Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Advances in Mathematics of Communications

A post-quantum UC-commitment scheme in the global random oracle model from code-based assumptions

Pedro Costa Branco

Published Nov 25, 2019• 2 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In this work, we propose a post-quantum UC-commitment scheme in the Global Random Oracle Model, where only one non-programmable random oracle is available. The security of our proposal is based on two well-established post-quantum hardness assumptions from coding theory: The Syndrome Decoding and the Goppa Distinguisher. We prove that our proposal is perfectly hiding and computationally binding.

DOI
10.3934/amc.2020046

Related papers

Practical UC security with a Global Random Oracle.

Ran Canetti, Abhishek Jain, Alessandra Scafuro

We show that there exist commitment, zero-knowledge and general function evaluation pro-tocols with universally composable security, in a model where all parties and all protocols have access to a single, global, random oracle and no other trusted setup. This model provides sig-nificantly stronger composable security guarantees than the traditional random oracle model of Bellare and Rogaway [CCS’93] or even the common reference string model. Indeed, these latter models provide no security guarantees in the presence of arbitrary protocols that use the same random oracle (or reference string or hash function). Furthermore, our protocols are highly efficient. Specifically, in the interactive setting, our commitment and general computation protocols are much more efficient than the best known ones due to Lindell [Crypto’11,’13] which are secure in the common reference string model. In the non-interactive setting, our protocols are slightly less efficient than the best known ones presented by Afshar et al. [Eurocrypt ’14] but do away with the need to rely on a non-global (programmable) reference string. 1

•Jan 1, 2014•0 citations

A Provably Secure Group Signature Scheme from Code-Based Assumptions.

Martianus Frederic Ezerman, Hyung Tae Lee, San Ling +2 more

Abstract. We solve an open question in code-based cryptography by introducing the first provably secure group signature scheme from code-based assumptions. Specifically, the scheme satisfies the CPA-anonymity and traceability requirements in the random oracle model, assuming the hardness of the McEliece problem, the Learning Parity with Noise prob-lem, and a variant of the Syndrome Decoding problem. Our construction produces smaller key and signature sizes than the existing post-quantum group signature schemes from lattices, as long as the cardinality of the underlying group does not exceed the population of the Netherlands ( ≈ 224 users). The feasibility of the scheme is supported by implementa-tion results. Additionally, the techniques introduced in this work might be of independent interest: a new verifiable encryption protocol for the randomized McEliece encryption and a new approach to design formal security reductions from the Syndrome Decoding problem.

•Jan 1, 2015•0 citations

A New Identification Scheme based on Syndrome Decoding Problem with Provable Security against Quantum Adversaries

Bagus Santoso, Chunhua Su

Recently, in order to guarantee security against quantum adversaries, several identification (ID) schemes based on computational problems which are supposed to be hard even for quantum computers have been proposed. However, their security are only proven against non-quantum adversaries. In this paper, we proposed a novel four-pass code-based identification scheme. By using quantum random oracle model, we provide a security proof for our scheme against quantum adversaries which aim to impersonate the prover under concurrent active attacks, based on the hardness assumption of syndrome decoding (SD) problem. Our security proof is interesting in its own right, since it only requires a non-programmable quantum random oracle, in contrast to existing security proofs of digital signatures generated from ID scheme via Fiat-Shamir transform which require programmable quantum random oracles.

•Apr 7, 2020•0 citations

On unconditionally binding code-based commitment schemes

Kirill Morozov, Partha Sarathi Roy, Kouichi Sakurai

In this work, we construct a dual version of statistically binding commitment scheme by Jain et al. (Asiacrypt 2012) with shorter commitment size under hardness of syndrome decoding. Then, we point out that perfectly binding variants of the above schemes follow directly from the Randomized McEliece and Niederreiter public key encryption schemes, assuming indistinguishability of permuted Goppa codes, as well as hardness of the exact learning parity with noise (xLPN) problem (for the McEliece scheme) and hardness of syndrome decoding (for the Niederreiter scheme). Our key observation here is that perfect binding (as opposed to statistical binding) requires exact knowledge of minimal distance of the underlying code. Finally, we provide security evaluation of our proposals, and compare their performance with that of existing schemes.

International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication (IMCOM)•Jan 5, 2017•7 citations

Randomness Certification from Statistically Hiding Commitments

Ilya Merkulov, Rotem Arnon

Randomness certification aims to guarantee that the output of an untrusted quantum device contains genuine randomness that remains unpredictable even given quantum side information held by an adversary. For a classical verifier interacting with a single quantum device, such a guarantee cannot rely on the physical separation underlying standard Bell tests and must instead follow from computational restrictions on the prover. Building on the framework of Computational Bell Inequalities, we distinguish classical and quantum virtual-input hiding, showing that the former suffices for proofs of quantumness, whereas the latter enables randomness certification against quantum side information. Our main technical contribution is to establish quantum virtual-input hiding for a commitment-based protocol derived from the proof of quantumness from one-way-functions by Morimae and Yamakawa. We show that statistical hiding together with ordinary computational binding against quantum polynomial-time senders suffices, without requiring stronger quantum binding notions such as sum-binding or collapse-binding. This yields a randomness-certification protocol from post-quantum statistically hiding bit commitments. In particular, existing constructions of such commitments from post-quantum one-way permutations imply that post-quantum one-way permutations suffice for randomness certification. We further instantiate our construction using quantum-secure trapdoor claw-free functions, obtaining an efficient classical verifier, and in the quantum random oracle model, obtaining randomness certification without additional computational assumptions but with an inefficient verifier. These instantiations separate the cryptographic properties sufficient for randomness certification from the additional structure required for efficient verification within our commitment-based framework.

quant-pharXiv:2610.25518•Oct 20, 2026•0 citations

A provable secure signature in the quantum random oracle model

Zhen Zhang, Huiyan Chen, Yufan Chen

With the development of quantum computation, quantum computers will break the almost classical cryptography. It is imminent to design post-quantum cryptography algorithm that could resist quantum adversaries. Lattice-based problem has been verified that could resist quantum attacks. Our goal is to design a signature and try to prove it is secure in the quantum random oracle model. Our new signature scheme is redesigned based on the signature proposed by Lyu, but that scheme only proved secure in the random oracle model. The difference between the two signature is that we introduce the middle-product operation. So our signature is based on middle-product LWE hard assumption, which enjoys a security proof from PL WE. Then we combine the secure chameleon hash function and our new scheme, prove that our new combined signature is still secure in the quantum random oracle model.

International Conference on Blockchain Technology and Information Security (ICBCTIS)•Jul 1, 2022•2 citations
In this work, we propose a post-quantum UC-commitment scheme in the Global Random Oracle Model, where only one non-programmable random oracle is available. The security of our proposal is based on two well-established post-quantum hardness assumptions from coding theory: The Syndrome Decoding and the Goppa Distinguisher. We prove that our proposal is perfectly hiding and computationally binding.
We show that there exist commitment, zero-knowledge and general function evaluation pro-tocols with universally composable security, in a model where all parties and all protocols have access to a single, global, random oracle and no other trusted setup. This model provides sig-nificantly stronger composable security guarantees than the traditional random oracle model of Bellare and Rogaway [CCS’93] or even the common reference string model. Indeed, these latter models provide no security guarantees in the presence of arbitrary protocols that use the same random oracle (or reference string or hash function). Furthermore, our protocols are highly efficient. Specifically, in the interactive setting, our commitment and general computation protocols are much more efficient than the best known ones due to Lindell [Crypto’11,’13] which are secure in the common reference string model. In the non-interactive setting, our protocols are slightly less efficient than the best known ones presented by Afshar et al. [Eurocrypt ’14] but do away with the need to rely on a non-global (programmable) reference string. 1
Abstract. We solve an open question in code-based cryptography by introducing the first provably secure group signature scheme from code-based assumptions. Specifically, the scheme satisfies the CPA-anonymity and traceability requirements in the random oracle model, assuming the hardness of the McEliece problem, the Learning Parity with Noise prob-lem, and a variant of the Syndrome Decoding problem. Our construction produces smaller key and signature sizes than the existing post-quantum group signature schemes from lattices, as long as the cardinality of the underlying group does not exceed the population of the Netherlands ( ≈ 224 users). The feasibility of the scheme is supported by implementa-tion results. Additionally, the techniques introduced in this work might be of independent interest: a new verifiable encryption protocol for the randomized McEliece encryption and a new approach to design formal security reductions from the Syndrome Decoding problem.
Recently, in order to guarantee security against quantum adversaries, several identification (ID) schemes based on computational problems which are supposed to be hard even for quantum computers have been proposed. However, their security are only proven against non-quantum adversaries. In this paper, we proposed a novel four-pass code-based identification scheme. By using quantum random oracle model, we provide a security proof for our scheme against quantum adversaries which aim to impersonate the prover under concurrent active attacks, based on the hardness assumption of syndrome decoding (SD) problem. Our security proof is interesting in its own right, since it only requires a non-programmable quantum random oracle, in contrast to existing security proofs of digital signatures generated from ID scheme via Fiat-Shamir transform which require programmable quantum random oracles.
In this work, we construct a dual version of statistically binding commitment scheme by Jain et al. (Asiacrypt 2012) with shorter commitment size under hardness of syndrome decoding. Then, we point out that perfectly binding variants of the above schemes follow directly from the Randomized McEliece and Niederreiter public key encryption schemes, assuming indistinguishability of permuted Goppa codes, as well as hardness of the exact learning parity with noise (xLPN) problem (for the McEliece scheme) and hardness of syndrome decoding (for the Niederreiter scheme). Our key observation here is that perfect binding (as opposed to statistical binding) requires exact knowledge of minimal distance of the underlying code. Finally, we provide security evaluation of our proposals, and compare their performance with that of existing schemes.
Randomness certification aims to guarantee that the output of an untrusted quantum device contains genuine randomness that remains unpredictable even given quantum side information held by an adversary. For a classical verifier interacting with a single quantum device, such a guarantee cannot rely on the physical separation underlying standard Bell tests and must instead follow from computational restrictions on the prover. Building on the framework of Computational Bell Inequalities, we distinguish classical and quantum virtual-input hiding, showing that the former suffices for proofs of quantumness, whereas the latter enables randomness certification against quantum side information. Our main technical contribution is to establish quantum virtual-input hiding for a commitment-based protocol derived from the proof of quantumness from one-way-functions by Morimae and Yamakawa. We show that statistical hiding together with ordinary computational binding against quantum polynomial-time senders suffices, without requiring stronger quantum binding notions such as sum-binding or collapse-binding. This yields a randomness-certification protocol from post-quantum statistically hiding bit commitments. In particular, existing constructions of such commitments from post-quantum one-way permutations imply that post-quantum one-way permutations suffice for randomness certification. We further instantiate our construction using quantum-secure trapdoor claw-free functions, obtaining an efficient classical verifier, and in the quantum random oracle model, obtaining randomness certification without additional computational assumptions but with an inefficient verifier. These instantiations separate the cryptographic properties sufficient for randomness certification from the additional structure required for efficient verification within our commitment-based framework.
With the development of quantum computation, quantum computers will break the almost classical cryptography. It is imminent to design post-quantum cryptography algorithm that could resist quantum adversaries. Lattice-based problem has been verified that could resist quantum attacks. Our goal is to design a signature and try to prove it is secure in the quantum random oracle model. Our new signature scheme is redesigned based on the signature proposed by Lyu, but that scheme only proved secure in the random oracle model. The difference between the two signature is that we introduce the middle-product operation. So our signature is based on middle-product LWE hard assumption, which enjoys a security proof from PL WE. Then we combine the secure chameleon hash function and our new scheme, prove that our new combined signature is still secure in the quantum random oracle model.