The concept of eigenvalues comes from linear algebra rather than quantum mechanics, and came into the latter through the use of linear algebra and matrices. Arnold Sommerfeld felt that Niels Bohr’s atom could only be approximately correct in that it really had only one quantum condition, other than the use of Planck’s model. Paul Dirac had made significant advances in the foundations of quantum mechanics, and particularly in the mathematical basis of the theory, while the Gottingen group was waiting for their paper to appear in print. “In the present theory, the fundamental principles of quantum theory and the principle of conservation of energy follow mathematically from the quantum-mechanical equations.” Paul Ehrenfest was determined to try to calm the water between Bohr and A. Einstein. The rise of the new quantum mechanics had only served to stir up the debate once again, but Ehrenfest would not give up the task.
The concept of eigenvalues comes from linear algebra rather than quantum mechanics, and came into the latter through the use of linear algebra and matrices. Arnold Sommerfeld felt that Niels Bohr’s atom could only be approximately correct in that it really had only one quantum condition, other than the use of Planck’s model. Paul Dirac had made significant advances in the foundations of quantum mechanics, and particularly in the mathematical basis of the theory, while the Gottingen group was waiting for their paper to appear in print. “In the present theory, the fundamental principles of quantum theory and the principle of conservation of energy follow mathematically from the quantum-mechanical equations.” Paul Ehrenfest was determined to try to calm the water between Bohr and A. Einstein. The rise of the new quantum mechanics had only served to stir up the debate once again, but Ehrenfest would not give up the task.
This article discusses the history of quantum physics, beginning with an analysis of the process through which a community of quantum theorists and experimentalists came into being. In particular, it traces the roots and fruits of Max Planck’s papers in irreversible processes in nature. It proceeds by exploring the origin and subsequent development of Niels Bohr’s so-called ‘planetary model’ of the atom, focusing on the extension of the model by Arnold Sommerfeld and members of his school as well to Bohr’s use of his principles of correspondence and adiabatic invariance. It also considers the post-war years, as the problems of atomic spectroscopy sparked the development of new methodological approaches to quantum theory. Finally, it offers a history of the two distinct new forms of quantum mechanics put forward in the mid-1920s: Werner Heisenberg, Max Born, and Pascual Jordan’s matrix mechanics, and Erwin Schrödinger’s wave mechanics.
Toward the end of the nineteenth century, it became clear that some experiments cannot be explained on the basis of known physics, now referred to as classical physics. In 1900, Max Planck was able to correctly describe the distribution of blackbody radiation energy as a function of wavelength λ or frequency ν = c/λ. He had to accept the existence of energy packets (quanta) with energy E = hν. A few years later, Albert Einstein found that this unexpected relation between energy and frequency is also necessary in order to understand photoemission from metallic surfaces. A decade later, Niels Bohr arrived at the correct equation for the electronic spectrum of the hydrogen atom by applying “quantum conditions” on the motion of the electron around the nucleus and the Planck’s relation E = hν on the energy difference between the energy levels (1916). A decade later, Heisenberg, Born, and Jordan introduced “quantum mechanics” and de Broglie and Schrödinger (1925-1926) introduced “wave mechanics.”
Abstract The development of the complex of assumptions and methods now referred to as the “old quantum theory” mainly took place in the first five years following the introduction of the Bohr atomic model in 1913. Three guiding principles emerged that were used, sometimes in overlapping ways, to explain the flood of spectroscopic data that needed to be explained. First, quantization rules (or conditions) were proposed to single out the allowed orbital motions of electrons in atoms. These rules were derived in various forms by Planck, Sommerfeld, and Wilson, but were put into their most general form by Schwarzschild, who recognized the underlying principle as the quantization of the action variables of a multiply periodic classical system. Second, the special role of the action variables in quantization was given convincing support by the transfer of the adiabatic principle of mechanics to quantum theory (work primarily due to Paul Ehrenfest). Third, the correspondence principle, or statement of asymptotic coincidence of quantum and classical theory in the limit of large quantum numbers, originally introduced by Bohr in 1913 as a supporting argument for his quantization of angular momentum in his theory of the hydrogen atom, was extended by Bohr and Kramers to provide selection rules and approximate intensity predictions evening the regime low quantum numbers.
Göttingen and Copenhagen were the undoubted capitals of the new discipline of quantum mechanics. The expertise in experimental and mathematical physics and in pure mathematics made Göttingen the epicentre of the revolution which was taking place in the mathematical physics of quanta. Whilst this was to remain the case for the next few years, other actors soon appeared on the scene who were to contribute to Born's ‘tangle of interconnected alleys’. What was truly remarkable was how quickly the different approaches to the problems of quantum theory were developed and the rapid assimilation of all of them into a coherent and self-consistent theory of quantum mechanics. Whilst the theory itself was completed relatively quickly, the understanding of its physical content was to take many more years. The new players on the scene included Paul Dirac at Cambridge, Erwin Schrödinger in Vienna and Norbert Wiener at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Each of them brought quite new approaches to the development of quantum theory – their innovations were to supersede the matrix mechanics of Born, Heisenberg and Jordan, but there can be no doubt that the success of that theory indicated clearly the route ahead. They were however to involve the introduction of new mathematical techniques into the description of quantum phenomena. Dirac's approach to quantum mechanics Paul Dirac was trained as an electrical engineer at Bristol University, but he had a very strong mathematical bent. He was a solitary character who was notoriously quiet and self-effacing. He simply worked things out on his own.
Quantum theory originated from the constant introduced by Max Planck in his radiation law in 1900. Later Niels Bohr used the idea of matter waves for the explanation of atomic spectra. Heisenberg gave an algebraic treatment, called matrix mechanics, while Erwin Schrödinger formulated his wave mechanics. He published the first of four papers containing the celebrated equation in the Annalen der Physik in 1927, and showed that the atomic spectra resulted from solving his wave equation for the vibrational states. Schrödinger moved from Zürich to Berlin as Planck’s successor. In the year 1933 he shared the Nobel Prize for Physics with Dirac. With Hitler’s coming to power, however, Schrödinger was outraged and decided to leave Germany to take up a fellowship in Oxford. In 1934 he was offered a permanent position at Princeton University, but he did not accept it. He took a position at the Institute for Advanced Studies in Dublin in 1938, where he stayed till his retirement in 1955.
This book gives a detailed study of the development and the interpretation given to Niels Bohr's Principle of Correspondence. It also describes the role that this principle played in guiding Bohr's research over the critical period from 1920 to 1927. Quantum mechanics, developed in the 1920s and 1930s by Bohr, Heisenberg, Born, Schrödinger and Dirac, represents one of the most profound turning points in science. This theory required a wholly new kind of physics in which many of the principles, concepts and models representing reality, that had formed the basis of classical physics since Galileo and Newton, had to be abandoned. This book re-examines the birth of quantum mechanics, in particular examining the development of crucial and original insights of Niels Bohr.