320 In 1935, three physicists (Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen) proposed a paradox that questioned the interpretations of quantum mechanics (QM). The fact that, apparently, quantum information had to be transmitted more rapidly than the speed of light seemed to breach of wave functions (WFs) that collapsed. Quantum systems (QS) easily entangle each other so that their WFs combine. The fact that they do or not do in phase dictates the result. Thus, quantum information can easily escape, which leads to the loss of cohesion of a quantum state (QSt). Large objects get decoherence more rapidly than smaller ones. Quantum computers (QCs) can someday succeed in substituting Si-based technologies. They can be potent enough to decode any code. They are already only prototypes and handle binary data fragments in the form of quantum bits or atomic states. Based on QM, they could exploit phenomena, for example, entanglement, in order to carry out millions calculations at the time. At supercold temperatures, some metals, alloys, and ceramics completely lose their electric resistance. Currents are free of flowing during thousands of millions years without losing any energy. The reason is QM. On matching, and with a slight shake of the cations lattice, electrons can be kept together. Feynman’s 1981 conjecture, in which QCs can be programmed to simulate any local QS, is correct. Quantum simulators are controllable QSs that could be used to simulate other QSs. Being able to tackle problems that are intractable on classical computers, quantum simulators would provide a means of exploring new physical phenomena. How may quantum simulators become a reality in the near future, as the required technologies are now within research? Quantum simulators, relying on the coherent control of neutral atoms, ions, photons, or electrons, would allow studying problems in a number of fields, for example, condensed matter physics, highenergy physics, cosmology, atomic physics, and quantum chemistry. The long-term promises of quantum simulators are far-reaching but the field needs clearly defined short-term goals.
320 In 1935, three physicists (Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen) proposed a paradox that questioned the interpretations of quantum mechanics (QM). The fact that, apparently, quantum information had to be transmitted more rapidly than the speed of light seemed to breach of wave functions (WFs) that collapsed. Quantum systems (QS) easily entangle each other so that their WFs combine. The fact that they do or not do in phase dictates the result. Thus, quantum information can easily escape, which leads to the loss of cohesion of a quantum state (QSt). Large objects get decoherence more rapidly than smaller ones. Quantum computers (QCs) can someday succeed in substituting Si-based technologies. They can be potent enough to decode any code. They are already only prototypes and handle binary data fragments in the form of quantum bits or atomic states. Based on QM, they could exploit phenomena, for example, entanglement, in order to carry out millions calculations at the time. At supercold temperatures, some metals, alloys, and ceramics completely lose their electric resistance. Currents are free of flowing during thousands of millions years without losing any energy. The reason is QM. On matching, and with a slight shake of the cations lattice, electrons can be kept together. Feynman’s 1981 conjecture, in which QCs can be programmed to simulate any local QS, is correct. Quantum simulators are controllable QSs that could be used to simulate other QSs. Being able to tackle problems that are intractable on classical computers, quantum simulators would provide a means of exploring new physical phenomena. How may quantum simulators become a reality in the near future, as the required technologies are now within research? Quantum simulators, relying on the coherent control of neutral atoms, ions, photons, or electrons, would allow studying problems in a number of fields, for example, condensed matter physics, highenergy physics, cosmology, atomic physics, and quantum chemistry. The long-term promises of quantum simulators are far-reaching but the field needs clearly defined short-term goals.
We always have had a great deal of difficulty in understanding the world view that quantum mechanics represents. At least I do, because I'm an old enough man that I haven't got to the point that this stuff is obvious to me … It has not yet become obvious to me that there is no real problem. I cannot define the real problem, therefore I suspect there is no real problem, but I'm not sure there's no real problem. Richard Feynman Max Born and quantum probabilities In this chapter, we will take a short break from our survey of successful applications of quantum mechanics to take a closer look at the foundations of this great edifice of modern physics. In a sense, we are now disobeying Feynman's warning about the results of the double slit experiment of chapter 1. We shall now ask Feynman's ‘forbidden’ question ‘But how can it be like that?’ Nobody disputes that quantum mechanics has been magnificently successful, enabling us to make correct quantitative calculations of atomic and nuclear effects. But there is a great divergence of opinion about the implications of quantum mechanics for the nature of matter, and indeed, of reality itself. To avoid becoming embroiled in a purely philosophical mire, we will focus on two famous paradoxes. The first of these is the ‘Einstein–Podolsky-Rosen’ paradox, named after its originators Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen, and usually abbreviated by the initials ‘EPR’. The second paradox is named after ‘Schrödinger's cat’.
Quantum many-body systems, as they appear in different branches of physics and chemistry, are very hard to simulate. The number of parameters defining their quantum states grows exponentially with the number of constituents. This prevents us from exploring and investigating relevant problems involving relatively small numbers of subsystems even with the help of the most powerful supercomputers. Richard Feynman already noticed this difficulty back in 1981 when he wrote his visionary paper “Simulating Physics with Computers” [Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21:6/7, 467 (1982)]. There, he proposed to use quantum systems (as opposed to classical computers) to perform the simulation and in this way to circumvent the need to store and compute a colossal number of parameters, necessary to describe the pertaining superpositions. What was a visionary idea at that time has become a very active field of research in the last few years. The extraordinary progress of both theoretical and experimental research in quantum physics allows us now to tame, control, and manipulate various quantum systems with unprecedented precision. Laser, magnetic, electronic and other technologies enable us to arrange quantum subsystems in different geometries, modify their interactions, and detect them. This allows us to engineer Hamiltonians and emulate systems displaying some of the most intriguing quantum phenomena. This tremendous progress is, to a large extent, due to the pioneering work of many researchers during the last twenty to thirty years. Here, the investigations of basic phenomena with one or few atoms or photons were of particular impact. The degree of control achieved in the experiments has enabled the observation of mind-boggling quantum effects, related to the superposition principle or to entangled states, and their disappearance due to decoherence. In fact, the 2012 Nobel Prize has been awarded to two scientists, S. Haroche and D. Wineland, for such ground-breaking experiments. Such experiments, often in combination with laser cooling of atoms or ions and Bose-Einstein condensation, have formed one of the pillars on which the field of quantum simulations is being established. Quantum simulations with cold atoms, either in magnetic traps or in optical lattices, with trapped ions, with photons, with superconducting devices, with quantum dots, etc., have been theoretically proposed and experimentally considered by many researchers. Most of the proposals so far deal with problems in condensed matter physics that are either difficult to tackle with modern supercomputers or are difficult to observe in solid state systems. This has established a very close link between different disciplines, like atomic, molecular, and optical (AMO) physics, and condensed matter physics. Although some of the experiments are still in their infancy, and a lot of research is still needed, the extraordinary progress made in all these research areas during the last few years makes us feel confident that in the not too distant future quantum simulators will provide a key tool to investigate many-body quantum systems. Furthermore, we also expect that quantum simulators will help quantum physicists to establish new and fruitful links to other scientific communities, like high-energy physics or quantum chemistry. The present special issue contains various review papers as well as research papers on quantum simulations. It starts out with two papers written by last year's Nobel Prize winners describing their foundational work (Wineland, p. 739 and Haroche, p. 763). The issue continues with three thorough, invited review papers covering different topics on quantum simulations. The first one reviews recent theoretical proposals to use cold atoms in optical lattices to simulate lattice gauge theories of the sort that appear in high-energy physics (U.-J. Wiese, p. 783). The second covers both theoretical proposals and experimental demonstrations of cold-atom systems to simulate the physics of matter in the presence of gauge fields, displaying so-called topological phenomena, which so far have only been observed in solid-state systems (I. Spielman, p. 794). The third one contains an extensive overview and new proposals to perform a broad range of quantum simulations using quantum dot systems (P. Barthelmy et al., p. 813). The issue also includes six original papers with a variety of theoretical proposals as well as the introduction of novel theoretical techniques related to the field of quantum simulation. The field of quantum simulations is just starting, but we are confident that it will soon generate an even larger plethora of new ideas and discoveries, trigger interdisciplinary research, and lead us to the adventure of describing and understanding the quantum world. We hope that this special issue will help future researchers in such an exciting adventure. Rainer Blatt received his PhD degree in physics from the University of Mainz in 1981. As a postdoctoral fellow he worked on atomic beam cooling in Boulder, CO and later as a research assistant in Hamburg with single trapped ions. In 1995 he accepted a chair in experimental physics at the University of Innsbruck working on quantum information processing with trapped ions. Since 2003 he is also scientific director at the Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information (IQOQI) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences. Immanuel Bloch received his PhD degree in physics from the Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich in 2000. As a junior group leader, he continued in Munich starting his work on ultracold quantum gases in optical lattices. In 2008 he was appointed scientific director of the newly founded division on Quantum Many-Body Systems at the Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics. Since 2009 he also holds a chair in quantum optics at the Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich. Ignacio Cirac received his PhD degree in physics from the Universidad Complutense de Madrid in 1991. He was professor at the Universities of Castilla-La Mancha and Innsbruck from 1991–1996 and 1996–2001, respectively. In 2001 he joined the Max-Planck Institute of Quantum Optics, where he leads the Theory Division. His current research interests include quantum information theory and quantum optics. Peter Zoller obtained his doctorate from the University of Innsbruck in 1977. He was Max Kade Fellow at the University of Southern California from 1978/79, and was JILA visiting Fellow 1981/82 and 1988. In 1990 he became JILA Fellow and professor of physics at the University of Colorado. At the end of 1994, he accepted a chair at the University of Innsbruck, where he has worked ever since. Since 2003, he has also held the position of Scientific Director at the Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information (IQOQI) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences.
In 1935, Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen (EPR) published a thought experiment that is entirely correct, has been demonstrated in real experiments, and is now the most famous in quantum physics. Their pioneering work described, for the first time, quantum correlations and can be regarded as a very early glimpse into today's 'deep' quantum technologies, by which I mean those that enhance functionality by making use of quantum correlations. However, their work also contains a paradox that Erwin Schroedinger had already recognised as such in 1935 and which has since been cemented by the so-called Bell experiments. Here, I am now able to pinpoint the origin of the paradox within the chain of reasoning, which ultimately resolves the paradox.
Quantum simulators are controllable quantum systems that can be used to simulate other quantum systems. Being able to tackle problems that are intractable on classical computers, quantum simulators would provide a means of exploring new physical phenomena. We present an overview of how quantum simulators may become a reality in the near future as the required technologies are now within reach. Quantum simulators, relying on the coherent control of neutral atoms, ions, photons, or electrons, would allow studying problems in various fields including condensed-matter physics, high-energy physics, cosmology, atomic physics, and quantum chemistry.
Quantum mechanics is the most ground-breaking and fascinating theoretical concept developed in physics during the past century. Much of our present understanding of the microscopic world and its extension into the macroscopic world, including modern technical applications, is based upon quantum mechanics. We have experienced a remarkable development of information and communication technology during the past two decades, to a large extent depending upon successful fabrication of smaller and smaller components and circuits. However, we are finally approaching the physical limits of component miniaturization as we enter a microscopic world ruled by quantum mechanics. Present technology is mainly based upon classical physics such as mechanics and electromagnetism. We now face a similar paradigm shift as was experienced two hundred years ago, at the time of the industrial revolution. Engineered construction of systems is currently increasingly based on quantum physics instead of classical physics, and quantum information is replacing much of classical communication. Quantum computing is one of the most exciting sub-fields of this revolution. Individual quantum systems can be used to store and process information. They are called quantum bits, or qubits for short. A quantum computer could eventually be constructed by combining a number of qubits that act coherently. Important computations can be performed much more quickly than by classical computers. However, while we control and measure a qubit, it must be sufficiently isolated from its environment to avoid noise that causes decoherence at the same time. Currently, low temperature is generally needed to obtain sufficiently long decoherence times. Single qubits of many different kinds can be built and manipulated; some research groups have managed to successfully couple qubits and perform rudimentary logic operations. However, the fundamental problems, such as decoherence, entanglement, quantum measurements and error correction, have yet to be solved. It has been predicted that quantum computers will be able to perform certain complicated computations or simulations in minutes or hours instead of years as with present computers. So far there exist very few useful quantum algorithms; however there is hope that the development of these will be stimulated once there is a breakthrough in hardware. Remarkable progress has been made in quantum engineering and quantum measurements, but a large scale quantum computer is still far off. Quantum communication and cryptography are much closer to the market than a quantum computer. The development of quantum information has meant a large push in the field of quantum physics, that previously could only be studied in the microscopic world. Artificial atoms, realized by circuit technology and mimicking the properties of 'natural' atoms, are one example of the new possibilities opened up by quantum engineering. Several different types of qubits have been suggested. Some are based upon microscopic entities, like atoms and ions in traps, or nuclear spins in molecules. They can have long coherence times (i.e. a long period allowing many operations, of the order of 10 000, to be performed before the state needs to be refreshed) but they are difficult to integrate into large systems. Other qubits are based upon solid state components that facilitate integration and coupling between qubits, but they suffer from interactions with the environment and their coherent states have a limited lifetime. Advanced experiments have been performed with superconducting Josephson junctions and many breakthroughs have been reported in the last few years. They have an advantage in the inherent coherence of superconducting Cooper pairs over macroscopic distances. We chose to focus the Nobel Symposium on Qubits for Future Quantum Information on superconducting qubits to allow for depth in discussions, but at the same time to allow comparison with other types of qubits that may prevail in the long run. The purpose of the symposium was to bring together leading researchers in adjoining fields. Often, microscopic qubits are considered at conferences within atomic, molecular and optical physics, while macroscopic ones belong to the solid state community. At the symposium, we experienced objective comparisons between different types of qubits—pros and cons as well as prospects. One example was the topic of quantum electrodynamics of superconducting circuits where qubits are coupled to a high- Q microwave resonator. This breakthrough technology was covered in several talks and was compared, in detail, with the corresponding case of light coupled to atoms in a cavity. A highlight was the presentation of how arbitrary photon states can be created in a cavity and the measurement of the corresponding Wigner functions. A Nobel Symposium provides an excellent opportunity to bring together a group of outstanding scientists for a stimulating exchange of ideas and results. The present symposium took place in Gothenburg, 25–28 May 2009. In order to allow local researchers and students to get a feeling of what is happening in the field, the first day of the symposium was held at the Chalmers campus. The remaining three days were spent at the mansion built by William Chalmers, the benefactor behind Chalmers University of Technology. Thirty-three speakers gave popular lectures open to the general public, overviews of different types of qubits, quantum phenomena, and quantum computing requirements, as well as specialized contributions in six sessions, and ten posters were displayed. The list of participants, program, abstracts and summaries of presentations is given at www.chalmers.se/mc2/EN/nobel-symposium-2009 . In order to encourage constructive interactions and discussions, ample time was given to extensive critical discussions and to individual meetings in relaxing and stimulating environments. Questions and discussions followed all talks but longer, more extensive, discussions of about one hour ended each session. These discussions were initiated by a special questioner (a kind of 'devil's advocate'). Receptions were given by the President of Chalmers and by the City of Gothenburg. The participants also sailed with SS Bohuslän in the archipelago outside the city. The symposium was sponsored by the Nobel Foundation through its Nobel Symposium Committee and was organized by Thilo Bauch, Tord Claeson, Per Delsing, Ann-Marie Frykestig, Eva Hellberg, Göran Johansson, Göoran Wendin, and Chris Wilson. Special thanks are given to the program committee: John Clarke, Daniel Estève, Steve Girvin, Anne l'Huillier, Anthony Leggett, and Mikko Paalanen. The editor of the proceedings is Göran Johansson.
Simulating quantum mechanics is known to be a difficult computational problem, especially when dealing with large systems. However, this difficulty may be overcome by using some controllable quantum system to study another less controllable or accessible quantum system, i.e., quantum simulation. Quantum simulation promises to have applications in the study of many problems in, e.g., condensed-matter physics, high-energy physics, atomic physics, quantum chemistry, and cosmology. Quantum simulation could be implemented using quantum computers, but also with simpler, analog devices that would require less control, and therefore, would be easier to construct. A number of quantum systems such as neutral atoms, ions, polar molecules, electrons in semiconductors, superconducting circuits, nuclear spins, and photons have been proposed as quantum simulators. This review outlines the main theoretical and experimental aspects of quantum simulation and emphasizes some of the challenges and promises of this fast-growing field.