Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Neurocomputing

Quantum probabilistic associative memory architecture

Fernando M. de Paula Neto, Adenilton José da Silva, Wilson Rosa de Oliveira, Teresa B. Ludermir

Published Apr 24, 2019• 11 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.neucom.2019.03.078

Related papers

Quantum associative memory

Dan A. Ventura

arXiv:quant-ph/9807053•Information Sciences•May 1, 2000•288 citations

Quantum-inspired resonance for associative memory

Michail A. Zak

Chaos Solitons & Fractals•Nov 1, 2008•8 citations

Quantum associative memory with distributed queries

Alexandr Alexandrovich Ezhov, A.V. Nifanova, Dan A. Ventura

Information Sciences•Oct 1, 2000•53 citations

Spectral Characteristics of Quantum Associative Memories

Gerasimos G. Rigatos, Spyros G. Tzafestaş

Springer eBooks•Jun 5, 2007•0 citations

A post-quantum associative memory

Ludovico Lami, Daniel Goldwater, Gerardo Adesso

Abstract Associative memories are devices storing information that can be fully retrieved given partial disclosure of it. We examine a toy model of associative memory and the ultimate limitations to which it is subjected within the framework of general probabilistic theories (GPTs), which represent the most general class of physical theories satisfying some basic operational axioms. We ask ourselves how large the dimension of a GPT should be so that it can accommodate 2 m states with the property that any N of them are perfectly distinguishable. Call d ( N , m ) the minimal such dimension. Invoking an old result by Danzer and Grünbaum, we prove that d ( 2 , m ) = m + 1 , to be compared with O ( 2 m ) when the GPT is required to be either classical or quantum. This yields an example of a task where GPTs outperform both classical and quantum theory exponentially. More generally, we resolve the case of fixed N and asymptotically large m, proving that d ( N , m ) ⩽ m 1 + o N ( 1 ) (as m → ∞ ) for every N ⩾ 2 , which yields again an exponential improvement over classical and quantum theories. Finally, we develop a numerical approach to the general problem of finding the largest N-wise mutually distinguishable set for a given GPT, which can be seen as an instance of the maximum clique problem on N-regular hypergraphs.

arXiv:2201.12305•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Sep 29, 2023•2 citations

Artificial neural networks as quantum associative memory

Kathleen E. Hamilton, Jonathan Schrock, Neena Imam +1 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 13, 2017•0 citations
Abstract Associative memories are devices storing information that can be fully retrieved given partial disclosure of it. We examine a toy model of associative memory and the ultimate limitations to which it is subjected within the framework of general probabilistic theories (GPTs), which represent the most general class of physical theories satisfying some basic operational axioms. We ask ourselves how large the dimension of a GPT should be so that it can accommodate 2 m states with the property that any N of them are perfectly distinguishable. Call d ( N , m ) the minimal such dimension. Invoking an old result by Danzer and Grünbaum, we prove that d ( 2 , m ) = m + 1 , to be compared with O ( 2 m ) when the GPT is required to be either classical or quantum. This yields an example of a task where GPTs outperform both classical and quantum theory exponentially. More generally, we resolve the case of fixed N and asymptotically large m, proving that d ( N , m ) ⩽ m 1 + o N ( 1 ) (as m → ∞ ) for every N ⩾ 2 , which yields again an exponential improvement over classical and quantum theories. Finally, we develop a numerical approach to the general problem of finding the largest N-wise mutually distinguishable set for a given GPT, which can be seen as an instance of the maximum clique problem on N-regular hypergraphs.