The creation of quantum mechanics in the period 1924–1928 restored logical consistency to its rightful place in theoretical physics. The study of interaction between light and electrons provided most of the important clues in the development of the quantum theory. This chapter shows that in the interference experiments the statistical distribution of quanta is correctly given by the intensity of the wave field as computed from classical electromagnetic theory. It also shows that under special circumstances the classical theory also makes contact with some of the empirical facts in Compton's experiment. The chapter discusses a famous example due to W. Heisenberg, in which Compton scattered γ-rays are brought to focus by a microscope. It provides the uncertainty relations for the dynamical variables of a particle from the conservation laws and the properties of photons. Because the motion of charged particles can be deduced from their attendant fields, it is clear that fields cannot be measured to arbitrary precision.
The creation of quantum mechanics in the period 1924–1928 restored logical consistency to its rightful place in theoretical physics. The study of interaction between light and electrons provided most of the important clues in the development of the quantum theory. This chapter shows that in the interference experiments the statistical distribution of quanta is correctly given by the intensity of the wave field as computed from classical electromagnetic theory. It also shows that under special circumstances the classical theory also makes contact with some of the empirical facts in Compton's experiment. The chapter discusses a famous example due to W. Heisenberg, in which Compton scattered γ-rays are brought to focus by a microscope. It provides the uncertainty relations for the dynamical variables of a particle from the conservation laws and the properties of photons. Because the motion of charged particles can be deduced from their attendant fields, it is clear that fields cannot be measured to arbitrary precision.
Chapter I The origins of quantum physics I The Compton effect — a strange dichotomy in the nature of electromagnetic radiation In a series of experiments conducted between 1919 and 1923, Arthur Holly Compton (Figure 1.1) investigated the scattering of monochromatic (single-wavelength) X-rays from graphite targets. He found that the radiation scattered at an angle 0 to the incident beam contained, in addition to radiation of the same wavelength as the incident radiation, a second component with a considerably longer wavelength. The existence of this second component in the scattered radiation could not be explained by the well-established theory of the scattering of electromagnetic waves by electrons. Compton considered instead the process illustrated in Figure 1.2, in which a particle of electromagnetic radiation, collides with a slow moving electron, which then recoils absorbing some of the X-ray particle’s energy. Treating the process as a collision between particles, and using only the (relativistic) conservation laws of energy and momentum, Compton was able to account for the effect completely. However, at the same time, in the same experiment, Compton was using interference effects, depending wholly on the wave model, in order to determine the wavelength of the scattered radiation. So here was an experiment which apparently required the simultaneous use of both the wave and particle models of electromagnetic radiation for the interpretation of the results! The existence of this strange dichotomy in the nature of electromagnetic radiation was just one indication of the need for a radical revision of views regarding the physical world.
This chapter begins with a brief outline of some of the key motivations for considering a quantum theory: the early attempts to determine the spectral distribution of energy density of black bodies; stability of atoms and molecules; specific heats of solids; interference and diffraction of light beams; polarization of photons. The experimental foundations of wave mechanics are then presented in detail, but in a logical order quite different from its historical development: photo-emission of electrons by metallic surfaces, X- and γ-ray scattering from gases, liquids and solids, interference experiments, atomic spectra and the Bohr hypotheses, the experiment of Franck and Hertz, the Bragg experiment, diffraction of electrons by a crystal of nickel (Davisson and Germer), and measurements of position and velocity of an electron. The need for a quantum theory In the second half of the nineteenth century it seemed that the laws of classical mechanics, developed by the genius of Newton, Lagrange, Hamilton, Jacobi and Poincaré, the Maxwell theory of electromagnetic phenomena and the laws of classical statistical mechanics could account for all known physical phenomena. Still, it became gradually clear, after several decades of experimental and theoretical work, that one has to formulate a new kind of mechanics, which reduces to classical mechanics in a suitable limit, and makes it possible to obtain a consistent description of phenomena that cannot be understood within the classical framework. It is now appropriate to present a brief outline of this new class of phenomena, the systematic investigation of which is the object of the following sections and of chapters 4 and 14.
Abstract This chapter examines some crucial experiments and basic principles of quantum mechanics that have strongly influenced the development of quantum theory in its modern form: starting from Planck’s law of black-body radiation and its derivation using the quantization of energy; Einstein’s photon hypothesis for the puzzle presented by the photoelectric effect and its test via the Millikan experiment; the Compton effect; Bohr’s theses for the structure of the hydrogen atom and the complementarity of waves and particles i.e., the wave-particle duality, culminating in de Broglie’s ideas for matter waves and their confirmation in the Davisson-Germer experiment for electron diffraction from a crystal; Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle for position and momentum as well as for energy an time; the famous double-slit experiment and Born’s probability interpretation, and finally the provocative thought experiment of Schrödinger’s cat
Compton scattering figures prominently in the introductory chapters of textbooks on quantum mechanics as providing evidence for the ‘‘particulate’’ nature of light. It also arises in discussions of ‘‘Heisenberg’s microscope,’’ in which it is shown that attempts to measure the position and the momentum of an electron simultaneously are governed by the uncertainty principle. However, recent developments in Compton scattering have not yet found their way into the textbooks. In this paper we review the history of the Compton effect and describe briefly some of the modern developments in x-ray and electron Compton scattering and their application to the study of electron momentum densities which we believe to have a pedagogical value. Finally, we return to Heisenberg’s microscope, and show how it has now become a reality. A complete analysis for all scattering angles depends crucially on the different expressions for the resolution and the depth of focus of the microscope.
Abstract Heisenberg introduced his famous uncertainty relations in a seminal 1927 paper entitled The Physical Content of Quantum Kinematics and Mechanics . He motivated his arguments with a gedanken experiment, a gamma ray microscope to measure the position of a particle. A primary result was that, due to the quantum nature of light, there is an inherent uncertainty in the determinations of the particle’s position and momentum dictated by an indeterminacy relation, δ q δ p ∼ h . Heisenberg offered this demonstration as ‘a direct physical interpretation of the [quantum mechanical] equation pq − qp = − i ℏ ’ but considered the indeterminacy relation to be much more than this. He also argued that it implies limitations on the very meanings of position and momentum and emphasised that these limitations are the source of the statistical character of quantum mechanics. In addition, Heisenberg hoped but was unable to demonstrate that the laws of quantum mechanics could be derived directly from the uncertainty relation. In this paper, we revisit Heisenberg’s microscope and argue that the Schrödinger equation for a free particle does indeed follow from the indeterminacy relation together with reasonable statistical assumptions.
This chapter examines the historical development of quantum mechanics, focusing on key experiments and theories that challenged classical physics. It begins with blackbody radiation, highlighting the discrepancy between classical predictions and experimental observations, leading to Planck's quantization hypothesis, which posits that energy is emitted in discrete packets (quanta). The chapter covers the photoelectric effect and Compton scattering, demonstrating wave–particle duality and validating quantum theory. It also discusses atomic models, culminating in the Bohr model and the energy-level diagram of the hydrogen atom, which explains atomic phenomena such as line spectra and discrete energy transitions. The chapter concludes by introducing the quantum model, which supersedes the Bohr model by incorporating wave–particle duality and the uncertainty principle, highlighting the necessity of quantum mechanics for accurate atomic-scale descriptions.