A Little Honesty Goes a Long Way: The Two-Tier Model for Secure Multiparty Computation.

Juan A. Garay, Ran Gelles, David Johnson, Aggelos Kiayias, Moti M. Yung

Published Jan 1, 2014• 1 citation

Abstract

Abstract. Secure multiparty computation (MPC) as a service is becoming a tangible reality. In such a service, a population of clients wish to utilize a set of servers to delegate privately and reliably a given computation on their inputs. MPC protocols have a number of desired properties including tolerating active misbehavior by some of the servers and guaranteed output delivery. A fundamental result is that in order to achieve the above, an honest majority among servers is necessary. There are settings, however, where this condition might be overly restrictive, making it important to investigate models where this impossibility result can be circumvented, allowing secure computation to be performed even when the number of malicious participants outweighs the number of honest participants. To this end, we introduce the two-tier model for MPC, where a set of m parties that are guaranteed to be honest (the first tier) remains “hidden ” within a set of n − m servers which are of dubious trustworthiness (the second tier), and where the objective is to perform MPC withstanding a number of active misbehaviors that is larger than m/2. Indeed, assuming αn of the second-tier servers are dishonest (where α ∈ (0, 1)), we present an MPC protocol that can withstand up to (1 − )(1 − α)n/2 additional faults, for any > 0 and m = ω(logn). Somewhat surprisingly, this allows the total number of faulty parties to exceed n/2 across both tiers. We demonstrate that the two-tier model naturally arises in various settings, as in the case, for example, of a resource-constrained service provider wishing to utilize a pre-existing set of servers. 1

Related papers

Secure Computation with Partial Message Loss

Chiu‐Yuen Koo

Abstract. Existing communication models for multiparty computation (MPC) either assume that all messages are delivered eventually or any message can be lost. Under the former assumption, MPC protocols guaranteeing output delivery are known. However, this assumption may not hold in some network settings like the Internet where messages can be lost due to denial of service attack or heavy network congestion. On the other hand, the latter assumption may be too conservative. Known MPC protocols developed under this assumption have an undesirable feature: output delivery is not guaranteed even only one party suffers message loss. In this work, we propose a communication model which makes an intermediate assumption on message delivery. In our model, there is a common global clock and three types of parties: (i) Corrupted parties (ii) Honest parties with connection problems (where message delivery is never guaranteed) (iii) Honest parties that can normally communicate but may lose a small fraction of messages at each round due to transient network problems. We define secure MPC under this model. Output delivery is guaranteed to type (ii) parties that do not abort and type (iii) parties. Let n be the total number of parties, ef and ec be upper bounds on the number of corrupted parties and type (ii) parties respectively. We construct a secure MPC protocol for n> 4ef + 3ec. Protocols for broadcast and verifiable secret sharing are constructed along the way. 1

Feb 6, 20080 citations

A New Paradigm for Server-Aided MPC

Alessandra Scafuro, Tanner Verber

The server-aided model for multiparty computation (MPC) was introduced to capture a real-world scenario where clients wish to off-load the heavy computation of MPC protocols to dedicated servers. A rich body of work has studied various trade-offs between security guarantees (e.g., semi-honest vs malicious), trust assumptions (e.g., the threshold on corrupted servers), and efficiency. However, all existing works make the assumption that all clients must agree on employing the same servers, and accept the same corruption threshold. In this paper, we challenge this assumption and introduce a new paradigm for server-aided MPC, where each client can choose their own set of servers and their own threshold of corrupted servers. In this new model, the privacy of each client is guaranteed as long as their own threshold is satisfied, regardless of the other servers/clients. We call this paradigm per-party private server-aided MPC to highlight both a security and efficiency guarantee: (1) per-party privacy, which means that each party gets their own privacy guarantees that depend on their own choice of the servers; (2) per-party complexity, which means that each party only needs to communicate with their chosen servers. Our primary contribution is a new theoretical framework for server-aided MPC. We provide two protocols to show feasibility, but leave it as a future work to investigate protocols that focus on concrete efficiency.

IACR Communications in CryptologyJan 13, 20251 citation

On Achieving the “Best of Both Worlds” in Secure Multiparty Computation

Yuval Ishai, Jonathan I. Katz, Eyal Kushilevitz Z +2 more

Two settings are traditionally considered for secure multiparty computation, depending on whether or not a majority of the parties are assumed to be honest. Existing protocols that assume an honest majority provide “full security” (and, in particular, guarantee output delivery and fairness) when this assumption holds, but are completely insecure if this assumption is violated. On the other hand, known protocols tolerating an arbitrary number of corruptions do not guarantee fairness or output delivery even if only a single party is dishonest. It is natural to wonder whether it is possible to achieve the “best of both worlds”: namely, a single protocol that simultaneously achieves the best possible security in both the above settings. Here, we rule out this possibility (at least for general functionalities) and show some positive results regarding what can be achieved.

SIAM Journal on ComputingJan 1, 201132 citations

Outsourcing Multi-Party Computation.

Seny Kamara, Payman Mohassel, Mariana Raykova

We initiate the study of secure multi-party computation (MPC) in a server-aided setting, where the parties have access to a single server that (1) does not have any input to the computation; (2) does not receive any output from the computation; but (3) has a vast (but bounded) amount of computational resources. In this setting, we are concerned with designing protocols that minimize the computation of the parties at the expense of the server. We develop new definitions of security for this server-aided setting that generalize the standard simulation-based definitions for MPC and allow us to formally capture the existence of dishonest but non-colluding participants. This requires us to introduce a formal characterization of non-colluding adversaries that may be of independent interest. We then design general and special-purpose server-aided MPC protocols that are more efficient (in terms of computation and communication) for the parties than the alternative of running a standard MPC protocol (i.e., without the server). Our main general-purpose protocol provides security when there is at least one honest party with input. We also construct a new and efficient server-aided protocol for private set intersection and give a general transformation from any secure delegated computation scheme to a server-aided two-party protocol. ∗Microsoft Research. senyk@microsoft.com. †University of Calgary. pmohassel@cspc.ucalgary.ca. Work done while visiting Microsoft Research. ‡Columbia University. mariana@cs.columbia.edu. Work done as an intern at Microsoft Research.

May 1, 2011179 citations

Foundations of Secure Computation: Perfect Security and Fairness

Gilad Asharov

In the setting of secure multiparty computation, several distrustful parties wish to carry out a distributed computing task on their local private data while satisfying several security properties such as correctness, privacy, independence of inputs and fairness. The aim of secure multiparty computation (MPC) is to enable the parties to carry out the computation in a secure manner, eliminating any attempt of an adversarial entity to harm the execution. The concept of secure computation is very general and fundamental in cryptography, and models any distributed computing task, including simple computations as coin-tossing and broadcast, as well as more complex tasks such as electronic auctions and anonymous transactions. In this thesis, we study two foundational aspects of secure computation: perfect security and fairness. In the first part of this thesis, we study perfect security in secure computation. A protocol that is perfectly secure cannot be broken even when the adversary has unlimited computational power and its security holds unconditionally. One of the most fundamental results of secure computation was presented by Ben-Or, Goldwasser and Wigderson (BGW) in 1988. They demonstrated that any n-party functionality can be computed with perfect security, in the private channels model. When the adversary is semi-honest this holds as long as t < n/2 parties are corrupted, and when the adversary is malicious this holds as long as t < n/3 parties are corrupted. Unfortunately, a full proof of these results was never published. In this thesis, we remedy this situation and provide a full proof of security of the BGW protocol. This also includes a full description of the protocol for the malicious setting. In addition to the above, we observe that by some simple and natural modifications, the BGW protocol can be significantly simplified and one of its expensive (and perhaps most complicated) subprotocols can be saved. We present a new multiplication protocol that is based on the original construction, but is simpler and achieves higher efficiency. In the second part of this thesis, we study fairness in secure two party computation. Informally, the fairness property guarantees that if one party receives its output, then the other party does too. The well-known impossibility result of Cleve (STOC 1986) implies that, in general, it is impossible to securely compute a function with complete fairness without an honest majority. Until recently, the accepted belief has been that nothing non-trivial can be computed with complete fairness in the two party setting. The surprising work of Gordon, Hazay, Katz and Lindell (STOC 2008) shows that this belief is false, and that there exist some non-trivial (deterministic, finite-domain) Boolean functions that can be computed fairly. This raises the fundamental question of characterizing complete fairness in secure two-party computation. We focus on this question and give both positive and negative results. We first characterize

Jan 1, 20140 citations

On Achieving the "Best of Both Worlds" in Secure Multiparty Computation.

Yuval Ishai, Jonathan I. Katz, Eyal Kushilevitz Z +2 more

Two settings are traditionally considered for secure multiparty computation, depending on whether or not a majority of the parties are assumed to be honest. Protocols designed under this assumption provide “full security ” (and, in particular, guarantee output delivery and fairness) when this assumption holds; unfortunately, these protocols are completely insecure if this assumption is violated. On the other hand, protocols tolerating an arbitrary number of corruptions do not guarantee fairness or output delivery even if only a single party is dishonest. It is natural to wonder whether it is possible to achieve the “best of both worlds”: namely, a single protocol that simultaneously achieves the best possible security in both the above settings. Here, we rule out this possibility (at least for general functionalities) but show some positive results regarding what can be achieved.

Jan 1, 20060 citations