Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

IEICE Technical Report; IEICE Tech. Rep.

A Grouping Method Based on Degree Distribution of Irregular LDPC Codes for Group Shuffled BP Decoding Algorithm

Yoshiyuki Satô, Gou Hosoya, Hirasawa Shigeichi

Published Mar 2, 2009• 1 citation
OpenAlex

Related papers

Studies on Ordered Shuffled BP Decoding of LDPC Codes -- Based on the Loops and Weight Distributions of LDPC Codes

Ryoma Sakai, Matsuo Arisa, Kazuhiko Yamaguchi

IEICE Technical Report; IEICE Tech. Rep.•Feb 28, 2019•0 citations

Research of Density Evolution of LDPC Codes over Rice Channels

Hua Xu, Chengqi Xu

Noise threshold of Low Density Parity Check (LDPC) codes ensemble could be calculated by density evolution of the decoding messages. According to the threshold, performance of the decoding algorithm could be evaluated and degree distribution pairs of irregular LDPC codes also might be optimized. In this paper, for regular LDPC codes on Rice channel, Discrete Density Evolution(DDE) for BP,BP-based and offset BP-based decoding algorithm were compared on different quantization level and step. Furthermore, degree distribution pairs of the irregular LDPC codes were optimized on Rice channel, which was based on DDE for offset BP-based decoding algorithm, the corresponding threshold is also calculated. Finally, the Probability Mass Function (PMF) evolution curve of optimized irregular LDPC codes with code rate 1/2 on Rice channel is given.

JOURNAL OF ELECTRONICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY•Oct 19, 2006•0 citations

Design of irregular LDPC codes with uniform check node Degree distributions

好一 坂庭, KOHICHI SAKANIWA

•Sep 1, 2005•0 citations

New group shuffled BP decoding algorithms for LDPC codes

Chi-Yuan Chang, Yu‐Liang Chen, Chang‐Ming Lee +1 more

Implementing a belief propagation (BP) based LDPC decoder requires high degrees of parallelism using many component soft-in soft-output (SISO) decoding units to perform message passing from variable nodes to check nodes or vice versa. An obvious complexity-reduction solution is to serialize the decoding process, i.e., dividing a decoding iteration into several serial sub-iterations in which a sub-iteration performs only part of the complete parallel message-passing operation. The group horizontal shuffled BP (GHSBP) and vertical shuffled BP (GVSBP) algorithms respectively partition the check and variable nodes of the code graph into groups to perform group-by-group message-passing decoding. This paper proposes new techniques to improve three key elements of a GHSBP decoding algorithm, namely, the grouping method, the decoding schedule and the log-likelihood updating formulae. The (check nodes) grouping method and decoding schedule optimize certain design criterion. The new normalized min-sum updating formula with a self-adjustable correction (scaling) factor offers better nonlinear approximation. Numerical performance of new GHSBP algorithms that include part or all three new techniques indicate that the combination of the proposed grouping and decoding schedule yields a faster convergence rate and our modified min-sum algorithm gives performance superior to that of the conventional min-sum and normalized min-sum algorithm and is very close to that of the sum-product algorithm.

IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)•Jun 1, 2009•4 citations

Minimum Distance Distribution of Irregular LDPC Code Ensembles

健太 笠井, Kenta Kasai

•Aug 1, 2006•0 citations

A Method for Grouping Symbol Nodes of Group Shuffled BP Decoding Algorithm

Y. Sato, Gou Hosoya, Hideki Yagi +1 more

In this paper, we propose a method for enhancing performance of a sequential version of the belief-propagation (BP) decoding algorithm, the group shuffled BP decoding algorithm for low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes. An improved BP decoding algorithm, called the shuffled BP decoding algorithm, decodes each symbol node in serial at each iteration. To reduce the decoding delay of the shuffled BP decoding algorithm, the group shuffled BP decoding algorithm divides all symbol nodes into several groups. In contrast to the original group shuffled BP, which automatically generates groups according to symbol positions, in this paper we propose a method for grouping symbol nodes which generates groups according to the structure of a Tanner graph of the codes. The proposed method can accelerate the convergence of the group shuffled BP algorithm and obtain a lower error rate in a small number of iterations. We show by simulation results that the decoding performance of the proposed method is improved compared with those of the shuffled BP decoding algorithm and the group shuffled BP decoding algorithm.

IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics Communications and Computer Sciences•Oct 1, 2008•1 citation
Noise threshold of Low Density Parity Check (LDPC) codes ensemble could be calculated by density evolution of the decoding messages. According to the threshold, performance of the decoding algorithm could be evaluated and degree distribution pairs of irregular LDPC codes also might be optimized. In this paper, for regular LDPC codes on Rice channel, Discrete Density Evolution(DDE) for BP,BP-based and offset BP-based decoding algorithm were compared on different quantization level and step. Furthermore, degree distribution pairs of the irregular LDPC codes were optimized on Rice channel, which was based on DDE for offset BP-based decoding algorithm, the corresponding threshold is also calculated. Finally, the Probability Mass Function (PMF) evolution curve of optimized irregular LDPC codes with code rate 1/2 on Rice channel is given.
Implementing a belief propagation (BP) based LDPC decoder requires high degrees of parallelism using many component soft-in soft-output (SISO) decoding units to perform message passing from variable nodes to check nodes or vice versa. An obvious complexity-reduction solution is to serialize the decoding process, i.e., dividing a decoding iteration into several serial sub-iterations in which a sub-iteration performs only part of the complete parallel message-passing operation. The group horizontal shuffled BP (GHSBP) and vertical shuffled BP (GVSBP) algorithms respectively partition the check and variable nodes of the code graph into groups to perform group-by-group message-passing decoding. This paper proposes new techniques to improve three key elements of a GHSBP decoding algorithm, namely, the grouping method, the decoding schedule and the log-likelihood updating formulae. The (check nodes) grouping method and decoding schedule optimize certain design criterion. The new normalized min-sum updating formula with a self-adjustable correction (scaling) factor offers better nonlinear approximation. Numerical performance of new GHSBP algorithms that include part or all three new techniques indicate that the combination of the proposed grouping and decoding schedule yields a faster convergence rate and our modified min-sum algorithm gives performance superior to that of the conventional min-sum and normalized min-sum algorithm and is very close to that of the sum-product algorithm.
In this paper, we propose a method for enhancing performance of a sequential version of the belief-propagation (BP) decoding algorithm, the group shuffled BP decoding algorithm for low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes. An improved BP decoding algorithm, called the shuffled BP decoding algorithm, decodes each symbol node in serial at each iteration. To reduce the decoding delay of the shuffled BP decoding algorithm, the group shuffled BP decoding algorithm divides all symbol nodes into several groups. In contrast to the original group shuffled BP, which automatically generates groups according to symbol positions, in this paper we propose a method for grouping symbol nodes which generates groups according to the structure of a Tanner graph of the codes. The proposed method can accelerate the convergence of the group shuffled BP algorithm and obtain a lower error rate in a small number of iterations. We show by simulation results that the decoding performance of the proposed method is improved compared with those of the shuffled BP decoding algorithm and the group shuffled BP decoding algorithm.