Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bogoliubov theory for Bose gases interacting through singular potentials

Christian Brennecke

Published Jan 1, 2018• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.5167/uzh-152476

Related papers

Ground state of Bose gases interacting through singular potentials

Lea Boßmann, Nikolai Leopold, Sören Petrat +1 more

Journal of Functional Analysis•Nov 4, 2025•0 citations

Bogoliubov Theory for Ultra Dilute Bose Gases

Christian Brennecke

Springer INdAM series•Jan 1, 2023•0 citations

Suppression of Bogoliubov pairing in interacting Bose gases

David Clément

•Oct 9, 2023•0 citations

Trial States for Bose Gases: Singular Scalings and Non-integrable Potentials

Alessandro Olgiati

Springer INdAM series•Jan 1, 2023•0 citations

Ground state of Bose gases interacting through singular potentials

Lea Boßmann, Nikolai Leopold, Sören Petrat +1 more

We consider a system of $N$ bosons on the three-dimensional unit torus. The particles interact through repulsive pair interactions of the form $N^{3β-1} v (N^βx)$ for $β\in (0,1)$. We prove the next order correction to Bogoliubov theory for the ground state and the ground state energy.

arXiv:2309.12233•Sep 21, 2023•0 citations

Bogoliubov theory for dilute Bose gases: The Gross-Pitaevskii regime

Serena Cenatiempo

In 1947, Bogoliubov suggested a heuristic theory to compute the excitation spectrum of weakly interacting Bose gases. Such a theory predicts a linear excitation spectrum and provides expressions for the thermodynamic functions which are believed to be correct in the dilute limit. Thus far, there are only a few cases where the predictions of Bogoliubov can be obtained by means of rigorous mathematical analysis. A major challenge is to control the corrections beyond Bogoliubov theory, namely, to test the validity of Bogoliubov’s predictions in regimes where the approximations made by Bogoliubov are not valid. In these notes, we discuss how this challenge can be addressed in the case of a system of N interacting bosons trapped in a box with volume one in the Gross-Pitaevskii limit, where the scattering length of the potential is of the order 1/N and N tends to infinity. This is a recent result obtained in Boccato et al. [Commun. Math. Phys. (to be published); preprint arXiv:1812.03086 and Acta Math. 222, 219–335 (2019); e-print arXiv:1801.01389], which extends a previous result obtained in Boccato et al. [Commun. Math. Phys. 359, 975 (2018)], removing the assumption of a small interaction potential.

arXiv:1903.08208•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Aug 1, 2019•6 citations
We consider a system of NNN bosons on the three-dimensional unit torus. The particles interact through repulsive pair interactions of the form N3β−1v(Nβx)N^{3β-1} v (N^βx)N3β−1v(Nβx) for β∈(0,1)β\in (0,1)β∈(0,1). We prove the next order correction to Bogoliubov theory for the ground state and the ground state energy.
In 1947, Bogoliubov suggested a heuristic theory to compute the excitation spectrum of weakly interacting Bose gases. Such a theory predicts a linear excitation spectrum and provides expressions for the thermodynamic functions which are believed to be correct in the dilute limit. Thus far, there are only a few cases where the predictions of Bogoliubov can be obtained by means of rigorous mathematical analysis. A major challenge is to control the corrections beyond Bogoliubov theory, namely, to test the validity of Bogoliubov’s predictions in regimes where the approximations made by Bogoliubov are not valid. In these notes, we discuss how this challenge can be addressed in the case of a system of N interacting bosons trapped in a box with volume one in the Gross-Pitaevskii limit, where the scattering length of the potential is of the order 1/N and N tends to infinity. This is a recent result obtained in Boccato et al. [Commun. Math. Phys. (to be published); preprint arXiv:1812.03086 and Acta Math. 222, 219–335 (2019); e-print arXiv:1801.01389], which extends a previous result obtained in Boccato et al. [Commun. Math. Phys. 359, 975 (2018)], removing the assumption of a small interaction potential.