We present a detailed report on the decoherence of quantum states of continuous variable systems under the action of a quantum optical master equation resulting from the interaction with general Gaussian uncorrelated environments. The rate of decoherence is quantified by relating it to the decay rates of various, complementary measures of the quantum nature of a state, such as the purity, some non-classicality indicators in phase space, and, for two-mode states, entanglement measures and total correlations between the modes. Different sets of physically relevant initial configurations are considered, including one- and two-mode Gaussian states, number states, and coherent superpositions. Our analysis shows that, generally, the use of initially squeezed configurations does not help to preserve the coherence of Gaussian states, whereas it can be effective in protecting coherent superpositions of both number states and Gaussian wavepackets.
We present a detailed report on the decoherence of quantum states of continuous variable systems under the action of a quantum optical master equation resulting from the interaction with general Gaussian uncorrelated environments. The rate of decoherence is quantified by relating it to the decay rates of various, complementary measures of the quantum nature of a state, such as the purity, some non-classicality indicators in phase space, and, for two-mode states, entanglement measures and total correlations between the modes. Different sets of physically relevant initial configurations are considered, including one- and two-mode Gaussian states, number states, and coherent superpositions. Our analysis shows that, generally, the use of initially squeezed configurations does not help to preserve the coherence of Gaussian states, whereas it can be effective in protecting coherent superpositions of both number states and Gaussian wavepackets.
We present a detailed report on the decoherence of quantum states of continuous variable systems under the action of a quantum optical master equation resulting from the interaction with general Gaussian uncorrelated environments. The rate of decoherence is quantified by relating it to the decay rates of various, complementary measures of the quantum nature of a state, such as the purity, some non-classicality indicators in phase space, and, for two-mode states, entanglement measures and total correlations between the modes. Different sets of physically relevant initial configurations are considered, including one- and two-mode Gaussian states, number states, and coherent superpositions. Our analysis shows that, generally, the use of initially squeezed configurations does not help to preserve the coherence of Gaussian states, whereas it can be effective in protecting coherent superpositions of both number states and Gaussian wavepackets.
Quantum continuous variable systems are quantum systems obeying the canonical commutation relations. As we have seen in the previous chapter, such systems always require the adoption of infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces, even when a finite number of degrees of freedom is considered. Besides making their dynamics potentially intractable, this fact also implies that the study of properties related to the information and correlation content of continuous variable systems turns out to be particularly difficult. A widely known way to make continuous variable systems more tractable is to consider the restriction to Gaussian states. Already well trodden in older research on quantum optics, the study of Gaussian systems has more recently become a central theme of continuous variable quantum information. If open quantum systems, coupled to an external environment, are considered, the Gaussian regime applies when the system couples linearly to its environment and when system and environment are governed by Hamiltonians which are at most quadratic in the canonical operators (or, equivalently, when the overall Hamiltonian of system and environment is at most quadratic). These conditions may seem rather restrictive but, as we shall point out in the course of the book, are actually ordinarily met by a vast number of existing experimental set-ups in the areas of quantum optics, trapped ions, optomechanics, atomic ensembles and certain superconducting degrees of freedom (all of these platforms are reviewed in Chapter 9 ). What we will refer to as Gaussian measurements – POVMs that preserve the Gaussian character of initial states – are also customarily carried out with comparatively high efficiency, while the description of quantum noise can be incorporated seamlessly into the Gaussian picture. What is perhaps even more important to note is that the restriction to the Gaussian realm, while not exhaustive of the full wealth of dynamics and situations allowed in the whole Hilbert space, still lets one include most of the processes relevant to quantum technologies. Squeezing, whereby certain canonical quadratures have uncertainties below the vacuum state noise, and can hence be used in precision measurements, quantum entanglement, and cooling, where the entropy is drained out of a system in order to reach a pure quantum state and thus initialise information protocols or low noise experiments, may all be described within the Gaussian regime. Within the quantum information discourse, the Gaussian restriction has been often criticised on the grounds that no real genuinely quantum effects can ever be observed without leaving it at some point, since the statistics obtained from Gaussian states through Gaussian measurements can be reproduced by classical probability distributions. While technically correct, the reader should be reminded that such critiques often disregard the fact that the object described by a Gaussian state does entail a genuinely quantum description in a Hilbert space. Hence, for instance, the preparation of a pure Gaussian quantum state is the preparation of a pure vector of the Hilbert space. Likewise, a highly squeezed Gaussian state prepared for a metrological protocol is a state with very low noise in a certain physical observable, regardless of whether it can be mimicked by a classical distribution or not. The testing and exploitation of quantum non-locality (stronger than classical correlations that imply the presence of quantum entanglement) with Gaussian states does instead require a departure from Gaussian measurements. However, as we will see, certain non-Gaussian measurements are customarily implemented with current technology, and it is hence still relevant to study in detail the creation of such a resource for Gaussian states. This chapter will introduce Gaussian states from a somewhat unusual angle: as ground and thermal states of at most second-order Hamiltonians. Our treatment will highlight the privileged role played by quadratic canonical ( i.e. , ‘symplectic’) transformations in this context, which we will take care to describe in full generality, and will hinge on the reduction of Gaussian states into their normal modes, which allows for their systematic diagonalisation. We will then proceed to explore an equivalent characterisation in terms of statistical moments of the canonical operators, and to introduce the implications of non-commutativity on such statistics in the form of the Robertson–Schrödinger uncertainty relation.
We study the evolution of purity, entanglement, and total correlations of general two-mode continuous variable Gaussian states in arbitrary uncorrelated Gaussian environments. The time evolution of purity, von Neumann entropy, logarithmic negativity, and mutual information is analyzed for a wide range of initial conditions. In general, we find that a local squeezing of the bath leads to a faster degradation of purity and entanglement, while it can help to preserve the mutual information between the modes.
The characterisation of quantum correlations, also known as entanglement, is central to quantum information theory. Operationally, entanglement gives rise to the notion of quantum non-locality, which challenges the ‘reality’ of quantum mechanics (adopting the terminology of Einstein, Podolski and Rosen) and arguably represents its most distinctive feature, in the sense that it calls for a departure from certain foundational tenets of classical physics. It should thus not come as a surprise that entanglement turns out to be a key resource for the implementation of a number of quantum communication protocols and also necessary to achieve computational speed-ups with quantum hardware, in the sense that accessing regions of the Hilbert space with entangled states allows one to shorten the computational depth of certain algorithms. Not surprisingly, generating and maintaining entanglement is generally difficult in practice, as it requires strong interactions between selected components of a system that must at the same time be isolated from the environment. Thanks to the techniques developed in quantum optical set-ups to achieve squeezed light, entanglement is, however, comparatively accessible with optical quantum continuous variables. As we shall see, in fact, continuous variable entanglement is closely related to the notion of squeezing. It is therefore of the utmost importance to be able to qualify and quantify the entanglement of quantum continuous variables, which is the subject matter of the present chapter. The first part of the chapter is devoted to techniques and criteria based on second moments to detect the entanglement of Gaussian states and also to the description of possible ways to quantify such quantum correlations, bearing in mind that the determination of entanglement monotones of clear operational significance is still an open problem, even in the restricted arena of Gaussian states. Although the criteria based on second moments are sufficient, but not necessary, for the detection of non-Gaussian entanglement too, we will push our analysis further by introducing more general criteria based on higher order statistical moments, which will be put to use to detect, on paper, the quantum correlations of an entangled cat-like state. We will also address the issues of entanglement distillation and quantum non-locality tests, in whose contexts we shall encounter other non-Gaussian operations and states, such as photon-subtracted states.
We address measurement-based generation of quantum coherence in continuous variable systems. We consider Gaussian measurements performed on Gaussian states and focus on two scenarios: In the first one, we assume an initially correlated bipartite state shared by two parties and study how correlations may be exploited to remotely create quantum coherence via measurement back action. In particular, we focus on conditional states with zero first moments, so as to address coherence due to properties of the covariance matrix. We consider different classes of bipartite states with incoherent marginals and show that the larger the measurement squeezing, the larger the conditional coherence. Homodyne detection is thus the optimal Gaussian measurement to remotely generate coherence. We also show that for squeezed thermal states there exists a threshold value for the generated coherence which separates entangled and separable states at a fixed energy. Finally, we briefly discuss the tripartite case and the relationship between tripartite correlations and the conditional two-mode coherence. In the second scenario, we address the steady-state coherence of a system interacting with an environment which is continuously monitored. In particular, we discuss the dynamics of an optical parametric oscillator in order to investigate how the coherence of a Gaussian state may be increased by means of time-continuous Gaussian measurement on the interacting environment.
The unavoidable interaction of quantum systems with their environment usually results in the loss of desired quantum resources. Suitably chosen system Hamiltonians, however, can, to some extent, counteract such detrimental decay, giving rise to the set of stabilizable states. Here we discuss the possibility to stabilize Gaussian states in continuous-variable systems. We identify necessary and sufficient conditions for such stabilizability and elaborate these on two benchmark examples, a single, damped mode and two locally damped modes. The obtained stabilizability conditions, which are formulated in terms of the states' covariance matrices, are, more generally, also applicable to non-Gaussian states, where they may similarly help to, e.g., discuss entanglement preservation and/or detection up to the second moments.