Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Italian Quantum Information Science Conference (IQIS)

Continuous and Pulsed Quantum Control

Giovanni Gramegna, Daniel Klaus Burgarth, Paolo Facchi A, Saverio Pascazio

Published Jun 24, 2019• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

We consider two alternative procedures which can be used to control the evolution of a generic finite-dimensional quantum system, one hinging upon a strong continuous coupling with a control potential and the other based on the application of frequently repeated pulses onto the system. Despite the practical and conceptual difference between them, they lead to the same dynamics, characterised by a partitioning of the Hilbert space into sectors among which transitions are inhibited by dynamical superselection rules.

DOI
10.3390/proceedings2019012015

Related papers

Control of decoherence (Invited Paper)

Saverio Pascazio, Paolo Facchi A

We discuss three control strategies aimed at countering the effects of decoherence: the first hinges on frequent projective measurements, the second on frequent unitary "kicks" ("bang-bang" pulses) and the third on a strong continuous coupling. Decoherence is suppressed if the frequency N of the measurements/kicks is large enough or if the coupling K is sufficiently strong: in all these cases, the Hilbert space of the system splits into invariant subspaces, among which any transition is hindered. However, if N or K are large, but not extremely large, all these control procedures accelerate decoherence.

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE•May 23, 2005•1 citation

Control of decoherence: Analysis and comparison of three different strategies

Paolo Facchi A, S. Tasaki, Saverio Pascazio +3 more

We analyze and compare three different strategies, all aimed at controlling and eventually halting decoherence. The first strategy hinges upon the quantum Zeno effect, the second makes use of frequent unitary interruptions (``bang-bang'' pulses and their generalization, quantum dynamical decoupling), and the third uses a strong, continuous coupling. Decoherence is shown to be suppressed only if the frequency $N$ of the measurements or pulses is large enough or if the coupling $K$ is sufficiently strong. Otherwise, if $N$ or $K$ is large, but not extremely large, all these control procedures accelerate decoherence. We investigate the problem in a general setting and then consider some practical examples, relevant for quantum computation.

arXiv:quant-ph/0403205•Physical Review A•Feb 8, 2005•213 citations

INVARIANT SUBSPACES AND CONTROL OF DECOHERENCE

Paolo Facchi A, V.L. LEPORE, Saverio Pascazio

We discuss three control strategies, all aimed at countering the effects of deciherence. The first strategy hinges upon the quantum Zeno effect, the second makes use of frequent unitary interruptions ("bang-bang" pulses) and the third of a strong, continuous coupling. Decoherence is suppressed if the frequency N of the measurements/pulses is large enough or if the coupling K is sufficiently strong. However, if N or K are large, but not sufficiently large, all procedures accelerate decoherence.

•Mar 1, 2006•0 citations

CONTROL OF DECOHERENCE VIA QUANTUM ZENO SUBSPACES

Paolo Facchi A, Hiromichi Nakazato, Saverio Pascazio +1 more

We discuss three control strategies, whose objective is to counter the effects of decoherence: the first strategy hinges upon the quantum Zeno effect, the second makes use of frequent unitary interruptions ("bang-bang" pulses), and the third of a strong, continuous coupling. Decoherence can be suppressed only if the frequency τ-1 of the measurements/pulses is large enough or if the coupling K is sufficiently strong. Otherwise, if τ-1 or K are large, but not sufficiently large, all these control procedures accelerate decoherence.

International Journal of Modern Physics B•May 20, 2006•2 citations

1 Quantum Zeno dynamics and quantum Zeno subspaces ∗

Paolo Facchi A, Saverio Pascazio C

A quantum Zeno dynamics can be obtained by means of frequent measurements, frequent unitary kicks or a strong continuous coupling and yields a partition of the total Hilbert space into quantum Zeno subspaces, among which any transition is hindered. We focus on the “continuous ” version of the quantum Zeno effect and look at several interesting examples. We first analyze these examples in practical terms, towards applications, then propose a novel experiment. 1

•Jan 1, 2009•62 citations

Unification of dynamical decoupling and the quantum Zeno effect

Paolo Facchi A, Daniel A. Lidar, Saverio Pascazio

We unify the quantum Zeno effect (QZE) and the ``bang-bang'' (BB) decoupling method for suppressing decoherence in open quantum systems: in both cases strong coupling to an external system or apparatus induces a dynamical superselection rule that partitions the open system's Hilbert space into quantum Zeno subspaces. Our unification makes use of von Neumann' s ergodic theorem and avoids making any of the symmetry assumptions usually made in discussions of BB. Thus we are able to generalize the BB to arbitrary fast and strong pulse sequences, requiring no symmetry, and to show the existence of two alternatives to a pulsed BB: continuous decoupling and pulsed measurements. Our unified treatment enables us to derive limits on the efficacy of the BB method: we explicitly show that the inverse QZE implies that the BB can in some cases accelerate, rather than inhibit, decoherence.

arXiv:quant-ph/0303132•Physical Review A•Mar 22, 2004•338 citations
We consider two alternative procedures which can be used to control the evolution of a generic finite-dimensional quantum system, one hinging upon a strong continuous coupling with a control potential and the other based on the application of frequently repeated pulses onto the system. Despite the practical and conceptual difference between them, they lead to the same dynamics, characterised by a partitioning of the Hilbert space into sectors among which transitions are inhibited by dynamical superselection rules.
We discuss three control strategies aimed at countering the effects of decoherence: the first hinges on frequent projective measurements, the second on frequent unitary "kicks" ("bang-bang" pulses) and the third on a strong continuous coupling. Decoherence is suppressed if the frequency N of the measurements/kicks is large enough or if the coupling K is sufficiently strong: in all these cases, the Hilbert space of the system splits into invariant subspaces, among which any transition is hindered. However, if N or K are large, but not extremely large, all these control procedures accelerate decoherence.
We analyze and compare three different strategies, all aimed at controlling and eventually halting decoherence. The first strategy hinges upon the quantum Zeno effect, the second makes use of frequent unitary interruptions (``bang-bang'' pulses and their generalization, quantum dynamical decoupling), and the third uses a strong, continuous coupling. Decoherence is shown to be suppressed only if the frequency NNN of the measurements or pulses is large enough or if the coupling KKK is sufficiently strong. Otherwise, if NNN or KKK is large, but not extremely large, all these control procedures accelerate decoherence. We investigate the problem in a general setting and then consider some practical examples, relevant for quantum computation.
We discuss three control strategies, all aimed at countering the effects of deciherence. The first strategy hinges upon the quantum Zeno effect, the second makes use of frequent unitary interruptions ("bang-bang" pulses) and the third of a strong, continuous coupling. Decoherence is suppressed if the frequency N of the measurements/pulses is large enough or if the coupling K is sufficiently strong. However, if N or K are large, but not sufficiently large, all procedures accelerate decoherence.
We discuss three control strategies, whose objective is to counter the effects of decoherence: the first strategy hinges upon the quantum Zeno effect, the second makes use of frequent unitary interruptions ("bang-bang" pulses), and the third of a strong, continuous coupling. Decoherence can be suppressed only if the frequency τ-1 of the measurements/pulses is large enough or if the coupling K is sufficiently strong. Otherwise, if τ-1 or K are large, but not sufficiently large, all these control procedures accelerate decoherence.
We unify the quantum Zeno effect (QZE) and the ``bang-bang'' (BB) decoupling method for suppressing decoherence in open quantum systems: in both cases strong coupling to an external system or apparatus induces a dynamical superselection rule that partitions the open system's Hilbert space into quantum Zeno subspaces. Our unification makes use of von Neumann' s ergodic theorem and avoids making any of the symmetry assumptions usually made in discussions of BB. Thus we are able to generalize the BB to arbitrary fast and strong pulse sequences, requiring no symmetry, and to show the existence of two alternatives to a pulsed BB: continuous decoupling and pulsed measurements. Our unified treatment enables us to derive limits on the efficacy of the BB method: we explicitly show that the inverse QZE implies that the BB can in some cases accelerate, rather than inhibit, decoherence.