Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Apparent Contradiction in EPR Correlations

Luiz Carlos Ryff

Published Jan 1, 1997• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-94-011-5682-0_32

Related papers

Four-photon interference: a realizable experiment to demonstrate violation of EPR postulates for perfect correlations

P. Hariharan, Joseph Samuel, Supurna Sinha

Bell's theorem reveals contradictions between the predictions of quantum mechanics and the EPR postulates for a pair of particles only in situations involving imperfect statistical correlations. However, with three or more particles, contradictions emerge even for perfect correlations. We describe an experiment which can be realized in the laboratory, using four-photon entangled states generated by parametric down-conversion, to demonstrate this contradiction at the level of perfect correlations.

arXiv:physics/0506212•Journal of Optics B Quantum and Semiclassical Optics•Jan 1, 1999•2 citations

A local realistic explanation of EPR correlations

M. Hoffmann

Foundations of Physics•Aug 1, 1990•0 citations

Timing in EPR correlations

O. Costa de Beauregard

Foundations of Physics Letters•Oct 1, 1992•1 citation

Cybernetical physics Part II: the EPR paradox and its implications

Uri Fidelman

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explain the Einstein, Podolski and Rosen (EPR) paradox applying the multidimensionality of time and the perpendicularity of the temporal axes. Design/methodology/approach The paper is an extension of the application of neuropsychology to physics, as previously described in Part I, to cosmology. Findings The paper removes the apparent contradictions in physics implied by the EPR paradox. Practical implications A theoretical basis for a possible instantaneous (faster than light) sending of messages to everywhere in the cosmos is provided. Originality/value This theory is entirely new. The possible application is independent from the existence of tachions.

Kybernetes•Feb 13, 2009•3 citations

Schrödinger on EPR

Guido Bacciagaluppi, Elise Crull

Schrödinger’s reaction to the EPR paper is less widely known than, say, Bohr’s, and yet our analysis shows that it fits rather nicely with contemporary concerns in foundations of quantum mechanics. Taking the lead both from the EPR paper and from Pauli’s remarks in their correspondence, Schrödinger shows that EPR’s locality considerations lead to the assignment of values to all quantum mechanical observables, but that under apparently mild assumptions this then leads to contradictions of the von Neumann type. This dilemma (as he explicitly calls it) is thus similar to more recent debates between nonlocality on the one hand and no-go results on the other (whether through violation of the Bell inequalities, the Kochen–Specker theorem, or what you will). We shall first look at Schrödinger’s fundamental worries in the years leading up to 1935. The chapter then discusses in detail the direct reaction by Schrödinger to EPR. It will, however, not exhaust our discussion of Schrödinger, who is a recurring character in the book, having poked and prodded his peers on EPR during the whole summer and autumn of 1935.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 14, 2024•0 citations

EPR: When Is a Correlation not a Mystery?

Bas C. van Fraassen

Oxford University Press eBooks•Sep 26, 1991•4 citations
Bell's theorem reveals contradictions between the predictions of quantum mechanics and the EPR postulates for a pair of particles only in situations involving imperfect statistical correlations. However, with three or more particles, contradictions emerge even for perfect correlations. We describe an experiment which can be realized in the laboratory, using four-photon entangled states generated by parametric down-conversion, to demonstrate this contradiction at the level of perfect correlations.
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explain the Einstein, Podolski and Rosen (EPR) paradox applying the multidimensionality of time and the perpendicularity of the temporal axes. Design/methodology/approach The paper is an extension of the application of neuropsychology to physics, as previously described in Part I, to cosmology. Findings The paper removes the apparent contradictions in physics implied by the EPR paradox. Practical implications A theoretical basis for a possible instantaneous (faster than light) sending of messages to everywhere in the cosmos is provided. Originality/value This theory is entirely new. The possible application is independent from the existence of tachions.
Schrödinger’s reaction to the EPR paper is less widely known than, say, Bohr’s, and yet our analysis shows that it fits rather nicely with contemporary concerns in foundations of quantum mechanics. Taking the lead both from the EPR paper and from Pauli’s remarks in their correspondence, Schrödinger shows that EPR’s locality considerations lead to the assignment of values to all quantum mechanical observables, but that under apparently mild assumptions this then leads to contradictions of the von Neumann type. This dilemma (as he explicitly calls it) is thus similar to more recent debates between nonlocality on the one hand and no-go results on the other (whether through violation of the Bell inequalities, the Kochen–Specker theorem, or what you will). We shall first look at Schrödinger’s fundamental worries in the years leading up to 1935. The chapter then discusses in detail the direct reaction by Schrödinger to EPR. It will, however, not exhaust our discussion of Schrödinger, who is a recurring character in the book, having poked and prodded his peers on EPR during the whole summer and autumn of 1935.