Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical

Quantum circuits and low-degree polynomials over F 2

Ashley Montanaro

Published Jan 3, 2017• 28 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract In this work we explore a correspondence between quantum circuits and low-degree polynomials over the finite field F 2 . Any quantum circuit made up of Hadamard, Z, controlled-Z and controlled-controlled-Z gates gives rise to a degree-3 polynomial over F 2 such that calculating quantum circuit amplitudes is equivalent to counting zeroes of the corresponding polynomial. We exploit this connection, which is especially clean and simple for this particular gate set, in two directions. First, we give proofs of classical hardness results based on quantum circuit concepts. Second, we find efficient classical simulation algorithms for certain classes of quantum circuits based on efficient algorithms for classes of polynomials.

DOI
10.1088/1751-8121/aa565f

Related papers

Quantum circuits and low-degree polynomials over F_2

Ashley Montanaro

In this work we explore a correspondence between quantum circuits and low-degree polynomials over the finite field F_2. Any quantum circuit made up of Hadamard, Z, controlled-Z and controlled-controlled-Z gates gives rise to a degree-3 polynomial over F_2 such that calculating quantum circuit amplitudes is equivalent to counting zeroes of the corresponding polynomial. We exploit this connection, which is especially clean and simple for this particular gate set, in two directions. First, we give proofs of classical hardness results based on quantum circuit concepts. Second, we find efficient classical simulation algorithms for certain classes of quantum circuits based on efficient algorithms for classes of polynomials.

arXiv:1607.08473•Jul 28, 2016•5 citations

Quantum computing and polynomial equations over the finite field Z_2

Christopher M. Dawson, Henry L. Haselgrove, Andrew P. Hines +3 more

What is the computational power of a quantum computer? We show that determining the output of a quantum computation is equivalent to counting the number of solutions to an easily computed set of polynomials defined over the finite field Z_2. This connection allows simple proofs to be given for two known relationships between quantum and classical complexity classes.

arXiv:quant-ph/0408129•Aug 20, 2004•44 citations

Quantum Algorithms and Hardness for Point-Count Approximation over Finite Fields

Yota Maeda, Hiroshi Yano

We study the approximation of the number of solutions of Laurent polynomials over finite fields. For a Laurent polynomial \[f(x)=\sum_{j=1}^{s}a_jx^{u_j}\in \mathbb{F}_q[x_1^{\pm1},\ldots,x_n^{\pm1}], \] let $U$ be its augmented support matrix whose columns are $(1,u_j)$ with rank $ρ$ and $N(f) := \# \{x\in (\mathbb{F}_q^\times)^n \mid f(x)=0\}$ be its torus point count. Our first main result is a quantum algorithm that outputs $\widehat{N}(f)$ satisfying \[ |\widehat{N}(f) - N(f)| \le \varepsilon q^{n+s/2-ρ} \] with success probability $1-δ$. Provided that $ρ$ and $\|U\|_\infty$ are bounded, the algorithm runs in both classical bit and quantum gate complexity $\mathrm{poly}(n, s, \log q, 1/\varepsilon, \log(1/δ))$. It provides finer resolution than relative-error approximations in general settings. To the best of our knowledge, in the explicit finite-field input model considered here, no previous algorithm achieves this additive accuracy with running time polynomial in $\log q$. Van Dam (arXiv:quant-ph/0405081) conjectured the existence of such an algorithm under the assumption of an oracle reflecting the algebraic properties of the polynomial. In contrast, by exploiting a point-counting formula derived from character sums over finite fields, we develop an alternative approach that efficiently approximates the number of points without assuming the existence of such an oracle. As a second main result, we prove that the same approximation problem becomes $\#$P-hard under randomized polynomial-time Turing reductions when the support matrix $U$ varies freely as part of the input. Thus, taken together, our results clarify how the effectiveness of the quantum approach depends on the tradeoff between the accuracy scale and the support parameters of the input polynomial.

quant-pharXiv:2608.23929•Aug 26, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Circuits That Can Be Simulated Classically in Polynomial Time

Leslie Gabriel Valiant

A model of quantum computation based on unitary matrix operations was introduced by Feynman and Deutsch. It has been asked whether the power of this model exceeds that of classical Turing machines. We show here that a significant class of these quantum computations can be simulated classically in polynomial time. In particular we show that two-bit operations characterized by 4 × 4 matrices in which the sixteen entries obey a set of five polynomial relations can be composed according to certain rules to yield a class of circuits that can be simulated classically in polynomial time. This contrasts with the known universality of two-bit operations and demonstrates that efficient quantum computation of restricted classes is reconcilable with the Polynomial Time Turing Hypothesis. Therefore, it is possible that, The techniques introduced bring the quantum computational model within the realm of algebraic complexity theory. In a manner consistent with one view of quantum physics, the wave function is simulated deterministically, and randomization arises only in the course of making measurements. The results generalize the quantum model in that they do not require the matrices to be unitary. In a different direction these techniques also yield deterministic polynomial time algorithms for the decision and parity problems for certain classes of read-twice Boolean formulae. All our results are based on the use of gates that are defined in terms of their graph matching properties.

SIAM Journal on Computing•Jan 1, 2002•310 citations

Quantum computing and polynomial equations over Z_2

Christopher M. Dawson, Henry L. Haselgrove, Andrew P. Hines +3 more

What is the computational power of a quantum computer? We show that determining the output of a quantum computation is equivalent to counting the number of solutions to an easily computed set of polynomials defined over the finite field Z_2. This connection allows simple proofs to be given for two known relationships between quantum and classical complexity classes, namely BQP/P/\#P and BQP/PP.

Quantum Information and Computation•May 1, 2005•26 citations

Efficient explicit circuit for quantum state preparation of piecewise continuous functions

Nikita Guseynov, Nana Liu

Efficiently uploading data into quantum states is essential for many quantum algorithms to achieve advantage across various applications. In this paper, we address this challenge by developing a method to upload a polynomial function f ( x ) on the interval x ∈ [ − 1 , 1 ] into a pure quantum state consisting of qubits, where a discretized f ( x ) is the amplitude of this state. The preparation cost has O ( n log n ) scaling in the number of qubits n and linear scaling with the degree of the polynomial Q . This efficiency allows the preparation of states whose amplitudes correspond to high-degree polynomials (up to 10 4 ), enabling accurate approximation of functions that admit efficient polynomial series representations and whose amplitude profiles are not extremely localized. We provide a fully explicit circuit realization, based on four real polynomials that meet specific parity and boundedness conditions. We extend this construction to cover piecewise polynomial functions, a case not previously addressed explicitly in the literature, the algorithm scaling linearly with the number of piecewise parts. Our method achieves efficient quantum circuit implementation and we present detailed gate counting and resource analysis.

arXiv:2411.01131•Physical Review A•Dec 9, 2025•4 citations
Abstract In this work we explore a correspondence between quantum circuits and low-degree polynomials over the finite field F 2 . Any quantum circuit made up of Hadamard, Z, controlled-Z and controlled-controlled-Z gates gives rise to a degree-3 polynomial over F 2 such that calculating quantum circuit amplitudes is equivalent to counting zeroes of the corresponding polynomial. We exploit this connection, which is especially clean and simple for this particular gate set, in two directions. First, we give proofs of classical hardness results based on quantum circuit concepts. Second, we find efficient classical simulation algorithms for certain classes of quantum circuits based on efficient algorithms for classes of polynomials.
In this work we explore a correspondence between quantum circuits and low-degree polynomials over the finite field F_2. Any quantum circuit made up of Hadamard, Z, controlled-Z and controlled-controlled-Z gates gives rise to a degree-3 polynomial over F_2 such that calculating quantum circuit amplitudes is equivalent to counting zeroes of the corresponding polynomial. We exploit this connection, which is especially clean and simple for this particular gate set, in two directions. First, we give proofs of classical hardness results based on quantum circuit concepts. Second, we find efficient classical simulation algorithms for certain classes of quantum circuits based on efficient algorithms for classes of polynomials.
We study the approximation of the number of solutions of Laurent polynomials over finite fields. For a Laurent polynomial f(x)=∑j=1sajxuj∈Fq[x1±1,…,xn±1],f(x)=\sum_{j=1}^{s}a_jx^{u_j}\in \mathbb{F}_q[x_1^{\pm1},\ldots,x_n^{\pm1}], f(x)=∑j=1s​aj​xuj​∈Fq​[x1±1​,…,xn±1​], let UUU be its augmented support matrix whose columns are (1,uj)(1,u_j)(1,uj​) with rank ρρρ and N(f):=#{x∈(Fq×)n∣f(x)=0}N(f) := \# \{x\in (\mathbb{F}_q^\times)^n \mid f(x)=0\}N(f):=#{x∈(Fq×​)n∣f(x)=0} be its torus point count. Our first main result is a quantum algorithm that outputs N^(f)\widehat{N}(f)N(f) satisfying ∣N^(f)−N(f)∣≤εqn+s/2−ρ |\widehat{N}(f) - N(f)| \le \varepsilon q^{n+s/2-ρ} ∣N(f)−N(f)∣≤εqn+s/2−ρ with success probability 1−δ1-δ1−δ. Provided that ρρρ and ∥U∥∞\|U\|_\infty∥U∥∞​ are bounded, the algorithm runs in both classical bit and quantum gate complexity poly(n,s,log⁡q,1/ε,log⁡(1/δ))\mathrm{poly}(n, s, \log q, 1/\varepsilon, \log(1/δ))poly(n,s,logq,1/ε,log(1/δ)). It provides finer resolution than relative-error approximations in general settings. To the best of our knowledge, in the explicit finite-field input model considered here, no previous algorithm achieves this additive accuracy with running time polynomial in log⁡q\log qlogq. Van Dam (arXiv:quant-ph/0405081) conjectured the existence of such an algorithm under the assumption of an oracle reflecting the algebraic properties of the polynomial. In contrast, by exploiting a point-counting formula derived from character sums over finite fields, we develop an alternative approach that efficiently approximates the number of points without assuming the existence of such an oracle. As a second main result, we prove that the same approximation problem becomes #\##P-hard under randomized polynomial-time Turing reductions when the support matrix UUU varies freely as part of the input. Thus, taken together, our results clarify how the effectiveness of the quantum approach depends on the tradeoff between the accuracy scale and the support parameters of the input polynomial.
A model of quantum computation based on unitary matrix operations was introduced by Feynman and Deutsch. It has been asked whether the power of this model exceeds that of classical Turing machines. We show here that a significant class of these quantum computations can be simulated classically in polynomial time. In particular we show that two-bit operations characterized by 4 × 4 matrices in which the sixteen entries obey a set of five polynomial relations can be composed according to certain rules to yield a class of circuits that can be simulated classically in polynomial time. This contrasts with the known universality of two-bit operations and demonstrates that efficient quantum computation of restricted classes is reconcilable with the Polynomial Time Turing Hypothesis. Therefore, it is possible that, The techniques introduced bring the quantum computational model within the realm of algebraic complexity theory. In a manner consistent with one view of quantum physics, the wave function is simulated deterministically, and randomization arises only in the course of making measurements. The results generalize the quantum model in that they do not require the matrices to be unitary. In a different direction these techniques also yield deterministic polynomial time algorithms for the decision and parity problems for certain classes of read-twice Boolean formulae. All our results are based on the use of gates that are defined in terms of their graph matching properties.
Efficiently uploading data into quantum states is essential for many quantum algorithms to achieve advantage across various applications. In this paper, we address this challenge by developing a method to upload a polynomial function f ( x ) on the interval x ∈ [ − 1 , 1 ] into a pure quantum state consisting of qubits, where a discretized f ( x ) is the amplitude of this state. The preparation cost has O ( n log n ) scaling in the number of qubits n and linear scaling with the degree of the polynomial Q . This efficiency allows the preparation of states whose amplitudes correspond to high-degree polynomials (up to 10 4 ), enabling accurate approximation of functions that admit efficient polynomial series representations and whose amplitude profiles are not extremely localized. We provide a fully explicit circuit realization, based on four real polynomials that meet specific parity and boundedness conditions. We extend this construction to cover piecewise polynomial functions, a case not previously addressed explicitly in the literature, the algorithm scaling linearly with the number of piecewise parts. Our method achieves efficient quantum circuit implementation and we present detailed gate counting and resource analysis.