Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

SpringerBriefs in physics

Keldysh (Two-Time) Formalism

Tamás S. Bíró, Antal Jakovác

Published Jan 1, 2019• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-11689-7_3

Related papers

Introduction to the Keldysh Formalism

van Leeuwen, R., Dahlen, N.E., Stefanucci, Gianluca +2 more

•Jan 1, 2006•0 citations

Introduction to the Keldysh Formalism

Robert van Leeuwen, Nils Erik Dahlen, Gianluca Stefanucci +2 more

Lecture notes in physics•Jan 1, 2006•72 citations

Schwinger–Keldysh Formalism

Felix M. Haehl, Mukund Rangamani

Lecture notes in physics•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

The Schwinger–Keldysh formalism

Perry R. Rice

Institute of Physics eBooks•Jul 1, 2025•0 citations

A note on Keldysh's perturbation formalism

Wim P.H. de Boer, Ch.G. van Weert

Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•Oct 1, 1979•4 citations

A UNIFIED FORMALISM OF THERMAL QUANTUM FIELD THEORY

H. Chu, Hiroomi Umezawa

We present a comprehensive review of the most fundamental and practical aspects of thermo-field dynamics (TFD), including some of the most recent developments in the field. To make TFD fully consistent, some suitable changes in the structure of the thermal doublets and the Bogoliubov transformation matrices have been made. A close comparison between TFD and the Schwinger-Keldysh closed time path formalism (SKF) is presented. We find that TFD and SKF are in many ways the same in form; in particular, the two approaches are identical in stationary situations. However, TFD and SKF are quite different in time-dependent nonequilibrium situations. The main source of this difference is that the time evolution of the density matrix itself is ignored in SKF while in TFD it is replaced by a time-dependent Bogoliubov transformation. In this sense TFD is a better candidate for time-dependent quantum field theory. Even in equilibrium situations, TFD has some remarkable advantages over the Matsubara approach and SKF, the most notable being the Feynman diagram recipes, which we will present. We will show that the calculations of two-point functions are simplified, instead of being complicated, by the matrix nature of the formalism. We will present some explicit calculations using TFD, including space-time inhomogeneous situations and the vacuum polarization in equilibrium relativistic QED.

International Journal of Modern Physics A•Jun 10, 1994•57 citations
We present a comprehensive review of the most fundamental and practical aspects of thermo-field dynamics (TFD), including some of the most recent developments in the field. To make TFD fully consistent, some suitable changes in the structure of the thermal doublets and the Bogoliubov transformation matrices have been made. A close comparison between TFD and the Schwinger-Keldysh closed time path formalism (SKF) is presented. We find that TFD and SKF are in many ways the same in form; in particular, the two approaches are identical in stationary situations. However, TFD and SKF are quite different in time-dependent nonequilibrium situations. The main source of this difference is that the time evolution of the density matrix itself is ignored in SKF while in TFD it is replaced by a time-dependent Bogoliubov transformation. In this sense TFD is a better candidate for time-dependent quantum field theory. Even in equilibrium situations, TFD has some remarkable advantages over the Matsubara approach and SKF, the most notable being the Feynman diagram recipes, which we will present. We will show that the calculations of two-point functions are simplified, instead of being complicated, by the matrix nature of the formalism. We will present some explicit calculations using TFD, including space-time inhomogeneous situations and the vacuum polarization in equilibrium relativistic QED.