Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The small-noise approximation in linear amplifiers: Limitations and beyond

A. Chia, Michal Hajdušek, Rosario Fazio, L. C. Kwek, Vlatko Vedral

Published Nov 20, 2018• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

The phase of an optical field inside a linear amplifier is widely known to diffuse with a diffusion coefficient that is inversely proportional to the photon number. The same process occurs in lasers which limits its intrinsic linewidth and makes the phase uncertainty difficult to calculate. The most commonly used simplification is to assume a narrow photon-number distribution for the optical field (which we call the small-noise approximation). This relies on (i) the input to have a good signal-to-noise ratio, and (ii) that such a signal-to-noise ratio can be maintained throughout the amplification process. Here we ask: How many photons must be present in the input to a quantum linear amplifier for the phase noise to be amenable to a small-noise analysis? We show that for a linear amplifier which is signal-to-noise optimised (i.e. an amplifier most favourable to the small-noise approximation), the small-noise approximation breaks down for a coherent-state input with only a few photons on average. Interestingly, when the input strength is increased to tens of photons, the small-noise approximation can be seen to perform much better and the process of phase diffusion permits a small-noise analysis. This demarcates the limit of the small-noise assumption in linear amplifiers as such an assumption is less true for an amplifier which does not have its signal-to-noise performance optimised. In order to explore this limit we propose a description of phase diffusion that goes beyond the small-noise approximation which we call the inverse-number expansion. The small-noise approximation can then be understood as the lowest-order contribution to the inverse-number expansion while phase diffusion with only a few-photon input can be captured by the inclusion of higher-order terms.

Related papers

Phase diffusion and the small-noise approximation in linear amplifiers: Limitations and beyond

A. Chia, Michal Hajdušek, Rosario Fazio +2 more

The phase of an optical field inside a linear amplifier is widely known to diffuse with a diffusion coefficient that is inversely proportional to the photon number. The same process occurs in lasers which limits its intrinsic linewidth and makes the phase uncertainty difficult to calculate. The most commonly used simplification is to assume a narrow photon-number distribution for the optical field (which we call the small-noise approximation). For coherent light, this condition is determined by the average photon number. The small-noise approximation relies on (i) the input to have a good signal-to-noise ratio, and (ii) that such a signal-to-noise ratio can be maintained throughout the amplification process. Here we ask: For a coherent input, how many photons must be present in the input to a quantum linear amplifier for the phase noise at the output to be amenable to a small-noise analysis? We address these questions by showing how the phase uncertainty can be obtained without recourse to the small-noise approximation. It is shown that for an ideal linear amplifier (i.e. an amplifier most favourable to the small-noise approximation), the small-noise approximation breaks down with only a few photons on average. Interestingly, when the input strength is increased to tens of photons, the small-noise approximation can be seen to perform much better and the process of phase diffusion permits a small-noise analysis. This demarcates the limit of the small-noise assumption in linear amplifiers as such an assumption is less true for a nonideal amplifier.

arXiv:1811.08105•Quantum•Nov 4, 2019•8 citations

Phase properties of optical linear amplifiers

John A. Vaccaro, David Thomas Pegg

We examine the effects of linear amplification and attenuation on the quantum-mechanical phase properties of light for fields with mean photon numbers of at least the order of 10. The phase probability density is found to satisfy a diffusion equation for both phase-insensitive and phase-sensitive amplifiers and attenuators. The solution is a convolution of the initial phase probability density with an infinite series of expanding Gaussians which clearly illustrates the diffusion of the phase. In particular, we find that for phase-insensitive amplification the phase of the field undergoes time-dependent uniform diffusion. In the limit of large amplification the diffusion ceases and the phase variance of the amplified light is given by the input phase variance plus an extra term which is equal to the phase variance of a coherent state of the same intensity as the initial field. We show that the reduced phase variance of phase-optimized states (relative to coherent states of the same intensity) is lost for power gains greater than the photon-cloning value of 2. In contrast, phase-sensitive amplifiers give rise to time-dependent nonuniform phase diffusion. The amount of phase diffusion depends on the relative phase angle between the light and the amplifier. If the peak of a relatively narrow phase probability density is near a minimum in the phase diffusion coefficient, then the phase noise added by the amplifier will be less than that found for a phase-insensitive amplifier. Further squeezing of the amplifier reduces the added phase noise proportionally. We find that it is possible, using phase-sensitive amplifiers, to amplify phase-optimized states by power gains considerably larger than 2 and still retain a reduced phase variance.

Physical Review A•Jun 1, 1994•18 citations

Phase uncertainty in quantum linear amplifiers beyond the small-noise approximation

A. Chia, Michal Hajdušek, Rosario Fazio +2 more

We estimate the output phase uncertainty of linear amplifiers in a practical regime (weak input, ideal amplification, and large gain) without the small-noise assumption. Furthermore, the small-noise assumption is shown to fail in this regime.

Quantum Information and Measurement (QIM)•Jan 1, 2019•0 citations

Quantum limits on phase-preserving linear amplifiers

Carlton M. Caves, Joshua Combes, Jiang Zhang +1 more

The purpose of a phase-preserving linear amplifier is to make a small signal larger, regardless of its phase, so that it can be perceived by instruments incapable of resolving the original signal, while sacrificing as little as possible in signal-to-noise ratio. Quantum mechanics limits how well this can be done: A high-gain linear amplifier must degrade the signal-to-noise ratio; the noise added by the amplifier, when referred to the input, must be at least half a quantum at the operating frequency. This well-known quantum limit only constrains the second moments of the added noise. Here we derive the quantum constraints on the entire distribution of added noise: We show that any phase-preserving linear amplifier is equivalent to a parametric amplifier with a physical state for the ancillary mode; the noise added to the amplified field mode is distributed according to the Wigner function of the ancilla state.

arXiv:1208.5174•Physical Review A•Dec 3, 2012•109 citations

Photon-number fluctuations in phase-sensitive linear amplifiers

Stephen Mark Barnett, Claire R Gilson

It has long been known that amplification will degrade an optical signal and will rapidly destroy any intrinsically quantum features that may have been associated with the input. However, devices that exhibit squeezed fluctuations in the gain or loss medium can reduce the detrimental effects of the inevitable amplifier noise. This makes it possible to retain nonclassical features (in particular squeezing) at higher levels of gain than is possible in conventional devices. In this paper we study the effect of these amplifiers on the photon-number fluctuations. We find that, for suitable inputs, phase-sensitive amplifiers can reduce the tendency for the photon-number distribution to spread and allow us to retain sub-Poissonian statistics at a higher level of gain than is possible in conventional devices.

Physical Review A•Dec 1, 1989•10 citations

Quantum limits on noise in linear amplifiers

Carlton M. Caves

How much noise does quantum mechanics require a linear amplifier to add to a signal it processes? An analysis of narrow-band amplifiers (single-mode input and output) yields a fundamental theorem for phase-insensitive linear amplifiers; it requires such an amplifier, in the limit of high gain, to add noise which, referred to the input, is at least as large as the half-quantum of zero-point fluctuations. For phase-sensitive linear amplifiers, which can respond differently to the two quadrature phases ("$cos\ensuremath{\omega}t$" and "$sin\ensuremath{\omega}t$"), the single-mode analysis yields an amplifier uncertainty principle---a lower limit on the product of the noises added to the two phases. A multimode treatment of linear amplifiers generalizes the single-mode analysis to amplifiers with nonzero bandwidth. The results for phase-insensitive amplifiers remain the same, but for phase-sensitive amplifiers there emerge bandwidth-dependent corrections to the single-mode results. Specifically, there is a bandwidth-dependent lower limit on the noise carried by one quadrature phase of a signal and a corresponding lower limit on the noise a high-gain linear amplifier must add to one quadrature phase. Particular attention is focused on developing a multimode description of signals with unequal noise in the two quadrature phases.

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Oct 15, 1982•1,723 citations
The phase of an optical field inside a linear amplifier is widely known to diffuse with a diffusion coefficient that is inversely proportional to the photon number. The same process occurs in lasers which limits its intrinsic linewidth and makes the phase uncertainty difficult to calculate. The most commonly used simplification is to assume a narrow photon-number distribution for the optical field (which we call the small-noise approximation). This relies on (i) the input to have a good signal-to-noise ratio, and (ii) that such a signal-to-noise ratio can be maintained throughout the amplification process. Here we ask: How many photons must be present in the input to a quantum linear amplifier for the phase noise to be amenable to a small-noise analysis? We show that for a linear amplifier which is signal-to-noise optimised (i.e. an amplifier most favourable to the small-noise approximation), the small-noise approximation breaks down for a coherent-state input with only a few photons on average. Interestingly, when the input strength is increased to tens of photons, the small-noise approximation can be seen to perform much better and the process of phase diffusion permits a small-noise analysis. This demarcates the limit of the small-noise assumption in linear amplifiers as such an assumption is less true for an amplifier which does not have its signal-to-noise performance optimised. In order to explore this limit we propose a description of phase diffusion that goes beyond the small-noise approximation which we call the inverse-number expansion. The small-noise approximation can then be understood as the lowest-order contribution to the inverse-number expansion while phase diffusion with only a few-photon input can be captured by the inclusion of higher-order terms.
The phase of an optical field inside a linear amplifier is widely known to diffuse with a diffusion coefficient that is inversely proportional to the photon number. The same process occurs in lasers which limits its intrinsic linewidth and makes the phase uncertainty difficult to calculate. The most commonly used simplification is to assume a narrow photon-number distribution for the optical field (which we call the small-noise approximation). For coherent light, this condition is determined by the average photon number. The small-noise approximation relies on (i) the input to have a good signal-to-noise ratio, and (ii) that such a signal-to-noise ratio can be maintained throughout the amplification process. Here we ask: For a coherent input, how many photons must be present in the input to a quantum linear amplifier for the phase noise at the output to be amenable to a small-noise analysis? We address these questions by showing how the phase uncertainty can be obtained without recourse to the small-noise approximation. It is shown that for an ideal linear amplifier (i.e. an amplifier most favourable to the small-noise approximation), the small-noise approximation breaks down with only a few photons on average. Interestingly, when the input strength is increased to tens of photons, the small-noise approximation can be seen to perform much better and the process of phase diffusion permits a small-noise analysis. This demarcates the limit of the small-noise assumption in linear amplifiers as such an assumption is less true for a nonideal amplifier.
We examine the effects of linear amplification and attenuation on the quantum-mechanical phase properties of light for fields with mean photon numbers of at least the order of 10. The phase probability density is found to satisfy a diffusion equation for both phase-insensitive and phase-sensitive amplifiers and attenuators. The solution is a convolution of the initial phase probability density with an infinite series of expanding Gaussians which clearly illustrates the diffusion of the phase. In particular, we find that for phase-insensitive amplification the phase of the field undergoes time-dependent uniform diffusion. In the limit of large amplification the diffusion ceases and the phase variance of the amplified light is given by the input phase variance plus an extra term which is equal to the phase variance of a coherent state of the same intensity as the initial field. We show that the reduced phase variance of phase-optimized states (relative to coherent states of the same intensity) is lost for power gains greater than the photon-cloning value of 2. In contrast, phase-sensitive amplifiers give rise to time-dependent nonuniform phase diffusion. The amount of phase diffusion depends on the relative phase angle between the light and the amplifier. If the peak of a relatively narrow phase probability density is near a minimum in the phase diffusion coefficient, then the phase noise added by the amplifier will be less than that found for a phase-insensitive amplifier. Further squeezing of the amplifier reduces the added phase noise proportionally. We find that it is possible, using phase-sensitive amplifiers, to amplify phase-optimized states by power gains considerably larger than 2 and still retain a reduced phase variance.
The purpose of a phase-preserving linear amplifier is to make a small signal larger, regardless of its phase, so that it can be perceived by instruments incapable of resolving the original signal, while sacrificing as little as possible in signal-to-noise ratio. Quantum mechanics limits how well this can be done: A high-gain linear amplifier must degrade the signal-to-noise ratio; the noise added by the amplifier, when referred to the input, must be at least half a quantum at the operating frequency. This well-known quantum limit only constrains the second moments of the added noise. Here we derive the quantum constraints on the entire distribution of added noise: We show that any phase-preserving linear amplifier is equivalent to a parametric amplifier with a physical state for the ancillary mode; the noise added to the amplified field mode is distributed according to the Wigner function of the ancilla state.
It has long been known that amplification will degrade an optical signal and will rapidly destroy any intrinsically quantum features that may have been associated with the input. However, devices that exhibit squeezed fluctuations in the gain or loss medium can reduce the detrimental effects of the inevitable amplifier noise. This makes it possible to retain nonclassical features (in particular squeezing) at higher levels of gain than is possible in conventional devices. In this paper we study the effect of these amplifiers on the photon-number fluctuations. We find that, for suitable inputs, phase-sensitive amplifiers can reduce the tendency for the photon-number distribution to spread and allow us to retain sub-Poissonian statistics at a higher level of gain than is possible in conventional devices.
How much noise does quantum mechanics require a linear amplifier to add to a signal it processes? An analysis of narrow-band amplifiers (single-mode input and output) yields a fundamental theorem for phase-insensitive linear amplifiers; it requires such an amplifier, in the limit of high gain, to add noise which, referred to the input, is at least as large as the half-quantum of zero-point fluctuations. For phase-sensitive linear amplifiers, which can respond differently to the two quadrature phases ("$cos\ensuremath{\omega}t$" and "$sin\ensuremath{\omega}t$"), the single-mode analysis yields an amplifier uncertainty principle---a lower limit on the product of the noises added to the two phases. A multimode treatment of linear amplifiers generalizes the single-mode analysis to amplifiers with nonzero bandwidth. The results for phase-insensitive amplifiers remain the same, but for phase-sensitive amplifiers there emerge bandwidth-dependent corrections to the single-mode results. Specifically, there is a bandwidth-dependent lower limit on the noise carried by one quadrature phase of a signal and a corresponding lower limit on the noise a high-gain linear amplifier must add to one quadrature phase. Particular attention is focused on developing a multimode description of signals with unequal noise in the two quadrature phases.