In this paper, we briefly review the concept of superconducting quantum computers and discuss their hardware architecture. We also describe the necessary technologies for the development of a medium-scale quantum computer with more than tens of thousands of quantum bits.
The superconducting qubit quantum computer is one of the most promising quantum computing architectures for large-scale integration due to its maturity and close proximity to the well-established semiconductor manufacturing infrastructure. From an education perspective, it also bridges classical microwave electronics and quantum electrodynamics. In this paper, we will review the basics of quantum computers, superconductivity, and Josephson junctions. We then introduce important technologies and concepts related to DiVincenzo's criteria, which are the necessary conditions for the superconducting qubits to work as a useful quantum computer. Firstly, we will discuss various types of superconducting qubits formed with Josephson junctions, from which we will understand the trade-off across multiple design parameters, including their noise immunity. Secondly, we will discuss different schemes to achieve entanglement gate operations, which are a major bottleneck in achieving more efficient fault-tolerant quantum computing. Thirdly, we will review readout engineering, including the implementations of the Purcell filters and quantum-limited amplifiers. Finally, we will discuss the nature and review the studies of two-level system defects, which are currently the limiting factor of qubit coherence time. DiVincenzo's criteria are only the necessary conditions for a technology to be eligible for quantum computing. To have a useful quantum computer, large-scale integration is required. We will review proposals and developments for the large-scale integration of superconducting qubit devices. By comparing with the application of electronic design automation (EDA) in semiconductors, we will also review the use of EDA in superconducting qubit quantum computer design, which is necessary for its large-scale integration.
Abstract Superconducting quantum computing has emerged as a leading platform in the pursuit of practical quantum computers, driven by rapid advances from industry, academia, and government initiatives. This review examines the state of superconducting quantum technology, with emphasis on qubit design, processor architecture, scalability, and supporting quantum software. We compare the hardware strategies and performance milestones of key players—including IBM Quantum, Google Quantum AI, Rigetti Computing, Intel Quantum, QuTech, and Oxford Quantum Circuits—highlighting innovations in qubit coherence, control, and system integration. Landmark demonstrations such as quantum supremacy experiments are discussed alongside progress toward real-world applications in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era. Beyond hardware, attention is given to the broader software and service ecosystem, including quantum programming frameworks, operating environments, and cloud-accessible platforms such as Amazon Braket, Azure Quantum, and OriginQ Cloud, which enable remote access and algorithm development. Persistent challenges in superconducting quantum computing—such as error correction, system stability, and large-scale integration—are assessed in light of emerging approaches aimed at fault-tolerant quantum computing. As the field moves from the NISQ era toward fault-tolerant quantum computing, we capture the defining hardware achievements and characteristics of current superconducting processors, while examining the ongoing efforts and challenges in overcoming NISQ-era limitations. These developments offer critical insights into the path toward scalable quantum systems and their transformative impact on future technologies, while also underscoring the strategic and societal considerations that require balancing innovation with responsible oversight and thoughtful governance.
This paper presents a comprehensive review of quantum computing and the technological foundations of quantum processors. Quantum computing represents a transformative computational paradigm that leverages the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics—such as superposition, entanglement, and quantum interference—to solve complex problems that are intractable for classical computers. At the core of this paradigm lies the quantum processor, a specialized hardware system designed to initialize, control, and measure quantum bits (qubits) through precise gate operations and coherent interactions. The survey examines the essential theoretical concepts underlying quantum computation and provides a structured comparison of leading quantum processor platforms. Prominent architectures, including superconducting circuits, trapped-ion systems, and photonic implementations, are analyzed in terms of their physical mechanisms, scalability, coherence properties, and engineering challenges. Each platform offers distinct advantages and faces specific technical limitations related to noise, error correction, and fabrication complexity. In addition to reviewing hardware developments, this study highlights key obstacles in advancing quantum processors toward large-scale, fault-tolerant systems. Issues such as qubit stability, error mitigation, thermal management, and system integration are discussed to present a realistic perspective on current progress. Performance indicators including gate fidelity, coherence time, connectivity, and scalability are used to compare architectural approaches. The objective of this paper is to provide a clear and organized synthesis of recent advancements in quantum computing hardware, thereby offering researchers and practitioners a foundational reference to support continued innovation and development in this rapidly evolving field.
Superconducting qubits are leading candidates in the race to build a quantum computer capable of realizing computations beyond the reach of modern supercomputers. The superconducting qubit modality has been used to demonstrate prototype algorithms in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) technology era, in which non-error-corrected qubits are used to implement quantum simulations and quantum algorithms. With the recent demonstrations of multiple high-fidelity, two-qubit gates as well as operations on logical qubits in extensible superconducting qubit systems, this modality also holds promise for the longer-term goal of building larger-scale error-corrected quantum computers. In this brief review, we discuss several of the recent experimental advances in qubit hardware, gate implementations, readout capabilities, early NISQ algorithm implementations, and quantum error correction using superconducting qubits. Although continued work on many aspects of this technology is certainly necessary, the pace of both conceptual and technical progress in recent years has been impressive, and here we hope to convey the excitement stemming from this progress.
This paper assesses the current state of the quantum computing field with reference to the varied hardware approaches to quantum computing to project the most cost-effective, practical, and long-term solution to quantum computing hardware. While companies and research labs have proven the viability of quantum computing through the construction and operation of intermediate-scale quantum computers, attempts have been unsuccessful at creating scalable, long-term quantum computers with significant capacity to be used in practical applications. While quantum algorithms and applications have already been developed, current quantum computers do not have the necessary hardware capabilities to support running such algorithms. Additionally, the construction of these quantum computers varies drastically, making it difficult to compare and measure quantum computing progress across different hardware architectures. This paper performs a comparative analysis on the four predominant quantum computing hardware architectures to reveal the most sustainable and practical solution based on the criteria of scalability, ease of manufacturing, and energy consumption. These comparisons, along with the shortcomings of each quantum design are discussed to guide further research and development in the field of quantum computing.