The angular distribution of the emitted electrons, following the two-photon ionization of hydrogen-like ions, is studied within the framework of second order perturbation theory and the Dirac equation. Using a density matrix approach, we have investigated the effects which arise from the polarization of the incoming light as well as from the higher multipoles in the expansion of the electron–photon interaction. For medium- and high- Z ions, in particular, the non-dipole contributions give rise to a significant change in the angular distribution of the emitted electrons, if compared with the electric dipole approximation. This includes a strong forward emission while, in the dipole approximation, the electron emission always occurs symmetrically with respect to the plane which is perpendicular to the photon beam. Detailed computations for the dependence of the photoelectron angular distributions on the polarization of the incident light are carried out for the ionization of H, and Xe 53+ and U 91+ (hydrogen-like) ions.
The eight-component relativistic wave equation for spin-
21 particles of Robson and Staudte (FV
21), a Feshbach--Villars linearization of the Feynman--Gell-Mann equation, reproduces the Dirac hydrogenic spectrum with a doubled solution space and an indefinite inner product. Its exact Stark shifts must equal the Dirac ones; whether its indefinite-metric perturbation theory delivers them is not guaranteed. We compute the first- and second-order Stark shifts of the
n=1--3 levels of hydrogenic ions from H to U
91+ in the Schrödinger, Dirac and FV
21 theories, evaluating all spectral sums, continuum included, by the Dalgarno--Lewis method. The FV
21 and Dirac shifts coincide level by level, to working precision at first order (closed-form roots) and to 45 significant figures at second order. Both ingredients are needed: without the explicit spin--field coupling the first-order roots become complex, and without the negative-norm states the
(Zα)2 coefficient is wrong. Norm sign and parity are locked in the doubled space: a potential lifting the
2s1/2--
2p1/2 degeneracy needs its own spin--gradient term, and shifts placed by hand on the
κ-labeled states give a spurious imaginary linear Stark shift. The relativistic linear Stark effect is smaller by finite factors, but a second-moment sum rule shows the non-relativistic linear Stark strength is conserved, the missing part reappearing in singular
(Zα)−2 second-order terms. For levels with a fine-structure partner, an exact intra-shell/regular split of the second-order shift gives the
(Zα)0 coefficients analytically and relates the
π2 terms of the
(Zα)2 coefficients to the singular ones. The Dirac weak/strong-field crossover for
n=2 of hydrogen lies near 2.8~kV cm
−1, and the perturbative window set by the fine structure grows as
Z5.
Hyperfine splittings play an important role in quantum information and spintronics applications. They allow for the readout of the spin qubits, while at the same time providing the dominant mechanism for the detrimental spin decoherence. Their exact knowledge is thus of prior relevance. In this work, we analytically investigate the relativistic effects on the hyperfine splittings of hydrogen-like atoms, including finite-size effects of the nucleis’ structure. We start from exact solutions of Dirac’s equation using different nuclear models, where the nucleus is approximated by (i) a point charge (Coulomb potential), (ii) a homogeneously charged full sphere, and (iii) a homogeneously charged spherical shell. Equivalent modelling has been done for the distribution of the nuclear magnetic moment. For the 1s ground state and 2s excited state of the one-electron systems H1, H2, H3, and He+3, the calculated finite-size related hyperfine shifts are quite similar for the different structure models and in excellent agreement with those estimated by comparing QED and experiment. This holds also in a simplified approach where relativistic wave functions from a Coulomb potential combined with spherical-shell distributed nuclear magnetic moments promises an improved treatment without the need for an explicit solution of Dirac’s equation within the nuclear core. Larger differences between different nuclear structure models are found in the case of the anisotropic 2p3/2 orbitals of hydrogen, rendering these excited states as promising reference systems for exploring the proton structure.
A relativistic version of the quasiclassical imaginary-time formalism is developed. It permits calculation of the tunneling probability of relativistic particles through potential barriers, including barriers lacking spherical symmetry. Application of the imaginary-time formalism to concrete problems calls for finding subbarrier trajectories which are solutions of the classical equations of motion, but with an imaginary time (and thus cannot be realized in classical mechanics). The ionization probability of an s level, whose binding energy can be of the order of the rest energy, under the action of electric and magnetic fields of different configuration is calculated using the imaginary-time formalism. Besides the exponential factor, the Coulomb and pre-exponential factors in the ionization probability are calculated. The Hamiltonian approach to the tunneling of relativistic particles is described briefly. Scrutiny of the ionization of heavy atoms by an electric field provides an additional argument against the existence of the “Unruh effect.”
The profile of a hydrogen emission line is investigated on the assumption that the hydrogen atom is perturbed by passing ions. Provided that the ions do not approach to within ten times the average atomic radius the electric field of the ion may be assumed homogeneous and the matrix elements calculated for the usual Stark effect may be used. For a collision at low velocity or with close approach, the adiabatic approximation is valid, and the profile depends solely on the total phase shift produced by the collision. The Fourier analysis of the wave train may be carried through exactly for certain values of this phase shift. Nonadiabatic transitions are examined for the lowest lines, and an exact solution given for this case also. For higher lines a modified Born approximation is used. The Weisskopf collision broadening formula is shown to hold only in certain cases, and the dispersion curve smearing function for impact broadening is shown to lead in some instances to incorrect results.