Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

The Algebraic Formulation

Valter Moretti

Published Jan 1, 2019• 4 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-18346-2_8

Related papers

SU(1,1) Lie algebraic approach to linear dissipative processes in quantum optics

Masashi Ban

An SU(1,1) Lie algebraic formulation is presented for investigating the linear dissipative processes in quantum optical systems. The Liouville space formulation, thermo field dynamics, and the disentanglement theorem of SU(1,1) Lie algebra play essential roles in this formulation. In the Liouville space, the time-evolution equation for the state vector of a system is solved algebraically by using the decomposition formulas of SU(1,1) Lie algebra and the thermal state condition of thermo field dynamics. The presented formulation is used for investigating a dissipative nonlinear oscillator, the quantum mechanical model of phase modulation, and the photon echo in the localized electron–phonon system. This algebraic formulation gives a systematic treatment for investigating the phenomena in quantum optical systems.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Sep 1, 1992•68 citations

Mathematical formulation

Martin Pieper

Essentials•Jan 1, 2021•2 citations

Is the C*-Algebraic Approach to Quantum Mechanics an Alternative Formulation to the Dominant One?

Antonino Drago

Since 1947 a foundation of Quantum Mechanics (QM) on functional analysis was suggested by Segal. By defining the C*-algebra of the observables, then the Gelfand-Naimark-Segal theorem faithfully represents this algebra into Hilbert space. In the 70’s Emch has reiterated this formulation and improved it. Recently Strocchi improved it even more. First, he suggested an axiomatization of the paradigmatic Dirac-von Neumann’s formulation of QM to which he addresses two basic criticisms, i.e. a weak linkage with the experimental basis of theoretical physics and the obscurity about the separation mark between classical mechanics and QM. Afterwards, through an analysis of the experimental basis of a physical theory he suggests an explanation of Segal’s restriction of the operators to be bounded. Eventually, he represents this algebra into Hilbert space and at last, by means of Weyl algebra he obtains the symmetries of the dynamics of a particle theory. In fact, several characteristic features of this formulation correspond to those determined by the two choices which are the alternative ones to the choices of the dominant formulation. It is a problem-based theory, since it starts rather from than axioms a problem (i.e. the indeterminacy); then, it argues through both doubly negated propositions and an ad absurdum proof. Moreover, its theoretical development is similar to that of an alternative classical theory since it put, before the geometry, the algebra; the bounded operators are represented by a polynomial algebra; which pertains to constructive mathematics. Eventually, he obtains the symmetries of the theory. The problems to be overcome in order to accurately re-construct his formulation according to the two alternative choices which are listed. It is concluded that rather an alternative role, it plays a complementary role to the paradigmatic formulation.

Advances in Historical Studies•Jan 1, 2018•1 citation

The Basic Formalism

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Feb 1, 2022•0 citations

On a Jordan-algebraic formulation of quantum mechanics: Hilbert space construction

Wolfgang Bischoff

In this note I discuss some aspects of a formulation of quantum mechanics based entirely on the Jordan algebra of observables. After reviewing some facts of the formulation in the \CS -approach I present a Jordan-algebraic Hilbert space construction (inspired by the usual GNS-construction), thereby obtaining a real Hilbert space and a (Jordan-) representation of the algebra of observables on this space. Taking the usual case as a guideline I subsequently derive a Schrödinger equation on this Hilbert space.

arXiv:hep-th/9304124•Apr 26, 1993•6 citations

Theoretical Basis

Dongfen Li

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2025•1 citation
An SU(1,1) Lie algebraic formulation is presented for investigating the linear dissipative processes in quantum optical systems. The Liouville space formulation, thermo field dynamics, and the disentanglement theorem of SU(1,1) Lie algebra play essential roles in this formulation. In the Liouville space, the time-evolution equation for the state vector of a system is solved algebraically by using the decomposition formulas of SU(1,1) Lie algebra and the thermal state condition of thermo field dynamics. The presented formulation is used for investigating a dissipative nonlinear oscillator, the quantum mechanical model of phase modulation, and the photon echo in the localized electron–phonon system. This algebraic formulation gives a systematic treatment for investigating the phenomena in quantum optical systems.
Since 1947 a foundation of Quantum Mechanics (QM) on functional analysis was suggested by Segal. By defining the C*-algebra of the observables, then the Gelfand-Naimark-Segal theorem faithfully represents this algebra into Hilbert space. In the 70’s Emch has reiterated this formulation and improved it. Recently Strocchi improved it even more. First, he suggested an axiomatization of the paradigmatic Dirac-von Neumann’s formulation of QM to which he addresses two basic criticisms, i.e. a weak linkage with the experimental basis of theoretical physics and the obscurity about the separation mark between classical mechanics and QM. Afterwards, through an analysis of the experimental basis of a physical theory he suggests an explanation of Segal’s restriction of the operators to be bounded. Eventually, he represents this algebra into Hilbert space and at last, by means of Weyl algebra he obtains the symmetries of the dynamics of a particle theory. In fact, several characteristic features of this formulation correspond to those determined by the two choices which are the alternative ones to the choices of the dominant formulation. It is a problem-based theory, since it starts rather from than axioms a problem (i.e. the indeterminacy); then, it argues through both doubly negated propositions and an ad absurdum proof. Moreover, its theoretical development is similar to that of an alternative classical theory since it put, before the geometry, the algebra; the bounded operators are represented by a polynomial algebra; which pertains to constructive mathematics. Eventually, he obtains the symmetries of the theory. The problems to be overcome in order to accurately re-construct his formulation according to the two alternative choices which are listed. It is concluded that rather an alternative role, it plays a complementary role to the paradigmatic formulation.
In this note I discuss some aspects of a formulation of quantum mechanics based entirely on the Jordan algebra of observables. After reviewing some facts of the formulation in the \CS -approach I present a Jordan-algebraic Hilbert space construction (inspired by the usual GNS-construction), thereby obtaining a real Hilbert space and a (Jordan-) representation of the algebra of observables on this space. Taking the usual case as a guideline I subsequently derive a Schrödinger equation on this Hilbert space.