interferometric measurement is strictly stronger: Any protocol involving projective measurement can be simulated at low overhead by another protocol involving only interferometric measurement.
Anyons are quasiparticles that may be realized in two dimensional systems. They come in two types, the simpler Abelian anyons and the more complex non-Abelian anyons. Both of these have been considered as a means for quantum computation, but non-Abelian anyons are usually assumed to be better suited to the task. Here we challenge this view, demonstrating that Abelian anyon models have as much potential as some simple non-Abelian models. First the means to perform quantum computation with Abelian anyon models is considered. These models, like many non-Abelian models, cannot realize universal quantum computation by braiding alone. Non-topological operations must be used in addition, whose complexity depends on the physical means by which the anyons are realized. Here we consider anyons based on spin lattice models, with single spin measurements playing the role of non-topological operations. The computational power achieved by various kinds of measurement is explored and the requirements for universality are determined. The possibility to simulate non-Abelian anyons using Abelian ones is then considered. Finally, a non-Abelian quantum memory is dissected in order to determine the means by which it provides fault-tolerant storage of information. This understanding is then employed to build equivalent quantum memories with Abelian anyon models. The methodology provides with the means to demonstrate that Abelian models have the capability to simulate non-Abelian anyons, and to realize the same computational power and fault-tolerance as non Abelian models. Apart from the intellectual interest in relating topological models with each other, and of understanding the properties of non-Abelian anyons in terms of the simpler Abelian ones, these results can also be applied in the lab. The simpler structure of Abelian anyons means that their physical realization is more straightforward. The demonstration of non-Abelian properties with Abelian models therefore allows features of non-Abelian anyons to be realized with present and near future technology. Based on this possibility, proposals are made here for proof of principle experiments.
We study the entanglement spectrum of topological systems hosting non-Abelian anyons. Akin to energy levels of a Hamiltonian, the entanglement spectrum is composed of symmetry multiplets. We find that the ratio between different eigenvalues within one multiplet is universal and is determined by the anyonic quantum dimensions. This result is a consequence of the conservation of the total topological charge. For systems with non-Abelian topological order, this generalizes known degeneracies of the entanglement spectrum, which are hallmarks of topological states. Experimental detection of these entanglement spectrum signatures may become possible in Majorana wires using multicopy schemes, allowing the measurement of quantum entanglement and its symmetry resolution.
The manipulation of non-Abelian anyons is a foundational ingredient for topological quantum computing and underlies topologically protected quantum memories. Here we analyze a quantum-impurity-based protocol for braiding non-Abelian anyons. Exploiting mobile impurities with addressable internal spin states, we provide a concrete protocol to experimentally measure the matrix elements of the RRR and FFF matrices that characterize the non-Abelian statistics of anyons. In particular, focusing on the case of Ising and Fibonacci anyons, we illustrate how the anyonic nature of the excitations emerges directly in the Ramsey interferometer we propose. Building on this framework, we further introduce a conventional-to-topological qubit encoder to transfer quantum information from conventional flying qubits into a topologically protected quantum memory.
A number of tools have been developed to detect topological phase transitions in strongly correlated quantum systems.They apply under different conditions, but do not cover the full range of many-body models.It is hence desirable to further expand the toolbox.Here, we propose to use quasiparticle properties to detect quantum phase transitions.The approach is independent from the choice of boundary conditions, and it does not assume a particular lattice structure.The probe is hence suitable for, e.g., fractals and quasicrystals.The method requires that one can reliably create quasiparticles in the considered systems.In the simplest cases, this can be done by a pinning potential, while it is less straightforward in more complicated systems.We apply the method to several rather different examples, including one that cannot be handled by the commonly used probes, and in all the cases we find that the numerical costs are low.This is so, because a simple property, such as the charge of the anyons, is sufficient to detect the phase transition point.For some of the examples, this allows us to study larger systems and/or further parameter values compared to previous studies.