Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

CRC Press eBooks

Marginal Fermi Liquids

Vikram Tripathi

Published Feb 2, 2018• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The Landau Fermi liquid theory of metals has been so successful that exceptions to it draw a fair amount of attention. The theory rests on the assumption that the low‐energy properties of interacting electrons in a metal in three dimensions may be described in terms of weakly repulsive charged spin 1 2 $ \frac{1}{2} $ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781351121996/259a876e-1ad1-4598-839f-e9587e88d783/content/inline-math13_1.tif"/> fermionic excitations— the quasiparticles. This is of course not generally expected to hold following a phase transition, for example, in the form of a Pomeranchuk instability or a superconducting transition. In Chapter 2 we showed that Pomeranchuk instabilities occur whenever some Landau F function satisfies the condition F l s ( a ) / ( 2 l + 1 ) = - 1 $ F_{l}^{s(a)} /(2l + 1) = - 1 $ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781351121996/259a876e-1ad1-4598-839f-e9587e88d783/content/inline-math13_2.tif"/> , where l = 0, 1, 2, . . . denotes the relevant angular momentum channel where the instability occurs. The l = 0 instability in the spin‐symmetric channel is associated with a divergence of compressibility that leads to phase separation and consequent breakdown of the Fermi liquid. In the spin‐antisymmetric channel, the l = 0 instability corresponds to ferromagnetism. In the ferromagnetic quantum critical region (“classical” Gaussian regime in Hertz theory), we found in Sec. 9.6.2.3 that spin fluctuations lead to the destruction of the Landau Fermi liquid and this is evident, for example, in the ln ( 1 / T ) $ {\text{ln }}(1/T) $ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781351121996/259a876e-1ad1-4598-839f-e9587e88d783/content/inline-math13_3.tif"/> divergence of the specific heat coefficient γ ( T ) . Proximity to an electronic instability is however not a necessary condition for the breakdown of the Fermi liquid. In Sec. 10.2 we found that transverse electromagnetic fluctuations are only weakly screened by conduction electrons and that results in a γ ( T ) ∼ ln ( 1 / T ) $ \gamma (T) \sim {\text{ln }}(1/T) $ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781351121996/259a876e-1ad1-4598-839f-e9587e88d783/content/inline-math13_4.tif"/> divergence for the specific heat coefficient without needing to be in the vicinity of a ferromagnetic quantum critical point 1 . The lack of screening of such electromagnetic fluctuations is a feature shared with low energy spin fluctuations in the Hertz theory of quantum critical ferromagnets. Another route to non Fermi‐liquid behavior, not reliant on the existence of long‐range interactions, appeared in Sec. 11.4 where we analyzed non‐optimally screened Kondo models. It was found that singularities in properties such as the susceptibility and specific heat coefficient may be expected in the event that residual low‐energy degeneracies associated with spin‐flip scattering with conduction electrons persist down to the lowest temperatures. Finally, weak potential disorder was found to preserve the Fermi liquid (in three dimensions) down to the lowest temperatures (see Chapter 8 ).

DOI
10.1201/9781351121996-13

Related papers

The Landau Theory of the Normal Fermi Liquid

In-Gee Kim

The nonequilibrium theory described in the previous chapters reduces to a particularly simple form for a system of fermions very close to zero temperature. To see this, let us define a “local occupation number” f ( p , ω ; R , T ) $ f(p, \omega ;R, T) $ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781315196596/a397f31e-8107-49bb-8694-b978d38168d6/content/inline-math12_1.tif"/> by writing 12.1 g < ( p , ω ; R , T ) = a ( p , ω ; R , T ) f ( p , ω ; R , T ) $$ g^{ < } (p,~\omega ;R,~T) = a(p,~\omega ;R,~T)f(p,~\omega ;R,~T) $$ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781315196596/a397f31e-8107-49bb-8694-b978d38168d6/content/math12_1.tif"/>

•Mar 14, 2018•0 citations

Angular Momentum

M.S. Rogalski, Stuart B. Palmer

The orbital angular momentum operator has been introduced by Postulate 2 as a vector operator L → ^ = r → × p → ^ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_1_B.tif"/> whose Cartesian components, Eq.(2.18) , correspond to those of the classical observable for a single particle. As a consequence of Postulate 4, the components L ^ x https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_2_B.tif"/> , L ^ y https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_3_B.tif"/> and L ^ z https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_4_B.tif"/> do not commute with one another, Eq.(4.47) , and all commute with L ^ 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_5_B.tif"/> , and this implies that the eigenstates of L → ^ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_6_B.tif"/> are simultaneous eigenfunctions of L ^ 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_7_B.tif"/> and of one component L ^ i https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_8_B.tif"/> , at a time. Similar properties are exhibited by the angular momentum vector operator of a system of particles, which is defined as the vector sum over the individual particle operators: J → ^ = ∑ p L → ^ ( p ) , J ^ 2 = J ^ x 2 + J ^ y 2 + J ^ z 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn8_108_B.tif"/> such that, because the coordinate and momentum operator for two different particles are commuting operators, we have: 8.1 [ J ^ x , J ^ y ] = [ ∑ p L ^ x ( p ) , ∑ q L ^ y ( q ) ] = ∑ p ∑ q [ L ^ x ( p ) , L ^ y ( q ) ] = ∑ p [ L ^ x ( p ) , L ^ y ( q ) ] = i h ∑ p [ L ^ z ( p ) = i h J ^ z https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn8_1_B.tif"/> and similarly: 8.2 [ J ^ y , J ^ z ] = i h J ^ x , [ J ^ z , J ^ x ] = i h J ^ y https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn8_2_B.tif"/>

CRC Press eBooks•Nov 5, 2020•0 citations

Interacting electrons: the Fermi liquid

Alexei M. Tsvelik

It is quite beyond the purpose of this book to give a comprehensive review of the modern theory of metals. I shall touch only on those topics which are related to the mainstream of this course: the problem of strong interactions. As I have noted before, strong interactions can appear as a result of renormalization, and from the aesthetic point of view this is, perhaps, the most interesting case. As we shall see in Part IV, such renormalizations are particularly strong in one-dimensional systems, where practically any interaction leads to quite dramatic effects. Therefore a one-dimensional electron gas neither undergoes a phase transition (this is forbidden due to the low dimensionality), nor behaves like a system of free electrons. On the contrary, in higher dimensions at low temperatures a system of electrons either undergoes a phase transition (superconductivity, magnetic ordering, etc.), or behaves like a free electron gas. When temperatures as low as several degrees became experimentally available, physicists discovered that an enormous amount of experimental data on normal metals can be described by the model where one neglects electron–electron interactions. This apparent miracle was explained by Landau who demonstrated that the interaction pattern drastically simplifies close to the Fermi surface. Provided the system does not undergo a symmetry breaking phase transition, all interactions except forward scattering effectively vanish on the Fermi surface and low-lying excitations carry quantum numbers of electrons. Therefore they are called quasi-particles . The meaning of the word quasi will become clear in a moment.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 20, 2003•0 citations

Singular or Non-Fermi Liquids

C. M. Varma l

An introductory survey of the theoretical ideas and calculations and experimental results which depart from Landau Fermi liquids is presented. The common themes and possible routes to the singularities leading to breakdown of Landau Fermi liquids are categorized following an elementary discussion of the theory. Soluble examples of singular or Non Fermi‐liquids include models of impurities in metals with special symmetries and one‐dimensional interacting fermions. A review of these is followed by a discussion of singular Fermi liquids in a wide variety of experimental situations and theoretical models. These include the effects of low energy collective fluctuations, gauge fields, fluctuations around quantum critical points, the normal state of high temperature superconductors and the two dimensional metallic state.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2002•14 citations

The Landau Theory of the Normal Fermi Liquid

Leo P. Kadanoff, Gordon Baym

The nonequilibrium theory described in the previous chapters reduces to a particularly simple form for a system of fermions very close to zero temperature. To see this, let us define a “local occupation number” f ( p , ω ; R , T) by writing ( 11-1 ) g < ( p , ω ; R , T ) = a ( p , ω ; R , T ) f ( p , ω ; R , T ) https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9780429493218/2723bf93-af84-4d1d-955c-798a77ad6aa2/content/eq713.tif"/>

CRC Press eBooks•Mar 8, 2018•0 citations

Physical prerequisites

In-Gee Kim

The quantum revolution in the beginning of the 20th century changed our concepts of dynamics. The dynamic variables such as position r $ {\mathbf{r}} $ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781315196596/a397f31e-8107-49bb-8694-b978d38168d6/content/inline-math1_1.tif"/> and momentum p $ {\mathbf{p}} $ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781315196596/a397f31e-8107-49bb-8694-b978d38168d6/content/inline-math1_2.tif"/> are replaced by the corresponding position and momentum operators r ^ $ {\hat{\mathbf{r}}} $ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781315196596/a397f31e-8107-49bb-8694-b978d38168d6/content/inline-math1_3.tif"/> and p ^ $ {\hat{\mathbf{p}}} $ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781315196596/a397f31e-8107-49bb-8694-b978d38168d6/content/inline-math1_4.tif"/> , respectively When one would like to observe a dynamical variable, say ω , of a particle, one has to introduce a wavefunction ψ , which contains all the dynamical information of particles, and to apply the corresponding dynamical operator Ω ^ $ \hat{\Omega } $ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781315196596/a397f31e-8107-49bb-8694-b978d38168d6/content/inline-math1_5.tif"/> to the wavefunction ψ . Then one may obtain the desired dynamical value of the particle as the eigenvalue of the operator, 1.1 Ω ^ ψ = ω ψ . $$ \hat{\Omega }\psi = \omega \psi . $$ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781315196596/a397f31e-8107-49bb-8694-b978d38168d6/content/math1_1.tif"/>

•Mar 14, 2018•0 citations
The Landau Fermi liquid theory of metals has been so successful that exceptions to it draw a fair amount of attention. The theory rests on the assumption that the low‐energy properties of interacting electrons in a metal in three dimensions may be described in terms of weakly repulsive charged spin 1 2 12\frac{1}{2}21​ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781351121996/259a876e-1ad1-4598-839f-e9587e88d783/content/inline-math13_1.tif"/> fermionic excitations— the quasiparticles. This is of course not generally expected to hold following a phase transition, for example, in the form of a Pomeranchuk instability or a superconducting transition. In Chapter 2 we showed that Pomeranchuk instabilities occur whenever some Landau F function satisfies the condition F l s ( a ) / ( 2 l + 1 ) = - 1 Fls(a)/(2l+1)=−1F_{l}^{s(a)} /(2l + 1) = - 1Fls(a)​/(2l+1)=−1 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781351121996/259a876e-1ad1-4598-839f-e9587e88d783/content/inline-math13_2.tif"/> , where l = 0, 1, 2, . . . denotes the relevant angular momentum channel where the instability occurs. The l = 0 instability in the spin‐symmetric channel is associated with a divergence of compressibility that leads to phase separation and consequent breakdown of the Fermi liquid. In the spin‐antisymmetric channel, the l = 0 instability corresponds to ferromagnetism. In the ferromagnetic quantum critical region (“classical” Gaussian regime in Hertz theory), we found in Sec. 9.6.2.3 that spin fluctuations lead to the destruction of the Landau Fermi liquid and this is evident, for example, in the ln ( 1 / T ) ln (1/T){\text{ln }}(1/T)ln (1/T) https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781351121996/259a876e-1ad1-4598-839f-e9587e88d783/content/inline-math13_3.tif"/> divergence of the specific heat coefficient γ ( T ) . Proximity to an electronic instability is however not a necessary condition for the breakdown of the Fermi liquid. In Sec. 10.2 we found that transverse electromagnetic fluctuations are only weakly screened by conduction electrons and that results in a γ ( T ) ∼ ln ( 1 / T ) γ(T)∼ln (1/T)\gamma (T) \sim {\text{ln }}(1/T)γ(T)∼ln (1/T) https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781351121996/259a876e-1ad1-4598-839f-e9587e88d783/content/inline-math13_4.tif"/> divergence for the specific heat coefficient without needing to be in the vicinity of a ferromagnetic quantum critical point 1 . The lack of screening of such electromagnetic fluctuations is a feature shared with low energy spin fluctuations in the Hertz theory of quantum critical ferromagnets. Another route to non Fermi‐liquid behavior, not reliant on the existence of long‐range interactions, appeared in Sec. 11.4 where we analyzed non‐optimally screened Kondo models. It was found that singularities in properties such as the susceptibility and specific heat coefficient may be expected in the event that residual low‐energy degeneracies associated with spin‐flip scattering with conduction electrons persist down to the lowest temperatures. Finally, weak potential disorder was found to preserve the Fermi liquid (in three dimensions) down to the lowest temperatures (see Chapter 8 ).
The nonequilibrium theory described in the previous chapters reduces to a particularly simple form for a system of fermions very close to zero temperature. To see this, let us define a “local occupation number” f ( p , ω ; R , T ) $ f(p, \omega ;R, T) $ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781315196596/a397f31e-8107-49bb-8694-b978d38168d6/content/inline-math12_1.tif"/> by writing 12.1 g < ( p , ω ; R , T ) = a ( p , ω ; R , T ) f ( p , ω ; R , T ) g<(p, ω;R, T)=a(p, ω;R, T)f(p, ω;R, T) g^{ < } (p,~\omega ;R,~T) = a(p,~\omega ;R,~T)f(p,~\omega ;R,~T) g<(p, ω;R, T)=a(p, ω;R, T)f(p, ω;R, T) https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781315196596/a397f31e-8107-49bb-8694-b978d38168d6/content/math12_1.tif"/>
The orbital angular momentum operator has been introduced by Postulate 2 as a vector operator L → ^ = r → × p → ^ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_1_B.tif"/> whose Cartesian components, Eq.(2.18) , correspond to those of the classical observable for a single particle. As a consequence of Postulate 4, the components L ^ x https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_2_B.tif"/> , L ^ y https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_3_B.tif"/> and L ^ z https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_4_B.tif"/> do not commute with one another, Eq.(4.47) , and all commute with L ^ 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_5_B.tif"/> , and this implies that the eigenstates of L → ^ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_6_B.tif"/> are simultaneous eigenfunctions of L ^ 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_7_B.tif"/> and of one component L ^ i https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/inline-eqn8_8_B.tif"/> , at a time. Similar properties are exhibited by the angular momentum vector operator of a system of particles, which is defined as the vector sum over the individual particle operators: J → ^ = ∑ p L → ^ ( p ) , J ^ 2 = J ^ x 2 + J ^ y 2 + J ^ z 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn8_108_B.tif"/> such that, because the coordinate and momentum operator for two different particles are commuting operators, we have: 8.1 [ J ^ x , J ^ y ] = [ ∑ p L ^ x ( p ) , ∑ q L ^ y ( q ) ] = ∑ p ∑ q [ L ^ x ( p ) , L ^ y ( q ) ] = ∑ p [ L ^ x ( p ) , L ^ y ( q ) ] = i h ∑ p [ L ^ z ( p ) = i h J ^ z https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn8_1_B.tif"/> and similarly: 8.2 [ J ^ y , J ^ z ] = i h J ^ x , [ J ^ z , J ^ x ] = i h J ^ y https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn8_2_B.tif"/>
It is quite beyond the purpose of this book to give a comprehensive review of the modern theory of metals. I shall touch only on those topics which are related to the mainstream of this course: the problem of strong interactions. As I have noted before, strong interactions can appear as a result of renormalization, and from the aesthetic point of view this is, perhaps, the most interesting case. As we shall see in Part IV, such renormalizations are particularly strong in one-dimensional systems, where practically any interaction leads to quite dramatic effects. Therefore a one-dimensional electron gas neither undergoes a phase transition (this is forbidden due to the low dimensionality), nor behaves like a system of free electrons. On the contrary, in higher dimensions at low temperatures a system of electrons either undergoes a phase transition (superconductivity, magnetic ordering, etc.), or behaves like a free electron gas. When temperatures as low as several degrees became experimentally available, physicists discovered that an enormous amount of experimental data on normal metals can be described by the model where one neglects electron–electron interactions. This apparent miracle was explained by Landau who demonstrated that the interaction pattern drastically simplifies close to the Fermi surface. Provided the system does not undergo a symmetry breaking phase transition, all interactions except forward scattering effectively vanish on the Fermi surface and low-lying excitations carry quantum numbers of electrons. Therefore they are called quasi-particles . The meaning of the word quasi will become clear in a moment.
An introductory survey of the theoretical ideas and calculations and experimental results which depart from Landau Fermi liquids is presented. The common themes and possible routes to the singularities leading to breakdown of Landau Fermi liquids are categorized following an elementary discussion of the theory. Soluble examples of singular or Non Fermi‐liquids include models of impurities in metals with special symmetries and one‐dimensional interacting fermions. A review of these is followed by a discussion of singular Fermi liquids in a wide variety of experimental situations and theoretical models. These include the effects of low energy collective fluctuations, gauge fields, fluctuations around quantum critical points, the normal state of high temperature superconductors and the two dimensional metallic state.
The quantum revolution in the beginning of the 20th century changed our concepts of dynamics. The dynamic variables such as position r $ {\mathbf{r}} $ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781315196596/a397f31e-8107-49bb-8694-b978d38168d6/content/inline-math1_1.tif"/> and momentum p $ {\mathbf{p}} $ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781315196596/a397f31e-8107-49bb-8694-b978d38168d6/content/inline-math1_2.tif"/> are replaced by the corresponding position and momentum operators r ^ $ {\hat{\mathbf{r}}} $ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781315196596/a397f31e-8107-49bb-8694-b978d38168d6/content/inline-math1_3.tif"/> and p ^ $ {\hat{\mathbf{p}}} $ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781315196596/a397f31e-8107-49bb-8694-b978d38168d6/content/inline-math1_4.tif"/> , respectively When one would like to observe a dynamical variable, say ω , of a particle, one has to introduce a wavefunction ψ , which contains all the dynamical information of particles, and to apply the corresponding dynamical operator Ω ^ $ \hat{\Omega } $ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781315196596/a397f31e-8107-49bb-8694-b978d38168d6/content/inline-math1_5.tif"/> to the wavefunction ψ . Then one may obtain the desired dynamical value of the particle as the eigenvalue of the operator, 1.1 Ω ^ ψ = ω ψ . Ω^ψ=ωψ. \hat{\Omega }\psi = \omega \psi . Ω^ψ=ωψ. https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781315196596/a397f31e-8107-49bb-8694-b978d38168d6/content/math1_1.tif"/>