Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

On the Hardness of Learning With Errors with Binary Secrets.

Daniele Micciancio

Published Jan 1, 2018• 4 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Estimation of the Hardness of the Learning with Errors Problem with a Restricted Number of Samples.

Markus Schmidt, Nina Bindel

•Jan 1, 2017•7 citations

On the Hardness of Module Learning with Errors with Short Distributions

Katharina Boudgoust, Corentin Jeudy, Adeline Roux-Langlois +1 more

The Module Learning With Errors ( $$\text {M-LWE}$$ ) problem is a core computational assumption of lattice-based cryptography which offers an interesting trade-off between guaranteed security and concrete efficiency. The problem is parameterized by a secret distribution as well as an error distribution. There is a gap between the choices of those distributions for theoretical hardness results (standard formulation of $$\text {M-LWE}$$ , i.e., uniform secret modulo q and Gaussian error) and practical schemes (small bounded secret and error). In this work, we make progress toward narrowing this gap. More precisely, we prove that $$\text {M-LWE}$$ with uniform $$\eta $$ -bounded secret for any $$1 \le \eta \ll q$$ and Gaussian error, in both its search and decision variants, is at least as hard as the standard formulation of $$\text {M-LWE}$$ , provided that the module rank d is at least logarithmic in the ring degree n. We also prove that the search version of $$\text {M-LWE}$$ with large uniform secret and uniform $$\eta $$ -bounded error is at least as hard as the standard $$\text {M-LWE}$$ problem, if the number of samples m is close to the module rank d and with further restrictions on $$\eta $$ . The latter result can be extended to provide the hardness of search $$\text {M-LWE}$$ with uniform $$\eta $$ -bounded secret and error under specific parameter conditions. Overall, the results apply to all cyclotomic fields, but most of the intermediate results are proven in more general number fields.

Journal of Cryptology•Nov 30, 2022•36 citations

Some algorithms for learning with errors

Robert Fitzpatrick

•Jan 1, 2014•1 citation

QUBO Modeling of Module Learning With Errors: Stability and Scaling in Post-Quantum Cryptography

Ruturaj Khamitkar, Durga Pritam Suggisetti, Soujanya Chatti +2 more

Lattice-based post-quantum cryptography relies on the hardness of the Learning With Errors (LWE) and Module Learning With Errors (MLWE) problems. This work introduces a constructive framework for encoding small MLWE instances as Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) models suitable for quantum annealing. The formulation jointly represents secret coefficients and explicit error variables within a unified binary optimization structure, enabling their simultaneous recovery from the ground-state solution. Beyond the encoding, we develop a stability analysis of the resulting optimization landscape under additive perturbations. We show that the admissible noise region forms a convex polytope defined by competing candidate secrets, and establish an equivalent characterization in terms of the QUBO energy gap between the optimal and second-best solutions. Numerical experiments on low-dimensional benchmark instances using exact simulation demonstrate correct recovery of both secret and discretized error vectors, and confirm consistency between geometric stability regions and energy-gap behavior. We further quantify the scaling of logical variables and embedding overhead with increasing MLWE dimensions to assess feasibility on quantum annealing architectures. The results establish a systematic connection between MLWE problems and quantum optimization while providing a framework for analyzing robustness properties of QUBO formulations. Although current quantum annealing hardware remains insufficient for cryptographically relevant parameters, the proposed methodology offers a structured basis for studying lattice-based problems in quantum optimization settings without implying a practical threat to standardized post-quantum schemes.

quant-pharXiv:2607.05973•Jul 8, 2026•0 citations

Provable Dual Attacks on Learning with Errors

Amaury Pouly, Yixin Shen

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2024•20 citations

Lossy Codes and a New Variant of the Learning-With-Errors Problem

Nico Döttling, Jörn Müller‐Quade

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2013•48 citations
The Module Learning With Errors ( M-LWE\text {M-LWE}M-LWE ) problem is a core computational assumption of lattice-based cryptography which offers an interesting trade-off between guaranteed security and concrete efficiency. The problem is parameterized by a secret distribution as well as an error distribution. There is a gap between the choices of those distributions for theoretical hardness results (standard formulation of M-LWE\text {M-LWE}M-LWE , i.e., uniform secret modulo q and Gaussian error) and practical schemes (small bounded secret and error). In this work, we make progress toward narrowing this gap. More precisely, we prove that M-LWE\text {M-LWE}M-LWE with uniform η\eta η -bounded secret for any 1≤η≪q1 \le \eta \ll q1≤η≪q and Gaussian error, in both its search and decision variants, is at least as hard as the standard formulation of M-LWE\text {M-LWE}M-LWE , provided that the module rank d is at least logarithmic in the ring degree n. We also prove that the search version of M-LWE\text {M-LWE}M-LWE with large uniform secret and uniform η\eta η -bounded error is at least as hard as the standard M-LWE\text {M-LWE}M-LWE problem, if the number of samples m is close to the module rank d and with further restrictions on η\eta η . The latter result can be extended to provide the hardness of search M-LWE\text {M-LWE}M-LWE with uniform η\eta η -bounded secret and error under specific parameter conditions. Overall, the results apply to all cyclotomic fields, but most of the intermediate results are proven in more general number fields.
Lattice-based post-quantum cryptography relies on the hardness of the Learning With Errors (LWE) and Module Learning With Errors (MLWE) problems. This work introduces a constructive framework for encoding small MLWE instances as Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) models suitable for quantum annealing. The formulation jointly represents secret coefficients and explicit error variables within a unified binary optimization structure, enabling their simultaneous recovery from the ground-state solution. Beyond the encoding, we develop a stability analysis of the resulting optimization landscape under additive perturbations. We show that the admissible noise region forms a convex polytope defined by competing candidate secrets, and establish an equivalent characterization in terms of the QUBO energy gap between the optimal and second-best solutions. Numerical experiments on low-dimensional benchmark instances using exact simulation demonstrate correct recovery of both secret and discretized error vectors, and confirm consistency between geometric stability regions and energy-gap behavior. We further quantify the scaling of logical variables and embedding overhead with increasing MLWE dimensions to assess feasibility on quantum annealing architectures. The results establish a systematic connection between MLWE problems and quantum optimization while providing a framework for analyzing robustness properties of QUBO formulations. Although current quantum annealing hardware remains insufficient for cryptographically relevant parameters, the proposed methodology offers a structured basis for studying lattice-based problems in quantum optimization settings without implying a practical threat to standardized post-quantum schemes.