Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Reply to “Comment on ‘Bose-Einstein condensation with a finite number of particles in a power-law trap’ ”

Amine Jaouadi, Mourad Telmini, Éric Charron

Published Jul 16, 2015• 2 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In this Reply to Comment we show that the criticisms raised by J. Noronha are based on a misapplication of the model we have proposed in A. Jaouadi, M. Telmini, and E. Charron [Phys. Rev. A 83, 023616 (2011)]. Here we explicitly discuss the range of validity of the approximations underlying our analytical model. We also show that the discrepancies pointed out for very small atom numbers and for very anisotropic traps are not surprising since these conditions exceed the range of validity of the model.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.92.017602

Related papers

Reply to "Comment on 'Bose-Einstein condensation with a finite number of particles in a power-law trap'"

Amine Jaouadi, Mourad Telmini, Éric Charron

In this reply we show that the criticisms raised by J. Noronha are based on a misapplication of the model we have proposed in [A. Jaouadi, M. Telmini, E. Charron, Phys. Rev. A 83, 023616 (2011)]. Here we explicitly discuss the range of validity of the approximations underlying our analytical model. We also show that the discrepancies pointed out for very small atom numbers and for very anisotropic traps are not surprising since these conditions exceed the range of validity of the model.

arXiv:1507.02016•Jul 8, 2015•0 citations

Comment on “Bose-Einstein condensation with a finite number of particles in a power-law trap”

José M. B. Noronha

In Jaouadi et al. [Phys. Rev. A 83, 023616 (2011)] the authors derive an analytical finite-size expansion for the Bose-Einstein condensation critical temperature of an ideal Bose gas in a generic power-law trap. In the case of a harmonic trap, this expansion adds higher-order terms to the well-known first-order correction. We point out a delicate point in connection to these results, showing that the claims of Jaouadi et al. should be treated with caution. In particular, for a harmonic trap, the given expansion yields results that, depending on what is considered to be the critical temperature of the finite system, do not generally improve on the established first-order correction. For some nonharmonic traps, the results differ at first order from other results in the literature.

arXiv:1507.00279•Physical Review A•Jul 16, 2015•4 citations

Bose-Einstein condensation with a finite number of particles in a power-law trap

Amine Jaouadi, Mourad Telmini, Éric Charron

Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC) of an ideal gas is investigated, beyond the thermodynamic limit, for a finite number $N$ of particles trapped in a generic three-dimensional power-law potential. We derive an analytical expression for the condensation temperature ${T}_{c}$ in terms of a power series in ${x}_{0}={\ensuremath{\varepsilon}}_{0}/{k}_{B}{T}_{c}$, where ${\ensuremath{\varepsilon}}_{0}$ denotes the zero-point energy of the trapping potential. This expression, which applies in Cartesian, cylindrical, and spherical power-law traps, is given analytically at infinite order. It is also given numerically for specific potential shapes as an expansion in powers of ${x}_{0}$ up to the second order. We show that, for a harmonic trap, the well-known first-order shift of the critical temperature $\ensuremath{\Delta}{T}_{c}/{T}_{c}\ensuremath{\propto}{N}^{\ensuremath{-}1/3}$ is inaccurate when $N\ensuremath{\leqslant}{10}^{5}$, the next order (proportional to ${N}^{\ensuremath{-}1/2}$) being significant. We also show that finite-size effects on the condensation temperature cancel out in a cubic trapping potential, e.g., $V(r)\ensuremath{\propto}{r}^{3}$. Finally, we show that in a generic power-law potential of higher order, e.g., $V(r)\ensuremath{\propto}{r}^{\ensuremath{\alpha}}$ with $\ensuremath{\alpha}>3$, the shift of the critical temperature becomes positive. This effect provides a large increase of ${T}_{c}$ for relatively small atom numbers. For instance, an increase of about $+$40% is expected with ${10}^{4}$ atoms in a $V(r)\ensuremath{\propto}{r}^{12}$ trapping potential.

arXiv:1011.6477•Physical Review A•Feb 24, 2011•29 citations

Comment on “Bose-Einstein condensation in low-dimensional traps”

Wu-Sheng Dai, Mi Xie

We show that the critical temperature of a one-dimensional gas confined by a power-law potential should be lower than that in the paper of Bagnato and Kleppner [Phys. Rev. A 44, 7439 (1991)]. Moreover, a sketch of the critical temperature is given in greater detail.

arXiv:quant-ph/0211189•Physical Review A•Feb 14, 2003•8 citations

Comment on "Strongly interacting one-dimensional Bose-Einstein condensates in harmonic traps"

Marvin D. Girardeau, Ewan M. Wright

A recent paper of Tanatar and Erkan [Phys. Rev. A 62, 053601 (2000)] discusses a density functional approach to the impenetrable point Bose gas in one dimension and an equation for the order parameter of the system, due originally to Kolomeisky et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1146 (2000)], is derived. We comment on the regime of validity of such a model and on qualitative differences between predictions of the density functional approach and known exact results.

arXiv:cond-mat/0010457•Oct 27, 2000•2 citations

Bose-Einstein condensation of a finite number of particles confined to harmonic traps

Raj K. Pathria

The onset of Bose-Einstein condensation in a sample of N atoms confined to harmonic traps is critically examined. The monotonic growth of the condensate fraction f and the nonmonotic variation of the specific heat C of the sample are studied in fine detail. While no temperature is truly critical, our analysis does provide a strong theoretical basis for recognizing a temperature ${T}^{*},$ that has been identified and advocated by previous authors, as the transition temperature of the system. The specific-heat maximum ${T}_{m}$ (which happens to be another important ``marker'' in this transition), the value of the specific heat at ${T=T}_{m},$ and the ``jump'' in the specific heat of the system when the number N becomes very large are all explicitly evaluated. Wherever comparison is possible, our analytical results are found to be in perfect agreement with the ones obtained numerically by Kirsten and Toms [Phys. Rev. A 54, 4188 (1996)] and by Haugerud, Haugest, and Ravndal [Phys. Lett. A 225, 18 (1997)].

Physical Review A•Aug 1, 1998•60 citations
In this Reply to Comment we show that the criticisms raised by J. Noronha are based on a misapplication of the model we have proposed in A. Jaouadi, M. Telmini, and E. Charron [Phys. Rev. A 83, 023616 (2011)]. Here we explicitly discuss the range of validity of the approximations underlying our analytical model. We also show that the discrepancies pointed out for very small atom numbers and for very anisotropic traps are not surprising since these conditions exceed the range of validity of the model.
In Jaouadi et al. [Phys. Rev. A 83, 023616 (2011)] the authors derive an analytical finite-size expansion for the Bose-Einstein condensation critical temperature of an ideal Bose gas in a generic power-law trap. In the case of a harmonic trap, this expansion adds higher-order terms to the well-known first-order correction. We point out a delicate point in connection to these results, showing that the claims of Jaouadi et al. should be treated with caution. In particular, for a harmonic trap, the given expansion yields results that, depending on what is considered to be the critical temperature of the finite system, do not generally improve on the established first-order correction. For some nonharmonic traps, the results differ at first order from other results in the literature.
Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC) of an ideal gas is investigated, beyond the thermodynamic limit, for a finite number NNN of particles trapped in a generic three-dimensional power-law potential. We derive an analytical expression for the condensation temperature Tc{T}_{c}Tc​ in terms of a power series in ${x}_{0}={\ensuremath{\varepsilon}}_{0}/{k}_{B}{T}_{c}$, where ${\ensuremath{\varepsilon}}_{0}$ denotes the zero-point energy of the trapping potential. This expression, which applies in Cartesian, cylindrical, and spherical power-law traps, is given analytically at infinite order. It is also given numerically for specific potential shapes as an expansion in powers of x0{x}_{0}x0​ up to the second order. We show that, for a harmonic trap, the well-known first-order shift of the critical temperature $\ensuremath{\Delta}{T}_{c}/{T}_{c}\ensuremath{\propto}{N}^{\ensuremath{-}1/3}$ is inaccurate when $N\ensuremath{\leqslant}{10}^{5}$, the next order (proportional to ${N}^{\ensuremath{-}1/2}$) being significant. We also show that finite-size effects on the condensation temperature cancel out in a cubic trapping potential, e.g., $V(r)\ensuremath{\propto}{r}^{3}$. Finally, we show that in a generic power-law potential of higher order, e.g., $V(r)\ensuremath{\propto}{r}^{\ensuremath{\alpha}}$ with $\ensuremath{\alpha}>3$, the shift of the critical temperature becomes positive. This effect provides a large increase of Tc{T}_{c}Tc​ for relatively small atom numbers. For instance, an increase of about $+$40% is expected with 104{10}^{4}104 atoms in a $V(r)\ensuremath{\propto}{r}^{12}$ trapping potential.
The onset of Bose-Einstein condensation in a sample of N atoms confined to harmonic traps is critically examined. The monotonic growth of the condensate fraction f and the nonmonotic variation of the specific heat C of the sample are studied in fine detail. While no temperature is truly critical, our analysis does provide a strong theoretical basis for recognizing a temperature T∗,{T}^{*},T∗, that has been identified and advocated by previous authors, as the transition temperature of the system. The specific-heat maximum Tm{T}_{m}Tm​ (which happens to be another important ``marker'' in this transition), the value of the specific heat at T=Tm,{T=T}_{m},T=Tm​, and the ``jump'' in the specific heat of the system when the number N becomes very large are all explicitly evaluated. Wherever comparison is possible, our analytical results are found to be in perfect agreement with the ones obtained numerically by Kirsten and Toms [Phys. Rev. A 54, 4188 (1996)] and by Haugerud, Haugest, and Ravndal [Phys. Lett. A 225, 18 (1997)].